War and Peace in East Asia: Avoiding Thucydides’s Trap with China as a Rising Power

Khan, Haider (2023): War and Peace in East Asia: Avoiding Thucydides’s Trap with China as a Rising Power.

Abstract

Many have noticed the rise of China and warned of underlying danger to regional stability in Northeast Asia leading to global instability. A discourse about whether China and the U.S. will fall into the so-called “Thucydides’s Trap” has begun. Some observers are concerned that the active maritime military action of China over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands, South China Sea, and the Taiwan Strait may lead to unexpected conflicts between China and other Northeast Asian actors with eventual US-China confrontation. I present some conceptual elaborations of “Thucydides’s Trap” from both a scientific realist view of causal depth and a deeper form of neoclassical realism in international relations with appropriate historiography. I offer evidence from recent history of Northeast Asian international relations that the trap is avoidable but avoiding it requires important confidence building measures. The neoclassical realist considerations of internal politics of key actors shows an overwhelming consensus regarding peaceful conflict resolution via a grand strategy of cooperation with some conflicts that can be resolved through negotiations in good faith. While a full blown theory of Thucydides’s Trap within the broader framework of power transition theory is still to be worked out, this work can also be seen as a step in that direction. Although detailed analysis of the best available current historical evidence from Northeast Asia within a critical neoclassical realist(CNR), or more detailed critical transneoclassical realist(CTNR) paradigm shows that the so-called “Thucydides’s Trap” is not inevitable, recognizing the actual opportunities and constraints in order to escape the trap has hardly begun. Since the consequences of an actual war are so severe, both conceptual analysis of sovereignty and power based on realist principles and applied consequentialist reasoning offer strong arguments for finding credible means to avoid the trap. This chapter points to some feasible steps in light of a careful reading of recent history of Northeast Asian relations and offers a tentative scientific realist conceptualization of the “Thucydides’s Trap.” In particular, the CNR theory based analysis already shows the limitations of the structural neorealism on which Mearsheimer explicitly and Allison implicitly base their arguments about US-PRC rivalry and tensions. Using the causally deeper CNR approach and the concrete case of tensions in Northeast Asia, the present work can be seen as a necessary step in the direction of developing an applicable theory of “Thucydides’s Trap” with sufficient causal depth and analytical reach within a yet broader and more useful global theory. This effort will be a further step towards building a complexity theory based multiplex cooperative new global order, or CTMNGO combining constructively a critical transneoclassical realism(CTNR) with global and regional cooperative institution building for our genuine planetary common good.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: National Interest; Critical Neoclassical Realism(CNR); CTNR; Complexity Theory-based Multiplex New Global Order(CTMNGO);US-PRC Relations; Northeast Asian International Relations; Thucydides’s Trap; Scientific Realism; China’s Foreign Policy, US Grand Strategy
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy; P - Economic Systems > P0 - General

References

Adams, John Quincy. 1861. ‘She Goes Not Abroad in Search of Monsters to Destroy”. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/repository/she-goes-not-abroad-in-search-of-monsters-to-destroy/

Alagappa, Muthiah. ed. 2003. Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Allison, Graham. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydide’s Trap?. Boston/New York: Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.

---------------- and Kishore Mahbubani. 2020. Zoom Conversation, China Institute. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4L3gF-sLXc

Balot, Ryan K., Sara Forsdyke, and Edith Foster, eds. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barrett, Paul H., Gautrey, Peter J., Herbert, Sandra, Kohn, David and Smith, Sydney eds. 1987. Charles Darwin’s Notebooks, 1836–1844: Geology, Transmutation of Species, Metaphysical Enquiries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Benson, Michelle. 2007. “Extending the Bounds of Power Transition Theory.” International Interactions 33: 3, 211-215.

Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. 1st ed. Leeds: Leeds Books.

Boyd, Richard N. 1973. “Realism, Underdetermination, and a Causal Theory of Evidence.” Nous 7: 1, 1-12. __________. 1992. “Constructivism, Realism, and Philosophical Method.” In Inference, Explanation, and Other Philosophical Frustrations, ed. J. Earman. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bussmann, Margit., and Oneal, John R. 2007. “Do Hegemons Distribute Private Goods?: A Test of Power-Transition Theory.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51:1, 88-111.

Carr, E.H. 1961. What is History? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cave, Damien. 2017. “China Scolds Australia Over Its Fears of Foreign Influence, ” The New York Times, Dec. 6, 2017. Accessed on November 20, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/world/australia/china-foreign-influence. html?_ga=2.164828543.1957223847.1562053485-1695239366.1548222543.

Cha, Victor D. 2007. “Winning Asia: Washington's Untold Success Story.” Foreign Affairs 86: 6, 98-1 13.

Clark, Ian. 2011. “China and the United States: A Succession of Hegemonies?” International Affairs 87: 1, 13–28.

Clarke, Kevin A. 2007. “The Necessity of Being Comparative: Theory Comparisons in Quantitative Political Science.” Comparative Political Studies 40: 7, 886-908.

Darwin, Charles R. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. 1st ed. London: Murray.

