Sartzetakis, Eftichis and Xepapadeas, Anastasios and Petrakis, Emmanuel (2008): The role of information provision as a policy instrument to supplement environmental taxes: Empowering consumers to choose optimally.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_12083.pdf Download (339kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The present paper examines, within a dynamic framework, the use of information provision as a policy instrument to supplement environmental taxation. We assume that at least a fraction of consumers do not posses the required information to make the optimal choices, and that their behavior at each time period depends on the accumulated stock of information. We show that, as the accumulated stock of information provision increases, both the optimal level of information provided at each period of time and the optimal tax rate decline over time. Our results provide strong evidence in support of information campaigns as a policy instrument to supplement traditional environmental policies. Information provision can sift the demand towards environmentally friendly products over time and thus, reduce the required level of the tax rate.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The role of information provision as a policy instrument to supplement environmental taxes: Empowering consumers to choose optimally |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Information provision, environmental taxes, policy instruments |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation |
Item ID: | 12083 |
Depositing User: | Anastasios Xepapadeas |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2008 18:17 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:40 |
References: | 1.Arndt J. and J.L. Simon (1983) "Advertising and economies of scale: critical comments on the evidence" The Journal of Industrial Economics, 32: 229-242. 2.Cannon, H.M., J.D. Leckenby, and A. Abernethy. (2002). "Beyond Effective Frequency: Evaluating Media Schedules Using Frequency Value Planning." Journal of Advertising Research 42(6): 33--47. 3.Choo, E and C. R. Clark (2006) "The Effectiveness of Anti-Smoking Campaigns over the Life-Cycle and the Role of Information", mimeo, University of Toronto. 4.Dixit, A. (1979) "A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers.", Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 20-32. 5.Dixit A. And V. Norman (1978) "Advertising and Welfare." Bell Journal of Economics, 9: 1-17. 6.Dube, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., &Manchanda, P. (2005). "An empirical model of advertising dynamics." Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3: 107--144. 7.Farrelly, M. C. K. C. Davis, M. L. Haviland, P. Messeri, and C. G. Healton (2005) "Evidence of a Dose---Response Relationship Between "truth" Antismoking Ads and Youth Smoking Prevalence" American Journal of Public Health, 95: 425-431. 8.Feinberg, F. M. (2001). "On continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response.", Management Science, 47: 1476--1487. 9.Galbraith J.K. (1958) The Affluent Society, Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston, MA. 10.Grossman G. and C. Shapiro (1984) "Informative Advertisement with Differentiated Products." Review of Economic Studies, 51: 63-82. 11.Heyes A. and J. Maxwell (2004) "Private versus Public Regulation: WTO vs NGO's in International Environmental Protection" Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48: 978--996. 12.Heijnen P. and L. Schoonbeek (2008) "Environmental Groups in Monopolistic Markets", Environmental and Resource Economics, 39: 379-396. 13.Kennedy P., B. Laplante and J. Maxwell (1994) " Pollution Policy: the Role of Publicly Provided Information," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26: 31-43. 14.Kihlstrom R. and M. Riordan (1984) "Advertising as a Signal." Journal of Political Economy, 94: 796-821. 15.Kotowitz Y. and F. Mathewson (1979a) "Informative Advertisement and Welfare." American Economic Review, 69: 875-93. 16.Kotowitz Y. and F. Mathewson (1979b) "Advertising, Consumer Information and Product Quality." The Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 566-88. 17.Liston-Heyes C. (2001) "Setting the Stakes in Environmental Contests." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41: 1--12. 18.Martin S. (2002) Advanced Industrial Economics, Second Edition, Blackwell Publishers, MA. 19.Nelson P. (1974) "Advertising as information" Journal of Political Economy, 81: 729-54. 20.Nerlove M. and K.J. Arrow (1962) "Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions" Economica, 29:129-142. 21.Pierce J P, P Macaskill and D Hill () "Long-term effectiveness of mass media led antismoking campaigns in Australia" American Journal of Public Health, 80: 565-569. 22.Petrakis , E. Sartzetakis and A. Xepapadeas (2005) "Environmental Information Provision as a Public Policy Instrument" Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 4: Article 14. 23.Seldona B. J., R. T. Jewellb and D. M. O'Briena (2000) "Media substitution and economies of scale in advertising" International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18: 1153--1180. 24.Singh, N., and X. Vives (1984) "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly." Rand Journal of Economics, 15: 546-554. 25.Stigler G. (1961) "The economics of Information." reprinted in G. Stigler, The Organization of Industry, R.D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, Ill., pages: 171-90. 26.Tietenberg, T., & Wheeler, D. (2001). Empowering the community: Information strategies for pollution control. In . Folmer, H. L. Gabel, S. Gerking, & A. Rose (Eds.), Frontiers of environmental economics (pp. 85-120). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. 27.Tirole J. (1989) The Theory of Industrial Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/12083 |