Militarization of NATO Countries Sparks Climate Change? Investigating the Moderating Role of Technological Progress and Financial Development

Pata, Ugur Korkut and Destek, Mehmet Akif and Manga, Muge and Cengiz, Orhan (2023): Militarization of NATO Countries Sparks Climate Change? Investigating the Moderating Role of Technological Progress and Financial Development. Published in: Journal of Cleaner Production No. 409 (19 April 2023)

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of military expenditures (MEX) on environmental pollution, as well as the moderating role of factors such as financial development and technological progress for 15 NATO member countries under the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. Using the CS-ARDL estimator, the study analyzes the effects of MEX, income, energy consumption, financial development, and technical progress on carbon emissions spanning the period from 1991 to 2018. Additionally, interaction terms are employed to regularize the moderating effects of financial development and technical advancement. The results show that income, energy consumption, and MEX all contribute to a rise in emissions. It is also found that the financial sector does not eradicate the detrimental ramifications of MEX on the environment, but that technological progress has a moderating effect. A 1% increase in the interaction of technological progress with the military sector reduces environmental degradation by 0.36, but a 1% augment in the interaction of the financial sector with the military sector increases carbon emissions by 0.41%. For this reason, it is imperative to evaluate and revise the financing of MEX of NATO countries from an environmental perspective for sustainable development. Furthermore, as long-run income elasticity in NATO countries is lower than the short-run one, the EKC hypothesis is valid. Based on the overall findings, the study suggests that NATO allies should incorporate the benefits of income growth and technological development into their environmental policies to offset the negative effects of MEX.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Military expenditures; EKC; environment; energy consumption; technological progress, financial development
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Abbasi, F., Riaz, K. 2016. CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy, 90, 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.017

Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D. 2021. Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 16057-16082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2

Adebayo, T. S., Coelho, M. F., Onbaşıoğlu, D. Ç., Rjoub, H., Mata, M. N., Carvalho, P. V., Rita, J. X., Adeshola, I. 2021. Modeling the dynamic linkage between renewable energy consumption, globalization, and environmental degradation in South Korea: does technological innovation matter?. Energies, 14, 4265. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144265

Adebayo, T. S., Oladipupo, S. D., Kirikkaleli, D., Adeshola, I. 2022. Asymmetric nexus between technological innovation and environmental degradation in Sweden: An aggregated and disaggregated analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29,36547-36564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17982-6

Adebayo, T. S., Ullah, S., Kartal, M. T., Ali, K., Pata, U. K., Ağa, M. 2023. Endorsing sustainable development in BRICS: The role of technological innovation, renewable energy consumption, and natural resources in limiting carbon emission. Science of The Total Environment, 859, 160181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160181

Agozie, D. Q., Gyamfi, B. A., Bekun, F. V., Ozturk, I., Taha, A. 2022. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis from lens of economic complexity index for BRICS: evidence from second generation panel analysis. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102597

Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., Hussain, N., Sinha, A. 2022. Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference?. Gondwana Research, 105, 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012

Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Raza, M. Y. 2020. Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 23586-23601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7

Ahmed, N., Khan, T. I., Augustine, A. 2018. Climate change and environmental degradation: a serious threat to global security. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1307227

Ali, W., Abdullah, A., Azam, M. 2016. The dynamic linkage between technological innovation and carbon dioxide emissions in Malaysia: an autoregressive distributed lagged bound approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(3), 389-400.

Al-Mulali, U., Tang, C. F., Ozturk, I. 2015. Estimating the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 918-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.017

Aqib, M., Zaman, K. 2023. Greening the Workforce: The Power of Investing in Human Capital. Archives of the Social Sciences: A Journal of Collaborative Memory, 1(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7620041

Azam, M. Feng, Y. 2017. Does military expenditure increase external debt? Evidence from Asia, Defence and Peace Economics, 28(5), 550-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2015.1072371

Azam, M. 2020. Does military spending stifle economic growth? The empirical evidence from non-OECD countries. Heliyon, 6(12), e05853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05853

Aziz, N. Khalid, U. 2019. Armed conflict, military expenses and FDI inflow to developing countries, Defence and Peace Economics, 30(2), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1388066

Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., Khan, D. 2021. Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: does globalization matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615

Bargaoui, S. A., Nouri, F. Z. 2017. Dynamic panel data analysis of CO2 emissions driving forces. Journal of Economics Studies and Research, 2017, 1-18.

