Impact of Some Innovative Programmes for Improving Agricultural Productivity– A Study in Arid Zones of West Bengal, India

Jana, Sebak Kumar and Payra, Tapas and Manna, Siddhartha (2024): Impact of Some Innovative Programmes for Improving Agricultural Productivity– A Study in Arid Zones of West Bengal, India. Published in: "Rebuilding Arid Regions after COVID-19: Problems and Prospects in Asia-Pacific Region" , Book edited by Umar Benna (April 2022)

Abstract

India at present faces a daunting challenge to provide food security to the burgeoning population. Rainfed areas falling mostly in arid zones accounts 60% of the total cultivated area in India. More than one-third share of the total population in the arid zone of India is below the poverty line. There is an urgent need to explore the possibilities of adopting innovative techniques of production in agriculture in the arid zones. The present paper provides some cases of innovative technologies to improve agricultural productivity in the arid zones in India. The innovative technologies that have been considered here are Happa, System of Rice Intensification (SRI), rain shelter, and mango orchard. The paper highlights the economics of these technologies for tribal households in the study area of Nayagram Block in Jungle Mahal in the state of West Bengal in India. All these technologies have been found to be economically beneficial for the farmer households in the arid zones under study.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovative technology, SRI, Happa, Rain shelter, Orchard, Agricultural productivity, Arid Zone, India
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General

References

1. Adhikari, P., Sen, D., &Uphoff, N. (2010).System of Rice Intensification as a resource-conserving methodology: contributing to food security in an era of climate change. SATSA: State Agricultural Technologists Service Association, West Bengal, India. Annual Technical, (14), 26-44.

2. ArayaphongSupisra (2012). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Different Rice Cropping systems in Thailand.Master thesis in Sustainable Development at Uppsala University, No. XX, YY pp., 30 .

3. Aune Jens B, NagothuUdayaSekhar, KjellEsser and MehreteabTesfai (2014).Opportunities for Support to System of Rice Intensification in Tanzania, Zambia and MalawiReport commissioned by NORAD under the NMBU –Norad Frame Agreement.Noragric Report No. 71April 2014 Department of International Environment and Development Studies, NoragricFaculty of Social Sciences Norwegian University of Life Sciences.

4. Chapagain, T., Riseman, A., &Yamaji, E. (2011).Assessment of system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional practices under organic and inorganic management in Japan. Rice Science, 18(4), 311-320.

5. Dahal, K. R. (2014).System of Rice Intensification (SRI): A Potential Approach to Enhance Rice Productivity and Food Security. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 12(1), 75-81.

6. Dhakal, M. P. (2005).Farmers’ evaluation of the System of Rice Intensification in the middle mountains of Nepal. Consultant’s report People and Resource Dynamics in Mountain Watersheds of the HKH (PARDYP)/International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal.

7. Ghosh, B., & Chakma, N. (2015). Impacts of rice intensification system on two CD blocks of Barddhaman district, West Bengal. Current Science, 342-346.

8. Gujja, B., &Thiyagarajan, T. M. (2009). New Hope for Indian Food Security?: The System of Rice Intensification. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

9. Hameed, K. A., Jaber, F. A., Hadi, A. Y., Elewi, J. A. H., &Uphoff, N. (2011). Application of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) methods on productivity of Jasmine rice variety in southern Iraq. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 173(798), 1-16.

10. Ibrahim, B., & Ismail, W. I. W. (2014).Development of system rice intensification (SRI) paddy transplanter. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 6(2), 48-53.

11. Jana, Sebak Kumar (2017). Economic Impact Analysis of Some Innovative Programmes for Improving Agricultural Productivity of Tribal Households in Nayagram Block in Jungle Mahal in West Bengal.UGC Sponsored Minor Research Project, Vidyasagar University.

12. Jana, S. K., Manna, S. S., &Payra, T. (2017).Economic Impact Analysis of SRI Technology in Improving Agricultural Productivity of Tribal Households in Nayagram Block in Jungle Mahal in West Bengal.Scholars Journal ofEconomics, Businessand Management, March, 2017,SAS Publishers, pp.132-139.