__________. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2 vols. 1st ed. London: Murray and New York: Hill.

__________. 1883. The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication, 2 vols. 2nd ed. London and New York: Murray and Appleton.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Allen Lane.

De Soysa, Indra., Oneal, John R., and Park, Yong-Hee. 1997. “Testing Power-Transition Theory Using Alternative Measures of National Capabilities.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 4, 509-528.

Dewey, John. 1910. The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy and Other Essays in Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Holt.

Efird, Brian., Kugler, Jacek., and Genna, Gaspare. 2003. “From War to Integration: Generalizing Power Transition Theory.” International Interactions 29: 4, 293-313.

Eminue, Okon E., and Ufomba, Henry U. 2011. “Modeling Terrorist Target Selection: Organski's Power Transition Theory.” Defense & Security Analysis 27: 4, 375-382.

Donnelly, Jack. 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gady, Franz-Stefan. 2015. “Toothless tiger: Japan Self-Defence Forces,” BBC, October 15, 2015.

Gilbert, Alan. 1999. Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Goh, Evelyn. 2007-2008. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia,” International Security 32: 3, 113-157.

Green, Michael.2019. By More Than Providence: Grand Strategy and American Power in the Asia Pacific Since 1783.New York: Columbia University Press.

Güneylioğlu, Murat. 2017. “War, Status Quo, and Peace in the South Caucasus: A Power Transition Perspective.” Public Integrity 19: 4, 316-341.

Harman, Gilbert. 1965. “The Inference to the Best Explanation.” Philosophical Review 74: 1, 88-95.

He, Yinan. 2014. “Identity Politics and Foreign Policy: Taiwan’s Relations with China and Japan, 1895-2012,” Political Science Quarterly 129: 3 (Fall 2014), pp. 469-500.

Herscovitch, Benjamin. 2017. “A Balanced Threat Assessment of China’s South China Sea Policy”. https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/balanced-threat-assessment-chinas-south-china-sea-policy

Hobbes, Thomas. 1946. Leviathan or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Eccelesticall and Civil. Ed. Michael Oakeshott. New York: Collier.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2001. “Darwin, Veblen and the Problem of Causality in Economics.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23: 3/4, 383–422.

__________. 2002. “Darwinism in Economics: from analogy to ontology.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 2, 259–81.

__________. 2003. “The mystery of the routine: the Darwinian destiny of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.” Revue Économique 54: 2, 355–84.

__________. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London and New York: Routledge.

Harris, Peter. 2015. “Problems with Power-Transition Theory: Beyond the Vanishing Disparities Thesis.” Asian Security 10: 3, 241-259

Jaffee, S. N. 2017. Thucydides on the Outbreak of War: Character and Contest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jervis, Robert. 1988. “War and Misperception.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18: 4 (The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars), 675-700.

Kang, David. 2003. “Hierarchy and Stability in Asian International Relations,” In International Relations Theory and the Asia Pacific, eds. G. John Ikenberry and Michael Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press, 163-190. Kang, David C. (2017) American Grand Strategy and East Asian Security in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge University Press. Kang, David C. (2010). East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. Columbia University Press.

Kennan, George. 1984. American Diplomacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Khan, Haider. 2008. “Causal Depth contra Humean Empiricism: Aspects of a Scientific Realist Approach to Explanation.” IDEAS paper.

___________. 2013. “U.S. Foreign Policy and Asia: Peace and Prosperity or Instability and Crisis?” Econ Papers, https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/5016.

___________. 2017. “US Foreign Policy.” Financial Express. Dhaka, Bangladesh, Feb. 2017.

___________. 2018. “Neoclassical Realism, Moral Realism and Thucydides’s Trap: Towards a 21st Century Power Transition Theory.” Working Paper, JKSIS, University of Denver.

Khan, Haider and Heikki Patomäki. 2013. “A Reconstructive Critique of IPE and GPE from a critical scientific realist perspective: An alternative Keynesian-Kaleckian approach,” Econ Papers

Khan, Haider and W-T. Yang(2019).On Thucydises’s Trap in Northesat Asia, JKSIS Discussion Paper. Denver, USA

Kim, Woosang, and Gates, Scott. 2015. “Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China.” International Area Studies Review 18: 3, 219-226.

Kirshner, Jonathan. 2019. “Handle Him with Care: The Importance of Getting Thucydides Right.” Security Studies 28: 1, 1-24. Kugler, Jacek and Ronald L. Tammen, et al. Power Transitions. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2000. Kugler, Jacek and A. F. K. Organski. The War Ledger. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.

Lebow, Richard Ned., & Valentino, Benjamin. 2009. “Lost in Transition: A Critical Analysis of Power Transition Theory.” International Relations 23: 3, 389-410.

Lee, Sang-Hwan. 2015. “Global and Regional Orders in the 21st Century in Terms of Multi-layered Power Transition Theory: The Cases of US-China and China-Japan Relations.” International Area Studies Review 18: 3, 266-279.

Lemke, Douglas. 1997. “The Continuation of History: Power Transition Theory and the End of the Cold War.” Journal of Peace Research 34: 1, 23-36.

