On the estimation of the food poverty line

Amendola, Nicola (2023): On the estimation of the food poverty line.

Abstract

The paper compares two alternative methods of estimating the food poverty line, the “food basket method” (FB) and the “minimum cost method” (MC), and it shows that under plausible restrictions on households’ preferences and consumption behavior the FB method tends to overestimate the food poverty line with respect to the MC method. The overestimation is also transmitted to the poverty line to an extent that depends on the food expenditure share, the elasticity of the non-food expenditure share with respect to food expenditure and the elasticity of total expenditure with respect to food expenditure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Poverty Measurement, Welfare
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Deaton, A. and S. Zaidi, (2002) “Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis.” LSMS Working Paper no. 135.

Decerf, B, (2023), A Meta-Theory for Absolute Poverty Lines, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, n. 10519

Kakwani (2003), Issue in setting absolute poverty lines, Asian Development Bank

Prais, S.J., (1955), “Measuring social mobility”, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser A Gen. 118(1), 56–66

Ravallion, M., (1994), Poverty Comparisons. London: Routledge

Ravallion, M., (1998), Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice. LSMS Working Paper No. 133. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Ravallion, M., (2016), The Economics of Poverty. History, Measurement and Policy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ravallion, M. and B. Bidani, (1994), "How Robust is a Poverty Profile?" World Bank Economic Review 8: 75-102.