Larosa, Francesca and Mysiak, Jaroslav and Molinari, Marco and Varelas, Panagiotis and Akay, Haluk and McDowall, Will and Spadaru, Catalina and Fuso-Nerini, Francesco and Vinuesa, Ricardo (2023): Closing the gap between research and projects in climate change innovation in Europe.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116771.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Innovation is a key component to equip our society with tools to adapt to new climatic conditions. The development of research-action interfaces shifts useful ideas into operationalized knowledge allowing innovation to flourish. In this paper we quantify the existing gap between climate research and innovation action in Europe using a novel framework that combines artificial intelligence (AI) methods and network science. We compute the distance between key topics of research interest from peer review publications and core issues tackled by innovation projects funded by the most recent European framework programmes. Our findings reveal significant differences exist between and within the two layers. Economic incentives, agricultural and industrial processes are differently connected to adaptation and mitigation priorities. We also find a loose research-action connection in bioproducts, biotechnologies and risk assessment practices, where applications are still too few compared to the research insights. Our analysis supports policy-makers to measure and track how research funding result in innovation action, and to adjust decisions if stated priorities are not achieved.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Closing the gap between research and projects in climate change innovation in Europe |
English Title: | Closing the gap between research and projects in climate change innovation in Europe |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | climate innovation; natural language processing; knowledge production |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 116794 |
Depositing User: | Dr Francesca Larosa |
Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2023 08:06 |
Last Modified: | 23 Mar 2023 08:06 |
References: | References 1. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). 2. European Commission. Innovation - European industrial strategy. Internal market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/strategy/innovation_en (2023). 3. Vinuesa, R. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Commun 11, 233 (2020). 4. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E. & Tavoni, M. Climate change mitigation, technological innovation and adaptation : a new perspective on climate policy. (2014). 5. O’Brien, K. & Sygna, L. Responding to climate change: The three spheres of transformation. in Proceedings of Transformation in a Changing Climate 16–23 (2013). 6. Grubb, M. et al. Induced innovation in energy technologies and systems: a review of evidence and potential implications for CO2 mitigation. Environmental Research Letters 16, 043007 (2021). 7. Maas, T. Y., Pauwelussen, A. & Turnhout, E. Co-producing the science–policy interface: towards common but differentiated responsibilities. Nature Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9, 93 (2022). 8. Arnott, J. C. & Lemos, M. C. Understanding knowledge use for sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 120, 222–230 (2021). 9. Spilsbury, M. J. & Nasi, R. The interface of policy research and the policy development process: challenges posed to the forestry community. For Policy Econ 8, 193–205 (2006). 10. Field, C. B. et al. Summary for policymakers. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts,Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1–32 (IPCC, 2014). 11. Mukherjee, S., Romero, D. M., Jones, B. & Uzzi, B. The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot. Sci Adv 3, (2017). 12. van Beek, L., Hajer, M., Pelzer, P., van Vuuren, D. & Cassen, C. Anticipating futures through models: the rise of Integrated Assessment Modelling in the climate science-policy interface since 1970. Global Environmental Change 65, 102191 (2020). 13. Vinnova. Innovations and new technology - what is the role of research? Implications for public policy. (2014). 14. OECD. Enhancing Research Performance through Evaluation, Impact Assessment and Priority Setting. (2016). 15. European Commission. Reforming research assessment: The Agreement is now final. Research and Innovation Directorate (2022). 16. Fortunato, S. et al. Science of science. Science (1979) 359, (2018). 17. UNFCCC. Paris Agreement - UN Framework Convention on Climate Change . (UNFCCC, 2016). 18. IPCC. Special report on Global Warming of 1.5 oC . https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/ (2018). 19. World Energy Council. Energy for Tomorrow’s World: The Realities, the Options and the Agenda for Achievement: (1993). 20. Grubb, M., Chapuis, T. & Duong, M. H. The economics of changing course. Implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy. Energy Policy 23, 417–431 (1995). 21. Toman, M. Research frontiers in the economics of climate change. in Environmental and Resource Economics vol. 11 603–621 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998). 22. Agrawala, S. Early science-policy interactions in climate change: Lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. Global Environmental Change 9, 157–169 (1999). 23. Weyant, J. P. & Olavson, T. Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4, 67–85 (1999). 24. Grübler, A., Nakićenović, N. & Victor, D. G. Modeling Technological Change: Implications for the global environment. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24, 545–569 (1999). 