Bratanova, Alexandra and Cameron, Alicia and Thavat, Maylee and Fyfield, Amelia and Hajkowicz, Stefan (2023): Priority setting in international trade – application of multiple criteria decision analysis for Australian-Indonesia trade in the health sector.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_119407.pdf Download (557kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We demonstrate a use case of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in collaboration with industry stakeholders in forums as a way in which governments can undertake a 'soft' industry policy in international trade given the complex and changing global environment, and facilitate, rather than steer, the prioritisation of sector-specific facilitation. International trade is increasingly a balancing act with multiple competing objectives including security with open competition, economic growth with inclusion, and social and environmental protection. Post-pandemic, government efforts to stimulate export-led recovery and refine trade priorities within the rule bound by members of the World Trade Organisation are set to ramp up. To assist governments, guide their limited resources we advocate for the use of MCDA to assist with greater trade policy transparency and enable strategic decision making between multiple stakeholders While MCDA is often used in areas such as healthcare and environmental resourcing, it is not widely used in international trade. We demonstrate the use of MCDA to determine potential trade priorities in the healthcare sector under the Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. MCDA was applied in real-time during online workshops hosted by Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade with 38 industry stakeholders. The pilot determined clear priorities for trade promotion in a transparent process. These are discussed along with the potential to further develop and apply MCDA and the limitations of the analysis for effective use in international trade.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Priority setting in international trade – application of multiple criteria decision analysis for Australian-Indonesia trade in the health sector. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | multiple criteria decision analysis; international trade; Australia; Indonesia; healthcare |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I10 - General |
Item ID: | 119407 |
Depositing User: | Dr Alexandra Bratanova |
Date Deposited: | 23 Dec 2023 08:47 |
Last Modified: | 23 Dec 2023 08:48 |
References: | Bratanova A, Cameron L, Thavat M, Fyfield A, Quach Thaichon S, Pham H, Hajkowicz S (2023). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Trade Promotion. ANZMAC 2023 (Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference); Dunedin, New Zealand: Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy p322-324. Belke A, Gros D (2019). The slowdown in trade: end of the “globalisation hype” and a return to normal?*. Journal of Economics and Finance. IMF, WB, WTO (2017). Making trade an engine for growth for all: The case for trade and for policies to facilitate adjustment. Alcalá F, Ciccone A (2004). Trade and Productivity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2): 613-646. Frankel J A, Romer D H (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic Review, 89(3): 379-399. Feyrer J (2019). Trade and Income—Exploiting Time Series in Geography. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4): 1-35. Baier S L, Bergstrand J H, Bruno J P (2019). Putting Canada in the penalty box: Trade and welfare effects of eliminating North American Free Trade Agreement. World Economy, 42(12): 3488-3514. Ghosh S, Yamarik S (2004). Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Journal of International Economics, 63(2): 369-395. Baier S L, Bergstrand J H (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1): 72-95. Ezzat A, Zaki C (2022). On the political economy of trade agreements: A de jure and de facto analysis of institutions. International Economics, 172: 143-156. Álvarez I C, Barbero J, Rodríguez-Pose A, Zofío J L (2018). Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework. World Development, 103: 72-87. Roberts A, Koskenniemi M (2017). Is International Law International? New York: Oxford University Press. Shaffer G (2018). Retooling Trade Agreements for Social Inclusion. Macroeconomics: Employment. WTO, ILO (2017). Investing in skills for inclusive trade. Langot F, Merola R, Oh S (2022). Can taxes help ensure a fair globalization? International Economics, 171: 191-213. Naughtin C, Hajkowicz S, Schleiger E, Bratanova A, Cameron A, Zamin T, Dutta A (2022). Our Future World: Global megatrends impacting the way we live over coming decades. Brisbane, Australia: Hajkowicz S, Bratanova A, Schleiger E, Brosnan A (2020). Global trade and investment megatrends: Exploring opportunities and risks for the Australian economy during and after the COVID-19 crisis with strategic foresight. Brisbane, Australia: EY Global (2021). Why pandemic-induced trade protectionism will affect tax for years. McDonagh N, Draper P (2020). Industrial subsidies, state-owned enterprises and WTO reform: prospects for cooperation? DFAT (2017). Foreign Policy White Paper. Warwick K (2013). Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 2. OECD Publishing, Paris: DCLC (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Bratanova A (2015). Development of tools for economic analysis for public sector programs in Russia: a case study of the energy efficiency program in Moscow. uq.edu.au: Holtorf A-P, Kristin E, Assamawakin A, Upakdee N, Indrianti R, Apinchonbancha N (2021). Case studies for implementing MCDA for tender and purchasing decisions in hospitals in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 14(1): 52. Bratanova A, Ford J, Schleiger E (2023). Prioritising Investment Opportunities in Research and Development Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. SSRN (Social Sciences Research Network), 25 February 2023. Golan O, Hansen P (2012). Which health technologies should be funded? A prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1(1): 44. Marsh K, Lanitis T, Neasham D, Orfanos P, Caro J (2014). Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature. PharmacoEconomics, 32(4): 345-365. Sullivan T, Hansen P (2017). Determining Criteria and Weights for Prioritizing Health Technologies Based on the Preferences of the General Population: A New Zealand Pilot Study. Value in Health, 20(4): 679-686. Goetghebeur M M, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt R J, Erickson L J, Rindress D (2008). Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking – the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Services Research, 8(1): 270. Inotai A, Nguyen H T, Hidayat B, Nurgozhin T, Kiet P H T, Campbell J D, Németh B, Maniadakis N, Brixner D, Wijaya K, Kaló Z (2018). Guidance toward the implementation of multicriteria decision analysis framework in developing countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 18(6): 585-592. Inotai A, Brixner D, Maniadakis N, Dwiprahasto I, Kristin E, Prabowo A, Yasmina A, Priohutomo S, Németh B, Wijaya K, Kalo Z (2018). Development of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for off-patent pharmaceuticals - an application on improving tender decision making in Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res, 18(1): 1003. Ahsan A, Kramer E, Adani N, Muhammad A, Amalia N (2021). The politics of funding universal healthcare: Diverting local tobacco taxes to subsidise the national health scheme in Indonesia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 8(3): 351-366. De Nardo P, Gentilotti E, Mazzaferri F, et al (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritize hospital admission of patients affected by COVID-19 in low-resource settings with hospital-bed shortage. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 98: 494-500. OPG (2009). Making decisions: A guide for people who work in health and social care. Marsh K, IJzerman M, Thokala P, et al. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making-emerging good practices: report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health, 19(2): 125-137. Sullivan T, Hansen P (2016). PHP110 - Determining Criteria and Weights for Prioritising Health Technologies Based on the Preferences of the General Population: A New Zealand Pilot Study. Value in Health, 19(7): A832. Mardani A, Jusoh A, Md Nor K, Khalifah Z, Zakwan N, Valipour A (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1): 516-571. Mardani A, Zavadskas E K, Khalifah Z, Zakuan N, Jusoh A, Nor K M, Khoshnoudi M (2017). A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71: 216-256. Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas E K, Cavallaro F, Khalifah Z (2015). Sustainable and renewable Energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(10): 13947-13984. Pohekar S D, Ramachandran M (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4): 365-381. Streimikiene D, Balezentis T, Krisciukaitien I, Balezentis A (2012). Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5): 3302-3311. Spengler T, Geldermann J, Hähre S, Sieverdingbeck A, Rentz O (1998). Development of a multiple criteria based decision support system for environmental assessment of recycling measures in the iron and steel making industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 6(1): 37-52. Dooley A E, Smeaton D C, Sheath G W, Ledgard S F (2009). Application of multiple criteria decision analysis in the New Zealand agricultural industry. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 16(1‐2): 39-53. Saripalli P, Pingali G (2011). MADMAC: Multiple attribute Decision methodology for Adoption of clouds. Proceedings - 2011 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD 2011; p316-323. Jahan A, Edwards K L (2013). 'Chapter 3 - Multi-criteria Decision-Making for Materials Selection' In: Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Selection of Engineering Materials in Product Design, Jahan Ali & Edwards Kevin L. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Kabir G, Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2014). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(9): 1176-1210. Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4-5): 167-186. Yang D, Jiang L, Ng A K Y (2018). One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117: 190-204. Assanbayeva A (2017). Internationalisation towards emerging markets: an MCDA perspective on the case of Italian furniture firms in CIS countries. Italy: Università Ca' Foscari Venezia. Deshpande P C, Skaar C, Brattebø H, Fet A M (2020). Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway. Science of the Total Environment, 719. Rehman S T, Khan S A, Kusi-Sarpong S, Hassan S M (2018). Supply chain performance measurement and improvement system. Journal of Modelling in Management, 13(3): 522-549. Chorfi Z, Berrado A, Benabbou L (2015). Selection of Key Performance Indicators for Supply Chain monitoring using MCDA. 2015 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications (SITA); p1-6. Della Bruna Jr E, Ensslin L, Rolim Ensslin S (2014). An MCDA-C application to evaluate supply chain performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 44(7): 597-616. de Lima Silva D F, Silva J C S, Silva L G O, Ferreira L, de Almeida-Filho A T (2018). Sovereign Credit Risk Assessment with Multiple Criteria Using an Outranking Method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018: 8564764. DFAT (2020). Australia's free trade agreement with Indonesia to provide export boost. Media release by Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment (5 July 2020). DFAT (2022). Free trade agreements in force. WTO (2021). Regional Trade Agreements Database (accessed 20 February 2021) WTO (2022). Regional Trade Agreements Database. Thavat M, Narayanamurti M, Deane S, Ekram A, Armstrong B, Bishop A, Lee S, Cameron A, Bratanova A, Hajkowicz S, Fyfield A, al e (2021). Chapter 7: Health and aged care in "Blueprint for Trade and Investment with Indonesia" (DFAT). Asialink, MTPConnect (2020). Digital Health in Indonesia: Opportunities for Australia. March 2020. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/119407 |