Bukvić, Rajko (2011): Трансформационный кризис и экономическое развитие Сербии. Published in: Проблемы теории и практики управления No. 7 (2011): pp. 103-114.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_120969.pdf Download (364kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Русский: Трансформационный кризис представляется результатом активного применения неоклассической модели трансформации, и для выхода из него требуется серьезный пересмотр теоретических основ развития. Реализация реформ, провозглашенных в Вашингтонском консенсусе (конец 1980-х годов) и развитых на его основе, не принесла ожидаемых результатов. Новая стратегия развития Сербии, как и других стран с переходной экономикой, должна включать идеи альтернативной экономической теории, которая восходит к концепции «Другого канона». English. The transformation crisis seems to be the result of the active application of the neoclassical model of transformation, and to get out of it, a serious revision of the theoretical foundations of development is required. The implementation of the reforms proclaimed in the Washington Consensus (late 1980s) and developed on its basis did not bring the expected results. The new development strategy for Serbia, like other countries with economies in transition, should include the ideas of an alternative economic theory, which goes back to the concept of the “Other Canon”.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Трансформационный кризис и экономическое развитие Сербии |
English Title: | Transformational Crisis and the Economic Development of Serbia |
Language: | Russian |
Keywords: | трансформационный кризис, стандартная теория, концепция «Другого канона», Вашингтонский консенсус, План Моргентау, План Маршалла, transformation crisis, standard theory, concept of the “Other Canon”, Washington Consensus, Morgenthau Plan, Marshall Plan |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P20 - General P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P27 - Performance and Prospects P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P30 - General |
Item ID: | 120969 |
Depositing User: | Rajko M. Bukvić |
Date Deposited: | 29 May 2024 19:46 |
Last Modified: | 07 Jun 2024 06:42 |
References: | Kornai, Janos. Transformational Recession: The Main Causes // Journal of Comparative Economics. – 1994. – Vol. 19. – № 1, рр. 39–63. Bukvić, Rajko. Morgentauov plan i Vašingtonski konsenzus: ima li razvojnog izlaza za zemlje u tranziciji, Zbornik Kriza i razvoj. – Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka. 2010, рр. 328–334. Bukvić, Rajko. The Other Canon against Washington Consensus: ReIndustrialization as а Condition for Economic Revival and Development, 8th International Scientific Conference Forces Driving the Revival of the Companies and Есonomy, Proceedings. – Beograd: Megatrend University, 2010, рр. 267–276. Bukvić, Rajko. Foundation, Results and Perspectives of Transition: А Case of Serbia // Економика. – 2010. – Vol. 56. – № 4. – рр. 10–26. Hirschman, Albert. The Rhetoric of Reaction. Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. – Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1991. Williamson, John. What Washington Means bу Policy Reform, in J. Williamson (ed.) Latin American Readjustment: How Much Has Happened, Washington: Institute for International Economics. 1990. (www.iie.com/publications/papers/papercfm?ResearchID=486.) Williamson, John. From Reform Agenda to Damaged Brand Name // Finance & Development. – 2003. – Vol. 40. – № 3, 10–13. Moisés, Naím. Washington Consensus of Washington Confusion? // Foreign Policy. – 2000. – № 118, pp. 87–103. Williamson, John. After the Washington Consensus: Latin American Growth and Sustainable Development, Keynote speech at the Seminar on Latin American Financing and the Role of' Development Banks Organized bу the IDB, BDMG, and ALIDE, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, March 30–31, 2006. Катић, Небоjша. Неолиберални корени светске економске кризе // Нова српска политичка мисао. – 2009. – Vol. 17. – № 3–4, рр. 55–66. Rodrik, Dani. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion. А Review of the World Bank's Economic Growth in the l 990s: Learning from а Decade of Reform // Journal of Economic Literature. – 2006. – Vol. 44. – № 4, рр. 973–987. Reinert, Erik S. Globalna ekonomija. Kako su bogati postali bogati i zašto siromašni postaju siromašniji. – Beograd: Čigoja štampa, 2006. Ковалик, Тадеуш. У истоков современного финансового кризиса // Белорусский экономический журнал. – 2009. – Vol. 13. – № 1(46), pp. 4–12. Serra, Antonio. Кratka rasprava о uzrocima koji mogu izazvati obilje zlata i srebra u kraljevinama u kojima nema rudnika s primjenom na kraljevinu Napulj / S. Štampar (ur.) Ekonomisti XVII i XVIII stoljeća. – Zagreb: Kultura, 1952, рр. 111–188. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/120969 |