Tariffs and Innovation in a Schumpeterian Economy with North-South Technology Transfer

Ho, Florence Ut Meng (2023): Tariffs and Innovation in a Schumpeterian Economy with North-South Technology Transfer.

Abstract

This paper develops a North-South quality-ladder model with northern innovative R&D, southern adaptive R&D and imitative R&D to analyze the effects of tariffs on innovation, technology transfer, relative wage and welfare. We find that increasing southern tariff decreases the relative wage between the North and the South permanently, increases the technology transfer rate permanently and decreases the northern innovation rate temporarily. In contrast, increasing northern tariff increases the relative wage permanently, decreases the technology transfer rate permanently and either increases or decreases the northern innovation rate, depending on the size of the North-South labor ratio. Moreover, we calibrate this model to the US-China data to perform a quantitative analysis. We find that imposing tariff in the home country yields welfare gain in itself and yields welfare loss in the foreign country. When both countries impose tariffs simultaneously, they can benefit from the welfare gains. The numerical results are consistent with the analytical policy implications.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Tariffs; Technology Transfer; Innovation; Foreign Direct Investment; Product Cycles.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance

References

Acemoglu, D. and Akcigit, U. (2012). Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10 (1), 1–42.

Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. and Vickers, J. (2001). Competition, imitation and growth with step- by-step innovation. The Review of Economic Studies, 68 (3), 467–492.

Akcigit, U., Ates, S. T. and Impullitti, G. (2018). Innovation and trade policy in a globalized world. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

Beladi, H., Chen, P.-h., Chu, H., Lai, C.-c. and Lai, T.-w. (2021). Optimal tariffs in a two-country r&d- based growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, pp. 1–25.

Caballero, R. J. and Jaffe, A. B. (1993). How high are the giants’ shoulders: An empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. NBER macroeconomics annual, 8, 15–74.35

Chen, H.-J. (2018). Innovation and imitation in a product-cycle model with fdi and cash-in-advance constraints. Journal of Macroeconomics, 58, 91–114.

Chu, A. C., Cozzi, G., Furuakwa, Y. and Liao, C.-H. (2019). Inflation and innovation in a schumpeterian economy with north-south technology transfer. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 51 (2-3), 683–719.

Cozzi, G., Giordani, P. E. and Zamparelli, L. (2007). The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136 (1), 788–797.

Dinopoulos, E. and Segerstrom, P. S. (2006). North-south trade and economic growth. CEPR Discussion Paper. — and Syropoulos, C. (1997). Tariffs and schumpeterian growth. Journal of International Economics, 42 (3-4), 425–452.

Felbermayr, G., Jung, B. and Larch, M. (2013). Optimal tariffs, retaliation, and the welfare loss from tariff wars in the melitz model. Journal of International Economics, 89 (1), 13–25.

Grieben, W.-H. (2005). A schumpeterian north–south growth model of trade and wage inequality. Review of International Economics, 13 (1), 106–128.

— and S ̧ener, F. (2009). Globalization, rent protection institutions, and going alone in freeing trade. European Economic Review, 53 (8), 1042–1065.

Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2018). Growth, trade, and inequality. Econometrica, 86 (1), 37–83.

— and Lai, E. L.-C. (2004). International protection of intellectual property. American Economic Review, 94 (5), 1635–1653.

Gustafsson, P. and Segerstrom, P. S. (2011). North-south trade with multinational firms and increasing product variety. International Economic Review, 52 (4), 1123–1155.

Hu, R., Yang, Y. and Zheng, Z. (2021). Inflation, endogenous quality increment, and economic growth. Mathematical Social Sciences, 114, 72–86.

Impullitti, G. and Licandro, O. (2018). Trade, firm selection and innovation: The competition channel.The Economic Journal, 128 (608), 189–229.

Iwaisako, T. (2013). Welfare effects of patent protection and productive public services: Why do developing countries prefer weaker patent protection? Economics Letters, 118 (3), 478–481.

— and Tanaka, H. (2020). Tariffs and foreign direct investment in a north–south product cycle model. Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP) Osaka University Discussion Papers In Economics And Business, 20, 1–36.

Jones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. (2000). Too much of a good thing? the economics of investment in r&d. Journal of Economic Growth, 5 (1), 65–85.36

Lee, S.-F. (2011). Tariff, growth, and welfare. Review of International Economics, 19 (2), 260–276.

Martin, A. and Vergote, W. (2008). On the role of retaliation in trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 76 (1), 61–77.

Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71 (6), 1695–1725.

Naito, T. (2006a). Growth, revenue, and welfare effects of tariff and tax reform: Win–win–win strategies. Journal of Public Economics, 90 (6-7), 1263–1280.

— (2006b). Tariff and tax reform: Dynamic implications. Journal of International Economics, 68 (2), 504–517.

Osang, T. and Pereira, A. (1996). Import tariffs and growth in a small open economy. Journal of Public Economics, 60 (1), 45–71.

Ossa, R. (2014). Trade wars and trade talks with data. American Economic Review, 104 (12), 4104–46.

Riverabatiz, L. A. and Romer, P. M. (1991). International trade with endogenous technological change. European Economic Review, 35 (4), 971–1001.

Segerstrom, P. S. (1998). Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88 (5), 1290–1310.

— (2000). The long-run growth effects of r&d subsidies. Journal of Economic Growth, 5 (3), 277–305.

Venables, A. J. (1987). Trade and trade policy with differentiated products: A chamberlinian-ricardian model. The Economic Journal, 97 (387), 700–717.

Young, A. (1991). Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 369–405.

Zheng, Z., Huang, C.-Y. and Yang, Y. (2020). Patent protection, innovation, and technology transfer in a schumpeterian economy. European Economic Review, 129, 103531.