The Role of Catering Incentives in ESG Disclosure

Lee, King Fuei (2023): The Role of Catering Incentives in ESG Disclosure. Forthcoming in: International Journal of Disclosure and Governance

Abstract

This paper introduces a catering hypothesis of ESG disclosure, where managers adjust their disclosure policies based on investor valuation of high-disclosure companies. The study examines 2,207 US-listed firms from 2005-2022, and finds a significant positive relationship between the ESG disclosure premium and firm ESG reporting. Managers respond to prevailing investor demand for ESG data by disclosing more when investors place a stock price premium on companies with high disclosure levels and disclosing less when investors prefer companies with low disclosure levels. This research enriches sustainability accounting literature by exploring the impact of managerial decision-making and investor demand on ESG disclosure, providing insights for stakeholders and policy development. It also expands understanding of the connection between corporate policy, sustainability, and catering considerations, benefiting stakeholders, directors, and investors interested in improving ESG practices and capital allocation for sustainable development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: ESG disclosure, ESG reporting, sustainability reporting, catering incentives, catering effects, disclosure premium
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

1. Adam, T. and Goyal, V., 2008. The Investment Opportunity Set and its Proxy Variables. Journal of Financial Research 31(1), pp.41-63.

2. Adhikari, B. and Agrawal, A., 2018. Peer Influence on Payout Policies. Journal of Corporate Finance 48, pp. 615-637.

3. Alazzani, A., Wan-Hussin, W., Jones, M. and Al-hadi, A., 2021. ESG Reporting and Analysts’ Recommendations in GCC: The Moderation Role of Royal Family Directors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14(2):72.

4. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y. and Zhang, C., 2019. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Management Science 65(10), pp. 4451–4469.

5. Allman, E. and Won, J., 2021. The Effect of ESG Disclosure on Corporate Investment Efficiency. In Proceedings of Paris December 2021 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-ESSEC.

6. Anouar, K., 2012. The Impact of the Catering Theory and Financial Firms' Characteristics on Dividend Decisions: The Case of the French Market. HAL Working Papers halshs-00765931.

7. Arayssi, M., Jizi, M. and Tabaja, H., 2020. The Impact of Board Composition on the Level of ESG Disclosures in GCC Countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 11(1), pp. 137-161.

8. Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M. and Joyo, A., 2021. The Impact of Audit Committee Attributes on the Quality and Quantity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosures. Corporate Governance 21(3), pp. 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243

9. Atif, M. and Ali, S., 2021. Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure and Default Risk. Business Strategy and the Environment 30(8), pp.3937-3959.

10. Baker, M. and Wurgler, J., 2002. Market Timing and Capital Structure. Journal of Finance 57(1), pp. 1-32.

11. Baker, M. and Wurgler, J., 2004. A Catering Theory Of Dividends. The Journal of Finance 59(3), pp. 1125-1165.

12. Baker, M., And J. Wurgler, 2006, Investor Sentiment And The Cross-Section Of Stock Returns, Journal Of Finance, 61, 1645-1680

13. Baker, M., Egan, M. and Sarkar, S., 2022. How Do Investors Value ESG?. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 30708.

14. Baker, M., Greenwood, R. And Wurgler, J., 2009. Catering Through Nominal Share Prices. Journal Of Finance, 64(6), pp.2559-2590.

15. Bansal, R., Wu, D. and Yaron, A., 2022. Socially Responsible Investing in Good and Bad Times. Review of Financial Studies 35(4), pp. 2067-2099.

16. Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J., 2010. Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility. Economica 77(305), pp.1-19.

17. Bertoni, F. Meoli, M. and Vismara, S., 2014. Board Independence, Ownership Structure and the Valuation of IPOs in Continental Europe. Corporate governance 22 (2), pp.116-131.

18. Blomqvist, A. and Stradi, F., 2022. Responsible Investments: An Analysis of Preference - The Influence of Local Political Views on the Return on ESG Portfolios. European Journal of Finance, pp.1-30.

