Assessing Pandemic-Related Risks and Resilience of Danish Workforce: A Methodological Approach

Javakhishvili-Larsen, Nino and Bøje-Kovács, Bence János and Geerdsen, Lars Pico (2023): Assessing Pandemic-Related Risks and Resilience of Danish Workforce: A Methodological Approach.

Abstract

The restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic brought repercussions for the employees. Most of the workplaces had to temporarily lockdown as a preventive measure to the virus spread. Those individuals who were able to continue working remotely faced a lower risk of job loss compared to those persons who could not. The main question, however, revolves around assessing risks and identifying resilient workers during these restrictive phases of the pandemic.

In this article, we propose a new Work-From-Home (WFH) index designed to assess individuals' likelihood of working from home. Utilizing quarterly Labour Force Survey data on the actual extent of remote work among Danish workers from 2008 to 2021, this new index can be employed in any dataset with access to the International Standard Classification of Occupation codes. A comparative analysis is conducted with the commonly applied indexes – the Home Office Index (HOI) and Lockdown Index (LDI) suggested by Faber et al. (2020) and Dingel and Neiman (2020). Our findings reveal that the WFH index offers greater variations by occupations, accounting for diverse outcomes of remote work across different economic sectors.

Using Pooled OLS models, the study examines factors influencing resilience and lockdown risks, considering demographics, socioeconomic status, residential location, and industry-related aspects. The results highlight the WFH index's accuracy in measuring remote work possibilities, providing a better-fitted model than in the case of HOI. The findings indicate that notably, male workers in middle to top-level positions, particularly in publicly-owned workplaces, exhibit positive outcomes in remote working and lower lockdown risks. This article not only contributes to future research on labour force resilience but also provides supplementary material for easy application to study labour market changes even in cases with limited data in other countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Methodology, Remote Working, Work-From-Home, Lockdown, Pandemic Restrictions, Occupation ISCO
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J01 - Labor Economics: General

References

Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2022). Working from home around the world (No. w30446). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Alstadsæter, A., Bratsberg, B., Eielsen, G., Kopczuk, W., Markussen, S., Raaum, O., & Røed, K. (2020). The first weeks of the coronavirus crisis: Who got hit, when and why? Evidence from Norway (No. w27131). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Beland, L. P., Brodeur, A., & Wright, T. (2020). COVID-19, stay-at-home orders and employment: Evidence from CPS data.

Block, J. H., Fisch, C., & Hirschmann, M. (2021). The determinants of bootstrap financing in crises: evidence from entrepreneurial ventures in the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Business Economics, 1-19.

Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: How the new communications revolution will change our lives. Orion Business.

Delventhal, M. J., Kwon, E., & Parkhomenko, A. (2022). JUE Insight: How do cities change when we work from home?. Journal of Urban Economics, 127, 103331.

Dingel, J.I. and Neiman, B., 2020. How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, 189, pp. 104235.

EUROSTAT (2017) EU Labour Force Survey. Explanatory Notes (To be applied from 2017Q1 onwards), EUROPEAN COMMISSION, UNIT F-3: Labour market and lifelong learning

EUROSTAT (2021), EU Labour Force Survey. Explanatory Notes (To be applied from 2021Q1 onwards), EUROPEAN COMMISSION, UNIT F-3: Labour market and lifelong learning

Faber, M., Ghisletta, A. and Schmidheiny, K., 2020. A lockdown index to assess the economic impact of the coronavirus. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 156(1)

Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern recognition letters, 27(8), 861-874.

Gallent, N., Stirling, P. Hamiduddin, I. (2023). Pandemic mobility, second homes and housing market change in a rural amenity area during COVID-19 – The Brecon Beacons National Park, Wales, Progress in Planning, Volume 172, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2022.100731.

Graham, S. (1998). The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298671334137.

Lindberg, M. R., Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Hartmann-Petersen, K., Kristensen, N. G., Christensen, T. H., & Grindsted, T. S. (2022) Pandemic Detours or New Sustainable Pathways? Post-pandemic Mobility Futures in Danish Cities. Applied Mobilities: 1-17 DOI: 10.1080/23800127.2022.2145081

LFS. Statistics Denmark, (2020) https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/nyt/NytHtml?cid=32435

Mongey, S., Pilossoph, L., & Weinberg, A. (2021). Which workers bear the burden of social distancing?. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 19, 509-526.

Neeley, T., 2021. Work revolution: Succeeding from anywhere. Harvard: Harvard Business School.

Pouliakas, K., & Branka, J. (2020). EU Jobs at highest risk of COVID-19 social distancing. CEDEFOP Working paper series No 1/May 2020, Luxembourg.

Ramani, A., & Bloom, N. (2021). The Donut effect of COVID-19 on cities (No. w28876). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Redmond, P., & McGuinness, S. (2020). Who can work from home in Ireland. ESRI Survey and Statistical Report series, 87.

Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C. & Beigi, M., 2022. Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners, Human Resource Development International, 25:2, 163-181, DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2022.2047380

Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macías, E., & Bisello, M. (2020). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? (No. 2020/05). JRC working papers series on labour, education and technology.

Statistics Denmark (2021): Hjemmearbejde fordoblet i 2020 (website). URL: https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyt/NytHtml?cid=32435

Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry 39:561-577