Lemke, Douglas., and Tammen, Ronald L. 2003. “Power Transition Theory and the Rise of China.” International Interactions 29: 4, 269-271.

Lim, Yves-Heng. 2014. “How (Dis)Satisfied Is China? A Power Transition Theory Perspective.” Journal of Contemporary China 24: 92, 280-297

Lundestad, Geir. 1986. “Empire by Invitation? The United States and Western Europe, 1945-1952.” Journal of Peace Research 23: 3, 263-277.

Maslow, Sebastian. 2015. “A Blue print for a Strong Japan? Abe Shinzo and Japan’s Evolving Security System.” Asian Survey 55: 4, 739-765.

Mayr, Ernst. 1964. “Introduction.” In facsimile of the first edition of Darwin, Charles R. (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: Murray, pp. vii–xxvii.

_________. 1988. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

_________. 1992. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. London: Allen Lane.

McFaul, Michael. 2020. “Xi Jinping Is Not Stalin: How a Lazy Historical Analogy Derailed Washington’s China Strategy”, Foreign Affairs,

Miller, R. 1987. Fact and Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1951. Politics Among Nations. New York: Knopf.

Pempel, T J. 2010. “Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism.” Journal of East Asian Studies 10: 2, 209-238, 360.

Posen, Barry R. 2003. “Command of the Commons: The Military Foundations of U.S. Hegemony.” International Security 28: 1, 5-46.

Rauch, Carsten. 2017a. “Challenging the Power Consensus: GDP, CINC, and Power Transition Theory.” Security Studies 26: 4, 642-664.

_______. 2017b. “A Tale of Two Power Transitions: Capabilities, Satisfaction, and the Will to Power in the Relations between the United Kingdom, the United States, and Imperial Germany.” International Area Studies Review 20: 3, 201-222

Rose, Gideon. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”, World Politics 51: 1, 144-172.

Sanjian, Gregory S. 2003. “Arms Transfers, Military Balances, and Interstate Relations: Modeling Power Balance Versus Power Transition Linkages.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47: 6, 711-727

SCHARRE, PAUL. 2018. The Future of War. New York: W.W. Norton.

Shin, Gi‐Wook. 2012. “Identity Politics and Policy Disputes in U.S.‐Korea Relations.” Political Science Quarterly 127: 2, 289-310.

Schweller, Randall. 2018. “Opposite but Compatible Nationalisms: A Neoclassical Realist Approach to the Future of US–China Relations”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11:1, 23-48.

Sciubba, Jennifer Dabbs., And Toft, Monica Duffy. 2014. “Coffins versus Cradles: Russian Population, Foreign Policy, and Power Transition Theory.” International Area Studies Review 17: 2, 205-221

Solingen, Etel. 2007. “Pax Asiatica Versus Bella Levantina: The Foundations of War and Peace in East Asia and the Middle East.” American Political Science Review 101: 4, 757-780.

Stoessinger, John G. 1982. Why Nations Go to War. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

The Mainland Affairs Council Republic of China (Taiwan). 2019. The Public Opinion Survey on “Public’s View on Current Cross-Strait Relations.” March, 2019.

The Ministry of Defense of Japan (MODJ). 2017. Defense of Japan 2017. Accessed on November 20, 2019. http://www.mod.go.jp/e/publ/w_paper/2017.html.

Thucydides. 1976. History of the Peloponnesian War, Loeb Classical Library.

_______.1989. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Thomas Hobbes, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

_______.1982. History of the Peloponnesian War. Translated by Richard Crawley and revised by T.E. Wick. New York: Modern Library.

_______.2003. History of the Peloponnesian War. Book 1, Grammatical Commentary by H.D. Cameron, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

TOFT, MONICA DUFFY. 2007. “Population Shifts and Civil War: A Test of Power Transition Theory.” International Interactions 33: 3, 243-269.

U.S. Department of Defense (USDOD). 2018. Assessing and strengthening
the manufacturing and defense industrial base and supply chain resiliency of the United States. September 2018.

Walker, Christopher, and Lucan Way. 2016. “The Authoritarian Threat,” Journal of Democracy 27: 1 (January 2016), pp. 49-63.

Wallace, William. 1971. Foreign policy and the Political Process. London: Macmillan.

Wendt, Alexander. 1998. “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 24 (special issue), 101-17.

__________. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

__________. 2000. “On the Via Media: A Response to The Critics.” Review of International Studies 26, 165-180.

__________. 2001. “Driving with The Rearview Mirror: On The Rational Science of Institutional Design.” International Organization 55: 4, 1019-1049.

Wilson, Robert A. 1994. “Causal Depth, Theoretical Appropriateness, and Individualism in Psychology.” Philosophy of Science 61: 1, 5-75

Zhao, Suisheng. 2019. “Engagement on the Defensive: From the Mismatched Grand Bargain to the Emerging US-China Rivalry.” Journal of Contemporary China 28:118, 501-518.

__________ 2013. “Foreign Policy Implications of Chinese Nationalism Revisited: The Strident Turn.” Journal of Contemporary China 22:82, 535-553.