25. Menanteau, P., Finon, D. & Lamy, M. L. Prices versus quantities: Choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31, 799–812 (2003). 26. Kolk, A. & Pinkse, J. Business Responses to Climate Change: Identifying Emergent Strategies. Calif Manage Rev 47, 6–20 (2005). 27. Kolk, A. & Pinkse, J. Market strategies for climate change. European Management Journal 22, 304–314 (2004). 28. Popp, D. ENTICE: Endogenous Technological Change in the DICE Model of Global Warming. J Environ Econ Manage 48, 742–768 (2004). 29. van der Zwaan, B. C. C. et al. Endogenous Technological Change in Climate Change Modelling. Energy Econ 24, 1–19 (2002). 30. Grubb, M., Köhler, J. & Anderson, D. Induced Technical Change in Energy and Environmental Modeling: Analytic Approaches and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27, 271–308 (2002). 31. Rayner, S., Lach, D. & Ingram, H. Weather forecasts are for wimps: Why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Change 69, 197–227 (2005). 32. Houtekamer, P. L. et al. Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon Weather Rev 133, 604–620 (2005). 33. Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R. & Bettinger, R. L. Was Agriculture Impossible during the Pleistocene but Mandatory during the Holocene? A Climate Change Hypothesis. Am Antiq 66, 387–411 (2001). 34. Qu, X., Alvarez, P. J. J. & Li, Q. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47, 3931–3946 (2013). 35. Chapman, L. Transport and climate change: a review. J Transp Geogr 15, 354–367 (2007). 36. Cooper, P. J. M. et al. Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agric Ecosyst Environ 126, 24–35 (2008). 37. Weber, K. M. & Rohracher, H. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res Policy 41, 1037–1047 (2012). 38. Seyfang, G. & Haxeltine, A. Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 30, 381–400 (2012). 39. Pahl-Wostl, C. The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environmental Modelling and Software 22, 561–569 (2007). 40. Nikolaidis, P. & Poullikkas, A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews vol. 67 597–611 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044 (2017). 41. Deng, J., Li, M. & Wang, Y. Biomass-derived carbon: Synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Green Chemistry vol. 18 4824–4854 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc01172a (2016). 42. Jadhav, S. G., Vaidya, P. D., Bhanage, B. M. & Joshi, J. B. Catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol: A review of recent studies. Chemical Engineering Research and Design vol. 92 2557–2567 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.005 (2014). 43. Gielen, D. et al. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews 24, 38–50 (2019). 44. Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature vol. 528 51–59 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743 (2015). 45. Bojinski, S. et al. The concept of essential climate variables in support of climate research, applications, and policy. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95, 1431–1443 (2014). 46. European Commission. The European Green Deal. COM/2019/640 final (2019). 47. The House of Representatives. 116th Congress 1st Session H. Res. 109. US Government (2019). 48. Schumpeter, J. A. The theory of economic development : an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. (Harvard Economic Studies, 1934). 49. Grubb, M. Planetary Economics. (Routledge, 2014). 50. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Pörtner, H. O. et al.) In Press (Cambridge University Press, 2022). 51. International Energy Agency (IEA) & European Patent Office (EPO). Patents and the Energy Transition. https://www.iea.org/reports/patents-and-the-energy-transition (2021). 52. Blei, D. M. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM 55 4, 77–84 (2012). 53. Airoldi, E. M., Blei, D. M., Erosheva, E. A. & Fienberg, S. E. Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications. (2014). 54. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R. & Vincent, P. A Neural Probabilistic Language Model. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. Leen, T., Dietterich, T. & Tresp, V.) vol. 13 (MIT Press, 2000). 55. Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-T. & Zweig, G. Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. in Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies 746–751 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2013). 56. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M. & Airoldi, E. M. A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences. J Am Stat Assoc 111, 988–1003 (2016). 57. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003). 58. Blei, D. M. & Lafferty, J. D. A correlated topic model of Science. Ann Appl Stat 1, 17–35 (2007). 59. Paul, M. & Dredze, M. SPRITE: Generalizing Topic Models with Structured Priors. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist 3, 43–57 (2015). 60. Ahmed, A. & Xing, E. P. Timeline: A Dynamic Hierarchical Dirichlet Process Model for Recovering Birth/Death and Evolution of Topics in Text Stream. in Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2010). 61. Eisenstein, J., Ahmed, A. & Xing, E. P. Sparse additive generative models of text. in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning 1041–1048 (2011). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116794 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Closing the gap between research and projects in climate change innovation in Europe. (deposited 22 Mar 2023 07:30)
- Closing the gap between research and projects in climate change innovation in Europe. (deposited 23 Mar 2023 08:06) [Currently Displayed]