Technology Use in US Manufacturing

Gabe, Todd and Hunt, Elinor and Crawley, Andrew (2024): Technology Use in US Manufacturing.

Abstract

This paper examines the technology use of US manufacturing businesses. Results from a 2023 survey of US manufacturers (n=268) show that computer-aided design (CAD), numerically or computer-controlled machines, and programmable controllers / programmable logic controllers have considerably higher adoption rates than Industry 4.0 technologies such as virtual and augmented reality, robots, and AI / machine learning. The most frequently cited barriers to the use of Industry 4.0 technologies are the size and needs (e.g., “products don’t require technology”) of a company more so than concerns about various aspects of technology (e.g., fear of obsoletion). When selecting technologies to use, US manufacturers consider the impacts of the technology on production and the business (e.g., enhance product quality, increase worker productivity) and costs (reduce production costs, costs of purchasing the technology) more so than the skills of workers and recommendations of (or use by) other businesses, industry associations, colleges, or universities. Future research using the survey data will provide a more in-depth analysis of technology use and its broader impacts on businesses and the regions where they are located.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: US Manufacturing, Technology Use
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes

References

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), Industrial Production: Total Index [INDPRO], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO, March 4, 2024.

Dinlersoz, Emin, and Zoltan Wolf. “Automation, labor share, and productivity: Plant-level evidence from US Manufacturing.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology (2023): 1-23. DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2023.2233081

Gale, Frederick, David McGranahan, Ruy Teixeira, and Elizabeth Greenberg. “Rural Competitiveness: Results of the 1996 Rural Manufacturing Survey.” No. 34077. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 1999.

Tornincasa, Stefano, and Francesco Di Monaco. “The future and the evolution of CAD.” In Proceedings of the 14th international research/expert conference: Trends in the development of machinery and associated technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11-18. 2010.

West, Darrell M. “What happens if robots take the jobs? The impact of emerging technologies on employment and public policy.” Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, Washington DC (2015).

West, Darrell M. “How technology is changing manufacturing.” Commentary, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC (2016).

Zolas, Nikolas, Zachary Kroff, Erik Brynjolfsson, Kristina McElheran, David N. Beede, Cathy Buffington, Nathan Goldschlag, Lucia Foster, and Emin Dinlersoz. “Advanced technologies adoption and use by US firms: Evidence from the annual business survey.” No. W28290. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021.