Bildirici, M. 2017a. CO2 emissions and militarization in G7 countries: panel cointegration and trivariate causality approaches. Environment and Development Economics, 22, 771-791. doi:10.1017/S1355770X1700016X

Bildirici, M. E. 2017b. The causal link among militarization, economic growth, CO2 emission, and energy consumption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 4625-4636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8158-z

Bildirici, M. 2018. Impact of military on biofuels consumption and GHG emissions: the evidence from G7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 13560-13568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1545-x

Bocse, A. M. 2020. NATO, energy security and institutional change. European Security, 29(4), 436-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1768072

Bolton, M. B., Minor, E. 2021. Addressing the ongoing humanitarian and environmental consequences of nuclear weapons: an introductory review. Global Policy, 12(1), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12892

Bradford, J. H., Stoner, A. M. 2017. The treadmill of destruction in comparative perspective: A panel study of military spending and carbon emissions, 1960-2014. Journal of World-Systems Research, 23(2), 298-325. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2017.688

Breusch, T. S., Pagan, A. R. 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111

Chang, S., Chen, B., Song, Y. 2023. Militarization, renewable energy utilization, and ecological footprints: Evidence from RCEP economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 391, 136298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136298

Charfeddine, L., Kahia, M. 2019. Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy, 139, 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010

Chen, F., Ahmad, S., Arshad, S., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Saleem, M. H., Dinha, O. M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D. 2022. Towards achieving eco-efficiency in top 10 polluted countries: The role of green technology and natural resource rents. Gondwana Research, 110, 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.06.010

Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., & Raissi, M. 2013. Debt, inflation and growth-robust estimation of long-run effects in dynamic panel data models. Available at SSRN 2371243.

Chudik, A., Pesaran, M. H. 2015. Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007

Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M. H., Raissi, M. 2016. Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Chien, F., Ajaz, T., Andlib, Z., Chau, K. Y., Ahmad, P., Sharif, A. 2021. The role of technology innovation, renewable energy and globalization in reducing environmental degradation in Pakistan: a step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy, 177, 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.101

Christoforidis, T., Katrakilidis, C. 2021. Does foreign direct investment matter for environmental degradation? Empirical Evidence from Central–Eastern European Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00820-y

Clark, B., Jorgenson, A. K., Kentor, J. 2010. Militarization and energy consumption: A test of treadmill of destruction theory in comparative perspective. International Journal of Sociology, 40(2), 23-43. https://doi.org/IJS0020-7659400202

Dar, J. A., Asif, M. 2018. Does financial development improve environmental quality in Turkey? An application of endogenous structural breaks based cointegration approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2017-0021

Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M. 2019. The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO2 emissions in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15028-15038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04891-y

DeRouen Jr., K. R. 1994. Defense spending and economic growth in Latin America: The externalities effects. International Interactions, 19(3), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629408434827

Destek, M. A. 2019. Financial Development and Environmental Degradation in Emerging Economies. In Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization (pp. 115- 132). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06001-5_5

Destek, M. A., Manga, M. 2021. Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 21991-22001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2

Destek, M. A., Manga, M., Cengiz, O., Destek, G. 2022. Investigating the potential of renewable energy in establishing global peace: Fresh evidence from top energy consumer countries. Renewable Energy, 197, 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.097

Doolittle, S. 2003. Ten reasons why militarism is bad for the environment. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.584.321&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Accessed 20 November 2021).

Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014

Edmond, N. D., Boker, P. 2019. Economic growth, military spending and environmental degradation in Africa. MPRA Working Paper (No. 97455). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/97455/ (Accessed 15 October 2022).