13. Jana, Sebak Kumar (2011).Sustainable Small Scale Irrigation Experiment in the Dry Zones: A Case Study on Happa (Small Tank) Model in the State of West Bengal, India.Presented in APN Conference on “Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Asia”, at University of Malaya, Malaysia, during 9-11 January 2011. Available online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29553/

14. Kamboj, B.R., Kumar, A., Bishnoi, D.K., Singla, K., Kumar, V., Jat, M.L., Chaudhary, N.,Jat, H.S.,Gosain, D.K., Khippal, A., Garg, R., Lathwal, O.P., Goyal, S.P.,Goyal, N.K., Yadav, A.K., Malik, D.S., Mishra, A., Bhatia, R (2012), Direct Seeded Rice Technology in western Indo-Garngetic plains of India: CSISA Experiences.CSISA; IRRI; CIMMYT

15. Mahender Kumar, M., Somasekhar, N., Surekha, K., Padmavathi, C., Srinivas Prasad, M., RavindraBabu, V.,&Ramprasad, A. S. (2013).SRI-A method for sustainable intensification of rice production with enhanced water productivity. Agrotechnology, 1-7.

16. Lybbert Travis J and Robers Pierre Tescar (2013).Household-Level Impacts of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in Haiti: An SRI intervention with training, insured credit, and coordination by irrigation bloc.Research Proposal for BASIS Collaborative Research Support Program.April 2013

17. Nakano Yuko, Yuki Tanaka &Keijiro Otsuka (2014).Can ‘Contract Farming’ Increase Productivity of Small-Scale Cultivation in A Rain-fed Area in Tanzania?”, https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/14-21.html

18. Palada, M.C., Y.C. Roan, & L.L. Black (2003).Rain Shelters for Tomato Production in the Hot-Wet Seasonhttp://203.64.245.61/web_crops/tomato/Rain%20shelters%20for%20tomato%20production%20in%20the%20hot-wet%20season_A4.pdf

19. Pathak Jharna (2013)System of Rice Intensification Vs. Conventional System: A Case of Gujarat.International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science Technology.ISSN 2249-3050, Volume 4, Number 4 (2013), pp. 287-290.

20. Phiri G (2011). Rain shelters for tomato Production.JOVC, Kasma, Zambia.

21. Rao I.V.Y. Rama (2011). Estimation of Efficiency, Sustainability and Constraints in SRI (System of Rice Intensification) vis-à-vis Traditional Methods of Paddy Cultivation in North Coastal Zone of Andhra Pradesh. Agricultural Economics Research Review Vol. 24 July-December 2011 pp325-331.

22. Rappocciolo Francesca (2012). Spreading the system of rice intensification across East and Southern Africa. International Fund For Agricultural Development Via Paolo Di Dono, 44- 00142 Rome, Italy, November 2012.

23. Reddy Jayapal& SandhyaShenoy (2013). A comparative economic analysis of Traditional and System of Rice Intensification (SRI) rice cultivation practices in Mahabubnagar district of Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 10, October.

24. Styger, E., Attaher, M. A., Guindo, H., Ibrahim, H., Diaty, M., Abba, I., &Traore, M. System of Rice Intensification (SRI) versus farmer practice—A comparative evaluation in the Timbuktu region of Mali. Second Africa Rice Congress, Bamako, Mali: Innovation and Partnerships to Realize Africa’s Rice Potential.

25. Barison, J., &Uphoff, N. (2011).Rice yield and its relation to root growth and nutrient-use efficiency under SRI and conventional cultivation: an evaluation in Madagascar. Paddy and Water Environment, 9(1), 65-78.

26. Basavaraja, H., Mahajanashetti, S. B., &Sivanagaraju, P. (2008).Technological change in paddy production: A comparative analysis of traditional and SRI methods of cultivation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(902-2016-67976).

27. Sarala, A. &Chellappan, M. (2011).Comparison of the system of rice intensification (SRI), recommended practices, and farmers’ methods of rice (Oryzasativa L.) production in the humid tropics of Kerala, India. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 49, 64-71.

28. Senthilkumar, K., Bindraban, P. S., Thiyagarajan, T. M., De Ridder, N., &Giller, K. E. (2008). Modified rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India: yield gains and farmers’(lack of) acceptance. Agricultural Systems, 98(2), 82-94.

29. Sinha, S. K., &Talati, J. (2007). Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): A case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural water management, 87(1), 55-60.

30. Thomas, V., &Ramzi, A. M. (2011).SRI contributions to rice production dealing with water management constraints in northeastern Afghanistan. Paddy and Water Environment, 9(1), 101-109.

31. Uphoff, N., Kassam, A., & Harwood, R. (2011). SRI as a methodology for raising crop and water productivity: productive adaptations in rice agronomy and irrigation water management. Paddy and water environment, 9(1), 3-11.