19. Brennan, N. and Solomon, J., 2008. Corporate Governance, Accountability and Mechanisms of Accountability: An Overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21, pp. 885-906.

20. Breuer, W., Trauzettel, T., Müller, T. and Salzmann, A., 2024. An International Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Time Preferences, and Cost of Equity, International Business Review 33(1), 102194,

21. Brown, G. and Cliff, M., 2004. Investor Sentiment and the Near-Term Stock Market. Journal of Empirical Finance 11(1), pp.1-27.

22. Brunnermeier, K. and Nagel, S., 2004. Hedge Funds and the Technology Bubble. The Journal of Finance 59(5), pp.2013-2040.

23. Bushee, B., 1998. The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior. Accounting Review, pp.305-333.

24. Chen, L. and Zhao, X., 2006. On the Relation Between the Market-to-Book Ratio, Growth Opportunity, and Leverage Ratio. Finance Research Letters 3(4), pp. 253-266,

25. Cho, E., 2023. Time-varying Preferences for ESG Investments: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies 31(2), pp. 121-138.

26. Cowen, S., Ferreri, L.B. and Parker, L.D., 1987. The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Typology and Frequency-Based Analysis. Accounting, Organisations and Society 12(2), pp. 111-122.

27. D’Hondt, C., Merli, M. and Roger, T., 2022. What Drives Retail Portfolio Exposure to ESG Factors?. Finance Research Letters 46(B), 102470.

28. Deegan, C. and Samkin, G., 2009. New Zealand Financial Accounting, McGraw-Hill, Sydney, Australia.

29. Deegan, C., 2006. Legitimacy Theory, in Z. Hoque {ed.), Methodological Issues in Accounting Research: Theories and Methods, Spiramus, London, U.K., pp. 161-181.

30. Di Maggio, P., and Powell, W., 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48, pp. 147-160.

31. Donnelly, R. and Mulcahy, M., 2008. Board Structure, Ownership, and Voluntary Disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16(5), pp.416-429.

32. Donnelly, R. and Mulcahy, M., 2008. Board Structure, Ownership, and Voluntary Disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16, pp. 416–429.

33. Döttling, R. and Kim, S., 2021. ESG Investments and Investors' Preferences. In CESifo Forum (Vol. 22, No. 03, pp. 12-16). München: ifo Institut-Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München.

34. Döttling, R. and Kim, S., 2022. Sustainability Preferences Under Stress: Evidence from COVID-19. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, pp.1-39.

35. Eng, L., Fikru, M. and Vichitsarawong, T., 2022. Comparing the Informativeness of Sustainability Disclosures versus ESG Disclosure Ratings. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 13(2), pp.494-518.

36. Engle, R., Giglio,S., Kelly, B., Lee, H. and Stroebel, J., 2020. Hedging Climate Change News. Review of Financial Studies 33(3), pp. 1184–1216.

37. Fisher, K. and Statman, M., 2000. Investor Sentiment and Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal 56(2), pp.16-23.

38. Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc.

39. Frias-Aceituno, J., Rodriguez-Ariza, L. and Garcia-Sanchez, I., 2013. The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 20, pp. 219–233.

40. Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K. and Verbeeten, F.,2010. Determinants of Voluntary CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5(2), pp. 233-262.

41. Gao, H., Wang, H., and Wen, H., 2023. Does Analyst Coverage Affect Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from China. Evidence from China (April 21, 2023).

42. Garcia S. and Whittaker, T., 2019. ESG Reporting and Financial Performance: the Case of Infrastructure. EDHEC Infrastructure.

43. Giannarakis, G., 2014. Corporate Governance and Financial Characteristic Effects on the Extent of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Social Responsibility Journal 10(4), pp. 569 - 590.

44. Giglio, S., Kelly, B. and Stroebel, J., 2020. Climate Finance. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 28226.

45. Gollier, C. and Pouget, S., 2014. The "Washing Machine": Investment Strategies and Corporate Behavior with Socially Responsible Investors.

