Is economic growth sustainable in the long run? The answer might not be obvious

Economou, George and Halkos, George (2024): Is economic growth sustainable in the long run? The answer might not be obvious.

Abstract

Natural resources provide ecosystem services to humans and society. Economic sectors use natural resources for economic benefits. Intense and uncontrolled economic activities and human intervention create adverse effects on the balance between all pillars of sustainability, namely the economy, environment, and society. In this context, researchers investigate potential causalities to provide inputs and insights into relevant decision-making processes and structure effective, applicable, and long-lasting plans and policies. These policies highlight the role of energy efficiency by accelerating the replacement of fossil fuels with renewables and minimizing greenhouse and carbon dioxide emissions. The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis and the energy growth nexus discussion offer research fields to determine whether growth creates environmental degradation or whether energy drives economic growth. Both approaches can be used under different methodological approaches using various indicators, groups of countries, and thematic fields. Research findings should accompany relevant practical implications for the business world and everyday life. These implications are expected to advance responsible consumptive behavior, the use of technological advancement, and a sustainability culture concerning households, organizations, and consumers. The key target is to bring a better future closer to our reality.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environment; energy; economy; sustainability.
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q40 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Adedoyin, F.F. Tourism-induced Environmental Kuznets Curve. In Encyclopedia of Tourism Management and Marketing; Buhalis, D.,Ed.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2022.

Alvarez-Herranz, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Cantos, J.M. Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 2017, 386–397.

Apergis, N.; Payne, J.E. The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Appl. Energy. 2011, 88, 343–347.

Apergis, N.; Christou, C.; Gupta, R. Are there Environmental Kuznets Curves for US state-level CO2 emissions? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 551–558.

Arnaut, J.; Lidman, J. Environmental Sustainability and Economic Growth in Greenland: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1228.

Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Alvarez-Herranz, A., Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 16478–16494.

Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Ibáñez-Luzón, L.; Usman, M.; Shahbaz, M. The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renew. Energy 2022, 185, 1441–1455.

Bloch, H.; Rafiq, S.; Salim, R. Economic growth with coal, oil and renewable energy consumption in China: Prospects for fuel substitution. Econ. Model. 2015, 44, 104–115.

Chen, Y. Factors influencing renewable energy consumption in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 605–615.

Cheng, Y.; Yao, X. Carbon intensity reduction assessment of renewable energy technology innovation in China: A panel data model with cross-section dependence and slope heterogeneity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110157.

Destek, M.A.; Aydın, S. An empirical note on tourism and sustainable development nexus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29,34515–34527.

Ding, X.; Liu, X. Renewable energy development and transportation infrastructure matters for green economic growth? Empirical evidence from China. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 79, 634–646.

Dong, K.; Sun, R.; Jiang, H.; Zeng, X. CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: What Roles Can Nuclear Energy and Renewable Energy Play? J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 51–63.

Ekonomou, G.; Halkos, G. Exploring the Impact of Economic Growth on the Environment: An Overview of Trends and Developments. Energies 2023a, 16, 4497.

Ekonomou, G.; Halkos, G. Is tourism growth a power of environmental ‘de -degradation’? An empirical analysis for Eurozone economic space. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023b, 77, 1016–1029.

Fachrurrozi, K.; Masbar, R.; Seftarita, C. Energy-growth-globalization (EGG) nexus in N-11 countries. Heliyon 2022, 8, e10522.

Fan, Y.; Hao, Y. An empirical research on the relationship amongst renewable energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment in China. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 598–609.

Fang, Y. Economic welfare impacts from renewable energy consumption: The China experience. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011,15, 5120–5128.

Fang, Z.; Chang, Y. Energy, human capital and economic growth in Asia Pacific countries— Evidence from a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Econ. 2016, 56, 177–184.

Halkos, G.E. Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: Evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2003, 8, 581–601.

Halkos, G.E.; Tzeremes, N.G. Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries’ environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 2168–2176.

Halkos, G. Exploring the economy–environment relationship in the case of sulfur emissions. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2013, 56, 159–177.

Halkos, G.; Paizanos, E.A. Environmental Macroeconomics: Economic Growth, Fiscal Spending and Environmental Quality. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2016, 9, 321–362.

Halkos, G.; Bousinakis, D. The effect of stress and dissatisfaction on employees during crisis. Economic Analysis and Policy 2017, 55, 25-34

Halkos, G.; Ekonomou, G. Can Business and Leisure Tourism Spending Lead to Lower Environmental Degradation Levels? Research on the Eurozone Economic Space. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6063.

He, Y.; Huang, P. Exploring the Forms of the Economic Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption: Evidence from China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8212.