Elgin, C., Elveren, A. Y., Ozgur, G., Dertli, G. 2022. Military spending and sustainable development. Review of Development Economics, 26(3), 1466-1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12893

Erdogan, S. 2021. Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and building sector carbon emissions in the BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780

Esmaeilpour-Moghadam, H., Dehbashi, V. 2018. The impact of financial development and trade on environmental quality in Iran. Empirical Economics, 54, 1777-1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1266-x

Fan, H., Hossain, M. I. 2018. Technological innovation, trade openness, CO2 emission and economic growth: comparative analysis between China and India. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6), 240-257.

Gezer, M. A. 2022. The causality relationship between military expenditure and GDP in 12 NATO member countries based on per capita values. Sosyoekonomi, 30(52), 157-181. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.02.09

Gokmenoglu, K. K., Taspinar, N., Rahman, M. M. 2021. Military expenditure, financial development and environmental degradation in Turkey: a comparison of CO2 emissions and ecological footprint. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 986-997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1831

Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, No. 3914. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ritchie, H., Roser, M., Rosado, P. 2020. CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions (Accessed 25 October 2021).

Hassan, T., Khan, Y., He, C., Chen, J., Alsagr, N., Song, H. 2022. Environmental regulations, political risk and consumption-based carbon emissions: Evidence from OECD economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 320, 115893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115893

Hooks, G., Smith, C. L. 2004. The treadmill of destruction: National sacrifice areas and Native Americans. American Sociological Review, 69, 558-575.

Hou, N., Chen, B. 2014. Military expenditure and investment in OECD countries: Revisited. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 20(4), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2014-0031

Hussain, M., Dogan, E. 2021. The role of institutional quality and environment-related technologies in environmental degradation for BRICS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304, 127059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127059

IEA 2021. CO2 emissions, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021/co2-emissions (Accessed 10 October 2022).

IMF 2022. Access to macroeconomic & financial data. https://data.imf.org/?sk=f8032e80-b36c-43b1-ac26-493c5b1cd33b (Accessed 10 July 2022).

Institute for Economics & Peace 2022. Global Peace Index 2022: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney, June 2022. http://visionofhumanity.org/resources (Accessed 02 August 2022).

IPCC 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 616 pp. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781009157940.

Jorgenson, A. K., Clark, B. 2009. The economy, military, and ecologically unequal exchange relationships in comparative perspective: a panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1975-2000. Social Problems, 56(4), 621-646. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.621

Jorgenson, A. K., Clark, B., Givens, J. E. 2012. The environmental impacts of militarization in comparative perspective: an overlooked relationship. Nature and Culture, 7(3), 314-337. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2012.070304

Jorgenson, A. K., Clark, B., Kentor, J. 2010. Militarization and the environment: a panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970–2000. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.7

Kartal, M. T., Kılıç Depren, S., Kirikkaleli, D. 2023. Asymmetric effect of political stability on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK: long-run evidence from nonlinear ARDL and frequency domain causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 33886-33897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24550-z

Kartal, M. T., Samour, A., Adebayo, T. S., & Depren, S. K. (2023). Do nuclear energy and renewable energy surge environmental quality in the United States? New insights from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles approach. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 155, 104509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104509

Katircioğlu, S. T., Taşpinar, N. 2017. Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 572-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.127

Khan, S., Khan, M. K., Muhammad, B. 2021a. Impact of financial development and energy consumption on environmental degradation in 184 countries using a dynamic panel model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 9542-9557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11239-4

Khan, L., Arif, I. Waqar, S. 2021b. The Impact of Military Expenditure on External Debt: The Case of 35 Arms Importing Countries, Defence and Peace Economics, 32(5), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2020.1723239

Khan, M. 2023. Shifting Gender Roles in Society and the Workplace: Implications for Environmental Sustainability. Politica, 1(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7634130

Knight, A., Hastey, J. 2022. The danger of emergent opportunities: Perverse Incentives, climate change, and Arctic shipping. Global Perspectives, 3(1), 35490. https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2022.35490

Konuk, F., Kaya, E., Akpınar, S., Yıldız, S. 2023. The relationship between military expenditures, financial development and environmental pollution in G7 Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01122-1

Lahiani, A. 2020. Is financial development good for the environment? An asymmetric analysis with CO2 emissions in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 7901-7909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07467-y

Narayan, P. K., Narayan, S. 2010. Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005

NATO. 2022a. Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2022), https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/220627-def-exp-2022-en.pdf (Accessed 01 July 2022).