46. Grennan, J., 2019. Dividend Payments as a Response to Peer Influence. Journal of Financial Economics 131, pp. 549-570.

47. Guthrie, J., Petty, R. and Ricceri, Ff, 2006. The Voluntary Reporting of Intellectual Capital: Comparing Evidence from Hong Kong and Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital 7(2), pp 254-271.

48. Haniffa, R. and Cooke, T., 2005. The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24(5), pp. 391-430.

49. He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y. and Wu, J., 2022. CSR and Idiosyncratic Risk: Evidence from ESG Information Disclosure. Finance Research Letters 49, 102936.

50. Herbohn, K., Gao, R. and Clarkson, P., 2019. Evidence on Whether Banks Consider Carbon Risk in Their Lending Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 158, pp 155–75.

51. Ho, L. and Taylor, M., 2007. An Empirical Analysis of Triple Bottom-line Reporting and its Determinates: Evidence From the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 18(2), pp. 123-150.

52. Ingley, C. and Van Der Walt, N., 2004. Corporate Governance, Institutional Investors and Conflicts of Interest. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12, pp. 534–551.

53. Ivković, Z. and Jegadeesh, N., 2004. The Timing and Value of Forecast and Recommendation Revisions. Journal of Financial Economics 73, pp. 433–63

54. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of The Firm Manajerial Behaviour, Ageny Cost and Ownership structure. Jounrla of Financial Economics 3, pp. 305–360.

55. Kallapur, S, and Trombley, M., 1999. The Association Between Investment Opportunity Set Proxies and Realized Growth. Journal Of Business Finance and Accounting 26, 505-519

56. Leary, M. and Roberts, M., 2014, Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?. Journal of Finance 69, pp. 139-178.

57. Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. and Koh, L., 2018. The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure on Firm Value: The Role of CEO Power. The British Accounting Review 50(1), pp.60-75.

58. Lins, K., Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A., 2017. ) Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility During the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance 72(4), pp. 1785–1824.

59. Liu, D., Gu, K. and Hu, W., 2023. ESG Performance and Stock Idiosyncratic Volatility. Finance Research Letters 58(B), 104393.

60. Lopez-de-Silanes, F., McCahery, J. and Pudschedl, P., 2022. Institutional Investors and ESG Preferences. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4049313.

61. Manski, C., 1993. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. Review of Economic Studies 60, pp. 531-542.

62. McBrayer, G., 2018. Does Persistence Explain ESG Disclosure Decisions?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25(6), pp. 1074-1086.

63. Myers, S. and Majluf, N., 1984. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics 13(2), 187–221.

64. Myers, S., 1977. Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5, pp. 146-175

65. Narayanan, M., 1985. Managerial Incentives for Short-Term Results. Journal of Finance 40, pp. 1469-1484.

66. Newton, N., 2019. When Analysts Speak, Do Auditors Listen?. Auditing 38 pp. 221-45

67. Pedersen, L., Fitzgibbons, S. and Pomorski, L., 2021. Responsible Investing: The ESG-efficient Frontier. Journal of Financial Economics 142(2), pp. 572-597.

68. Pitrakkos, P. and Maroun, W., 2019. Evaluating the Quality of Carbon Disclosures. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal 11(3), pp. 553-589.

69. Porter, M., 1992. Capital Choices: The Causes and Cures of Business Myopia. Unpublished paper presented at US Government’s Council on Competitiveness, Washington DC.

70. Pyles, M., 2020. Examining Portfolios Created by Bloomberg ESG Scores: Is Disclosure an Alpha Factor?. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing 1(2), pp.39-52.

71. Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A. and Tharyan, R., 2016. Environmental and Social Disclosures: Link with Corporate Financial Performance. The British Accounting Review 48(1), pp. 102-116.

72. Rahman, R. and Alsayegh, M., 2021. Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting Among Asian Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14(4), pp. 1-13.