Józwik, B.; Gavryshkiv, A.-V.; Kyophilavong, P.; Gruszecki, L.E. Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Case of Central Europe. Energies 2021, 14, 3415.

Khan, H.N.; Alrasheedi, M.; Shahzada, G. A dynamic multivariate causality analysis of energy–growth nexus using ARDL approach: A Malaysian energy policy perspective. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 735729.

Kim, J. Social dimension of sustainability: From community to social capital. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2018, 28, 175–181.

Lian, W.; Wang, B.; Gao, T.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, H. Coordinated Development of Renewable Energy: Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11122.

Lin, B.; Moubarak, M. Renewable energy consumption—Economic growth nexus for China Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 111–117.

Long, X.; Naminse, E.Y.; Du, J.; Zhuang, J. Nonrenewable energy, renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 680–688.

Marques, L.M.; Fuinhas, J.A.; Marques, A.C. On the restricted form of energy-growth nexus: A global level VECM approach and the historical structural breaks. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2020, 14, 1205–1220.

Menegaki, A.N.; Tugcu, C.A. Energy consumption and Sustainable Economic Welfare in G7 countries; A comparison with the conventional nexus. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017, 69, 892–901.

Menegaki, A.N.; Tugcu, C.A. Two versions of the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) in the energy-growth nexus for selected Asian countries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2018, 14, 21–35.

Mesagan, E.P.; Isola,W.A.; Ajide, K.B. The capital investment channel of environmental improvement: Evidence from BRICS. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2019, 21, 1561–1582.

Nguyen, H.M.; Ngoc, B.H. Energy Consumption—Economic Growth Nexus in Vietnam: An ARDL Approach with a Structural Break. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 101–110.

Numan, U.; Ma, B.; Saeed Meo, M.; Dino Bedru, H. Revisiting the N-shaped environmental kuznets curve for economic complexity and ecological footprint. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 365, 132642.

Olale, E.; Ochuodho, T.O.; Lantz, V.; El Armali, J. The environmental Kuznets curve model for greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 859–868.

Ozcan, B.; Ari, A. Nuclear Energy Consumption-Economic Growth Nexus in OECD: A Bootstrap Causality Test. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 30, 586–597.

Rahman, M.M. The dynamic nexus of energy consumption, international trade and economic growth in BRICS and ASEAN countries: A panel causality test. Energy 2021, 229, 120679.

Raza, S.A.; Jawaid, S.T.; Siddiqui, M.H. Electricity consumption and economic growth in South Asia. S. Asia Econ. J. 2016, 17, 200–215.

Saidi, K.; Mbarek, M.B. Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: Evidence from panel Granger causality tests. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2016, 88, 364–374.

Sarkodie, S.A.; Strezov, V. Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 201, 98–110.

Sarkodie, S.A.; Adams, S.; Owusu, P.A.; Leirvik, T.; Ozturk, I. Mitigating degradation and emissions in China: The role of environmental sustainability, human capital and renewable energy. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 719, 137530.

Shahbaz, M.; Song, M.; Ahmad, M.; Vinh Vo, X. Does economic growth stimulate energy consumption? The role of human capital and R&D expenditures in China. Energy Econ. 2022, 105, 105662.

Simionescu, M. The renewable and nuclear energy-economic growth nexus in the context of quality of governance. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2023, 157, 104590. [

Sun, X.; Lian, W.; Duan, H.; Wang, A. Factors affecting wind power efficiency: Evidence from provincial-level data in China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12759.

Szczuka, M. Social dimension of sustainability in CSR standards. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFE 2015. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 4800–4807.

Tugcu, C. T. Tourism and economic growth nexus revisited: A panel causality analysis for the case of the Mediterranean region. Tour. Manag.,2014, 42, 207–212.

Voumik, L.C.; Hossain, M.I.; Rahman, M.H.; Sultana, R.; Dey, R.; Esquivias, M.A. Impact of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy on EKC in SAARC Countries: Augmented Mean Group Approach. Energies 2023, 16, 2789.

Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Zou, J. Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957–2000. Energy 2005, 30, 73–83.

Wang, Y.; He, X. Spatial economic dependency in the Environmental Kuznets Curve of carbon dioxide: The case of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 498–510.

Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Ji, Q.; Shi, X. Regional renewable energy development in China: A multidimensional assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 124, 109797.

Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q. The relationship of renewable energy consumption to financial development and economic growth in China. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 897–904.

Yalta, A.T.; Cakar, H. Energy consumption and economic growth in China: A reconciliation. Energy Policy 2012, 41, 666–675.

Yoo, S.H.; Ku, S.J. Causal relationship between nuclear energy consumption and economic growth: A multi-country analysis. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 1905–1913.