NATO. 2022b. Environment, climate change and security https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_91048.htm. (accessed 26 August 2022).

OECD. 2022. Innovation and Technology. https://data.oecd.org/innovation-and-technology.htm (Accessed 01 July 2022).

Opoku, E. E. O., Aluko, O. A. 2021. Heterogeneous effects of industrialization on the environment: evidence from panel quantile regression. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.015

Our World in Data. 2022. https://ourworldindata.org/ (accessed 25 August 2022).

Pieroni, L. 2009. Military expenditure and economic growth. Defence and Peace Economics, 20(4), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690701589876

Pata, U. K. 2018a. Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236

Pata, U. K. 2018b. The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy, 160, 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095

Pata, U. K. 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve and trade openness in Turkey: bootstrap ARDL approach with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(20), 20264-20276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05266-z

Pata, U. K., Yilanci, V. 2020. Financial development, globalization and ecological footprint in G7: further evidence from threshold cointegration and fractional frequency causality tests. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 27(4), 803-825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00467-z

Pata, U. K., Hizarci, A. E. 2022. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in the five most complex countries: Insights from a modified ecological footprint model. Energy & Environment, 0958305X221120255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221120255

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.

Pesaran, M. H. 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951

Pesaran, M. H. 2015. Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric reviews, 34(6-10), 1089-1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623

Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., Yamagata, T. 2008. A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x

Rafique, M. Z., Li, Y., Larik, A. R., Monaheng, M. P. 2020. The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 23899-23913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2

Rahman, H. U., Ghazali, A., Bhatti, G. A., Khan, S. U. 2020. Role of economic growth, financial development, trade, energy and FDI in environmental Kuznets curve for Lithuania: evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Engineering Economics, 31(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.1.22087

Rasiah, R. 2018. Evaluating the impact of financial and economic factors on environmental degradation. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(6), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.7111

Rjoub, H., Odugbesan, J. A., Adebayo, T. S., Wong, W. K. 2021. Sustainability of the moderating role of financial development in the determinants of environmental degradation: evidence from Turkey. Sustainability, 13, 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041844

Saba, C. S. Ngepah, N. 2020. Convergence in military expenditure and economic growth in Africa and its regional economic communities: evidence from a club clustering algorithm, Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1832344. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1832344

Sadorsky, P. 2010. The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 38, 2528–2535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.048

Saidi, K., Mbarek, M. B. 2017. The impact of income, trade, urbanization, and financial development on CO2 emissions in 19 emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 12748-12757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6303-3

Sanders-Zakre, A. 2020. Nuclear weapons worsen the climate crisis, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/16/nuclear-weapons-worsen-the-climate-crisis (Accessed 20 November 2021).

Seetanah, B., Sannassee, R. V., Fauzel, S., Soobaruth, Y., Giudici, G., Nguyen, A. P. H. 2019. Impact of economic and financial development on environmental degradation: Evidence from Small Island Developing States (SIDS), Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(2). 308-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1519696

Shahbaz, M., Dube, S., Ozturk, I., Jalil, A. 2015a. Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Portugal. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(2), 475-481.

Shahbaz, M., Farhani, S., Ozturk, I. 2015b. Do coal consumption and industrial development increase environmental degradation in China and India?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 3895-3907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3613-1

Shahbaz, M., Nasir, M. A., Roubaud, D. 2018. Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Economics, 74, 843-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020

Shahbaz, M., Haouas, I., Sohag, K., Ozturk, I. 2020. The financial development-environmental degradation nexus in the United Arab Emirates: the importance of growth, globalization and structural breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 10685-10699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07085-8

Shahbaz, M., Tiwari, A. K., Nasir, M. 2013. The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy, 61, 1452-1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.006