73. Raimo, N., Caragnano, A., Zito, M., Vitolla, F. and Mariani, M., 2021. Extending the Benefits of ESG Disclosure: The Effect on the Cost of Debt Financing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 28(4), pp.1412-1421.

74. Rajgopal, S., Shivakumar, L., and Simpson, A.V., 2007. A Catering Theory of Earnings Management. LSN: Law & Finance: Empirical (Topic).

75. Rappaport, A., 2005. The Economics of Short-Term Performance Obsession. Financial Analysts Journal 61, pp. 65-79.

76. Reber, B., Gold, A. and Gold, S., 2022. ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Business Ethics 179(3), pp. 867-886.

77. Reverte, C., 2009. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 88(2), pp. 351-366.

78. Riedl, A. and Smeets, P., 2017. Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?. Journal of Finance 72(6), pp.2505-2550.

79. Roychowdhury, S., 2006. Earnings Management Through Real Activities Manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42(3), pp. 335-370.

80. Serafeim, G., and Yoon, A., 2022. Stock Price Reactions to ESG News: The Role of ESG Ratings and Disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies, pp. 1-31.

81. Shanaev, S. and Ghimire, B., 2022. When ESG Meets AAA: The Effect of ESG Rating Changes on Stock Returns. Finance Research Letters 46, 102302.

82. Sharma, A., Branch, B., Chgawla, C. and Qiu, L., 2013. Explaining Market-to-Book; The Relative Impact of Firm Performance, Growth, and Risk. Quest of Business, pp.277-293.

83. Shleifer, A., 2000. Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford University Press.

84. Smales, L., 2017. The Importance of Fear: Investor Sentiment and Stock Market Returns. Applied Economics 49(34), pp.3395-3421.

85. Starks, L., Venkat, P. and Zhu, Q., 2017. Corporate ESG Profiles and Investor Horizons. Available at SSRN 3049943.

86. Stein, J. C., 1989. Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, pp. 655-669.

87. Sudarsanam, P. and Qian, B., 2007. Catering Theory of Corporate Spinoffs: Empirical Evidence from Europe. American Finance Association Meetings (AFA).

88. Sueppel, R., 2021. A Market-to-Book Formula for Equity Strategies. Macrosynergy. Available at: https://research.macrosynergy.com/a-market-to-book-formula-for-equity-strategies/

89. Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P. and Collin, S.O., 2009. What Explains the Extent and Content of Social and Environmental Disclosures on Corporate Websites: A Study of Social and Environmental Reporting in Swedish Listed Corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16(6), pp. 352-364.

90. van Ees, H., Postma, T. and Sterken, E., 2003. Board Characteristics and Corporate Performance in the Netherlands. Eastern Economic Journal 29(1), pp. 41-58.

91. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N. and Rubino, M., 2019. Board Characteristics and Integrated Reporting Quality: An Agency Theory Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27, pp. 1152–1163.

92. Wallace, R., Naser, K. and Mora, A., 1994. The Relationship Between the Comprehensiveness of Corporate Annual Reports and Firm Characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research 25(97), pp. 41-53.

93. Weber, O., 2012. Environmental Credit Risk Management in Banks and Financial Service Institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment 21, pp. 248–63.

94. Welch, I., 2004. Capital Structure and Stock Returns. Journal of Political Economy 112(1), pp.106-131.

95. Wong, J. and Zhang, Q., 2022. Stock Market Reactions to Adverse ESG Disclosure Via Media Channels. The British Accounting Review 54(1), 101045.

96. Yoo, S. and Managi, S., 2022. Disclosure or Action: Evaluating ESG Behavior Towards Financial Performance. Finance Research Letters 44, p.102-108.

97. Yu, E. and Van Luu, B., 2021. International Variations in ESG disclosure - Do Cross-listed Companies Care More?. International Review of Financial Analysis 75, p.101731.

98. Zhang, C. and Wu, X., 2003. Analyst Coverage and Corporate ESG Performance. Sustainability 15(17), 12763.