Bratanova, Alexandra and Ford, Jerad A. and Schleiger, Emma (2023): Prioritising Investment Opportunities in Research and Development Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116458.pdf Download (532kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We demonstrate how multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is applied to assist prioritisation of investment in research and development programs. We investigate a case study of research programs prioritisation towards the Renewable Energy Powerhouse Mission by CSIRO, Australia’s national science agency. The data for MCDA was collected through a targeted survey, that reached over 200 internal and external stakeholders and received 53 responses. The results of MCDA demonstrate that the top alternative that outperformed others is focused on the direct routes to metals and chemicals. The second leader promotes the development of the natural graphite-to-anode industry, followed by revolutionizing the economics of battery recycling. The paper discusses the implementation of MCDA process in a cross-disciplinary area with multiple collaborators and interested parties, and when the results are highly uncertain. The results of this study fed into a re-articulation of the upcoming Mission strategy in a series of events in the first several months of 2021, which resulted in management endorsement of the new strategy and allocations of funding.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Prioritising Investment Opportunities in Research and Development Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis |
English Title: | Prioritising Investment Opportunities in Research and Development Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | multiple criteria decision analysis; research and development; investment; critical energy metal; CSIRO mission |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L61 - Metals and Metal Products ; Cement ; Glass ; Ceramics O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O22 - Project Analysis O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 116458 |
Depositing User: | Dr Alexandra Bratanova |
Date Deposited: | 22 Feb 2023 14:41 |
Last Modified: | 22 Feb 2023 14:41 |
References: | 1 DCLG (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. 2 Bratanova A, Olsen J, Hajkowicz S (2016). Prioritising sensory systems for Queensland: An evaluation of alternative sensory systems using multiple criteria analysis. Brisbane, Australia. 3 Mardani A, Jusoh A, Md Nor K, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1): 516-571. 4 Bratanova A, Robinson J, Wagner L, Kolegov V, Nikitchenko A, Nikitchenko A (2015). Multiple criteria analysis of policy alternatives to improve energy efficiency in industry in Russia. Uni-muenchen.de. 5 Golan O, Hansen P (2012). Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1(1): 44. 6 Marsh K, Lanitis T, Neasham D, Orfanos P, Caro J (2014). Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature. PharmacoEconomics, 32(4): 345-365. 7 Sullivan T, Hansen P (2017). Determining Criteria and Weights for Prioritizing Health Technologies Based on the Preferences of the General Population: A New Zealand Pilot Study. Value in Health, 20(4): 679-686. 8 Goetghebeur M M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt R J, Erickson L J, Rindress D (2008). Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Services Research, 8(1): 270. 9 Glaize A, Duenas A, Di Martinelly C, Fagnot I (2019). Healthcare decision-making applications using multicriteria decision analysis: A scoping review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 26(1-2): 62-83. 10 Baltussen R, Marsh K, Thokala P, Diaby V, Castro H, Cleemput I, Garau M, Iskrov G, Olyaeemanesh A, Mirelman A, Mobinizadeh M, Morton A, Tringali M, van Til J, Valentim J, Wagner M, Youngkong S, Zah V, Toll A, Jansen M et al. (2019). Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward. Value in Health, 22(11): 1283-1288. 11 Mardani A, Zavadskas E K, Khalifah Z, Zakuan N, Jusoh A, Nor K M, Khoshnoudi M (2017). A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71: 216-256. 12 Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas E K, Cavallaro F, Khalifah Z (2015). Sustainable and renewable Energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(10): 13947-13984. 13 Pohekar S D, Ramachandran M (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4): 365-381. 14 Streimikiene D, Balezentis T, Krisciukaitien I, Balezentis A (2012). Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5): 3302-3311. 15 Geneletti D (2019). 'A review of MCA applications for nature conservation' In: Multicriteria Analysis for Environmental Decision-Making. Anthem Press. 16 Bratanova A (2015). Development of tools for economic analysis for public sector programs in Russia: a case study of the energy efficiency program in Moscow. uq.edu.au. 17 CSIRO (2023). Renewable Energy Powerhouse (www.csiro.au). 18 CSIRO (2023). Mission driven science (www.csiro.au). 19 CSIRO (2021). Critical energy metals. 20 The World Bank (2020). Mineral Production to Soar as Demand for Clean Energy Increases (Press release, 11 May 2020). 21 Hajkowicz S, Bratanova A, Schleiger E, Brosnan A (2020). Global trade and investment megatrends: Exploring opportunities and risks for the Australian economy during and after the COVID-19 crisis with strategic foresight. Brisbane, Australia. 22 Hajkowicz S, Reeson A, Evans D, Bratanova A, Cameron L (2021). Industry Growth Opportunities: A technical report to support the Western Parkland City Economic Development Strategy. A research report for the New South Wales Government by CSIRO Data61 Insights. Australia: 23 Austrade (2018). The Lithium-ion battery value chain: New economy opportunities for Australia. 24 Bruce S, Delaval B, Moisi A, Ford J, West J, Loh J, Hayward J (2021). Critical Energy Minerals Roadmap. Australia. 25 Hajkowicz S (2020). Choosing Wisely: Presentation. Brisbane, Australia. 26 Naughtin C, Hajkowicz S, Schleiger E, Bratanova A, Cameron A, Zamin T, Dutta A (2022). Our Future World: Global megatrends impacting the way we live over coming decades. Brisbane, Australia. 27 Hajkowicz S, Naughtin C, Sanderson C, Schleiger E, Karimi S, Bratanova A, Bednarz T (2022). Artificial intelligence for science – Adoption trends and future development pathways. Brisbane, Australia. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116458 |