Collaboration and SDG-related research at the University of Stavanger

Brökel, Heike and Broekel, Tom (2023): Collaboration and SDG-related research at the University of Stavanger.

Abstract

This report offers a comprehensive exploration of research collaboration at the University of Stavanger (UiS) and its alignment with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Drawing from the Cristin database, the analysis provides a detailed perspective on the evolving academic activities and collaborative patterns at UiS. Key findings include: International Collaboration: A pronounced shift towards collaborations involving external researchers underscores UiS’s move towards an internationalized research environment. Intra-UiS Collaboration: While collaborations within individual departments thrive, signifying the strength of close-knit research communities, broader interdisciplinary col- laborations spanning faculties remain relatively rare. Network Dynamics: The internal collaboration network at UiS has evolved from isolated clusters to a more integrated framework. Researchers serving as central nodes or ‘hubs’ play a pivotal role in connecting diverse clusters, signifying a move towards a more interconnected academic ecosystem. SDG Alignment: A strong correlation was observed between the nature of collaborations and SDG alignment. Interdisci- plinary collaborations often produce outputs resonating with SDGs, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of these goals. Moreover, researchers with central positions in the collaboration network significantly influence SDG-aligned outputs. Language Preference: English has progressively emerged as the preferred medium for research outputs, marking a trend towards global academic resonance. In essence, the report illuminates the multifaceted dynamics of research collaboration at UiS, emphasizing the potential for bolstering interdisciplinary endeavors and underscoring the critical roles individual researchers play in shaping UiS’s contributions to global sustainability goals.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Stavanger, university, networks, sustainability
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

References

Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press.

Barabasi, A., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica, A 311(3–4), 590–614.

Boschma, R. A., & ter Wal, A. L. J. (2007). Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the south of Italy. Industry and Innovation, 14(2), 177–199. https://doi.org /10.1080/13662710701253441

Broekel, T., & Mueller, W. (2018). Critical links in knowledge networks – What about proximities and gatekeeper organisations? Industry and Innovation, 10(1), 919–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1343130 Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.

Cottafava, D., Ascione, G. S., Corazza, L., & Dhir, A. (2022). Sustainable development goals research in higher education institutions: An interdisciplinarity assessment through an entropy-based indicator. Journal of Business Research, 151, 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.050

David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–.

DiVito, L., van Wijk, J., & Wakkee, I. (2021). Governing Collaborative Value Creation in the Context of Grand Chal- lenges: A Case Study of a Cross-Sectoral Collaboration in the Textile Industry. Business and Society, 60(5), 1092–1131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320930657

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ”Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. http://www.sciencedire ct.com/science/article/B6V77-3YTBY18-1/2/ab127cd03fde732424995b91cd0cba1e

Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Matrix, 1(1968), 215–239.

Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross- disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., Schlägel, C., & Welpe, I. M. (2020). Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation. Industry and Innovation, 27(9), 953–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1713733

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Meier, D. S., Mata, R., & Wulff, D. U. (2021). text2sdg: An R package to Monitor Sustainable Development Goals from Text. 20, 1–10. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05856 Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011

Pudelko, M., & Tenzer, H. (2019). Boundaryless Careers or Career Boundaries? The Impact of Language Barriers on Academic Careers in International Business Schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0236

Thingnes, J. S. (2020). Making linguistic choices at a Sámi University: negotiating visions and demands. Current Issues in Language Planning, 21(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2019.1671712

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.

van Zanten, J. A., & van Tulder, R. (2021). Analyzing companies’ interactions with the Sustainable Development Goals through network analysis: Four corporate sustainability imperatives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2396–2420. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2753

Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099