Sharif, A., Kartal, M. T., Bekun, F. V., Pata, U. K., Foon, C. L., Depren, S. K. 2023. Role of green technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: Insights from sovereign Nordic countries by CS-ARDL approach. Gondwana Research, 117, 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.009

Shen, Y., Su, Z. W., Malik, M. Y., Umar, M., Khan, Z., Khan, M. 2021. Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China. Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142538

Sheraz, M., Deyi, X., Ahmed, J., Ullah, S., Ullah, A. 2021. Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 35126-35144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13116-0

Shittu, W., Adedoyin, F. F., Shah, M. I., Musibau, H. O. 2021. An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: Evidence from Asia. Resources Policy, 73, 102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102227

SIPRI. 2021. SIPRI Yearbook 2021: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. https://www.sipri.org/ (Accessed 20 October 2022).

SIPRI. 2022. Military Expenditure Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex (Accessed 3 July 2022).

Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., Alvarado, R. 2020. Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118549

Smith, R. P. 1980. Military expenditure and investment in OECD countries, 1954–1973. Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-5967(80)90050-5

Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I. 2018. Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector: evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 30949-30961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3060-5

Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C., Low, S. 2023. The next climate war? Statecraft, security, and weaponization in the geopolitics of a low-carbon future. Energy Strategy Reviews, 45, 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101031

Steichen, L. Koshgarian, L. 2020. No warming, no war: How militarism fuels the climate crisis and vice versa. Institute for Policy Studies. https://apo.org.au/node/303507 (Accessed 20 February 2023).

Sweijs, T., De Haan, M., & Van Manen, H. (2022). Unpacking the climate security nexus seven pathologies link ing climate change to violent conflict. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies.

Tahir, T., Luni, T., Majeed, M. T., Zafar, A. 2021. The impact of financial development and globalization on environmental quality: evidence from South Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 8088-8101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11198-w

Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., Vadlamannati, K. C. 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy policy, 37(1), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025

To, A. H., Ha, D. T. T., Nguyen, H. M., Vo, D. H. 2019. The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: evidence from emerging markets in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091636

Ullah, S., Andlib, Z., Majeed, M. T., Sohail, S., Chishti, M. Z. 2021. Asymmetric effects of militarization on economic growth and environmental degradation: fresh evidence from Pakistan and India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 9484-9497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11142-y

Usman, M., Hammar, N. 2021. Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 15519-15536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z

Usman, O., Iorember, P. T., Olanipekun, I. O. 2019. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: the effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 13390-13400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z

Usman, A., Ozturk, I., Naqvi, S. M. M. A., Ullah, S., Javed, M. I. 2022. Revealing the nexus between nuclear energy and ecological footprint in STIRPAT model of advanced economies: Fresh evidence from novel CS-ARDL model. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 148, 104220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104220

Villanthenkodath, M. A., Mahalik, M. K. 2022. Technological innovation and environmental quality nexus in India: Does inward remittance matter?. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2291. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2291

Westerlund, J. 2008. Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967

World Bank. 2021. World Development Indicator, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD (Accessed 10 October 2022).

Xinmin, W., Hui, P., Hafeez, M., Aziz, B., Akbar, M. W., Mirza, M. A. 2020. The nexus of environmental degradation and technology innovation and adoption: an experience from dragon. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13, 1119-1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00868-w

Yahaya, N. S., Hussaini, M., Bashir, A. B. 2020. Population Growth and Environmental Degradation in Nigeria. Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 6(1), 31-35.

Zaidi, S. A. H., Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., Hou, F. 2019. Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210

Zaman, K. 2023a. Navigating the paradox of democracy and military control: An analysis of an imaginary country's political landscape. Politica, 1(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7645587

Zaman, K. 2023b. A note on cross-panel data techniques. Latest Developments in Econometrics, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7565625

Zandi, G., Haseeb, M., Abidin, I. S. Z. 2019. The impact of democracy, corruption and military expenditure on environmental degradation: evidence from top six Asean countries. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7443

Zeqiraj, V., Sohag, K., Soytas, U. 2020. Stock market development and low-carbon economy: The role of innovation and renewable energy. Energy Economics, 91, 104908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104908