Schmidt, James (2024): In Search of the Fair Share of FAIR Plan Policies Among Northern California Counties.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_122252.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Due to wildfire risk, conventional fire insurance has become difficult to obtain in a several areas of Northern California. As a consequence, many residents have been forced to obtain more expensive policies through the last-resort option, the California FAIR Plan. The lack of conventional insurance is particularly acute in the Central Sierra region. In 2022, the latest year for which county data is available, FAIR Plan policies in several Central Sierras counties comprised nearly 40% of the homeowner insurance market. The number of FAIR Plan policies compared to at-risk homes in the Central Sierras is nearly 1.5 times higher than in the Northern Sierras and 4.8 times higher than in the San Francisco Bay Area. This disparity exists despite the fact that losses as a percentage of at-risk homes have been much lower in the Central Sierras. In June, 2024, the California Department of Insurance (CDI) proposed regulations to limit FAIR Plan policies to a maximum of 15% of homeowner policies by county. The intent was to achieve a more balanced distribution of FAIR Plan policies. The following analysis examines what would happen if the number of FAIR Plan policies in effect in Northern California in 2022 were distributed among counties on the basis of each county’s total risk. What would be the resulting percentage of FAIR Plan policies in each county? And what would be the impact on the total number of FAIR Plan policies by region in Northern California? Four different methods for calculating risk by county are analyzed. In each case, the CDI estimates for the number of high-risk dwelling units by county are used as the starting point. On method simply uses the CDI numbers directly as the risk metric. In other risk assessments, factors such as the proportion of structures by Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CAL FIRE, 2024), the proportion of structures in high-wind areas, and past loss rates by zone are used to weight the CDI numbers. If based on the results of this analysis, the number of FAIR Plan policies in the Central and Southern Sierras would be reduced by at least 40% compared to 2022 levels and over 70% if risk calculations reflected the relatively small extent of high-wind areas in those regions. In the Central Sierras, Tuolumne and Mariposa counties would be slightly above the cap at 19% under some risk scenarios but would drop as low as 8% in others.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | In Search of the Fair Share of FAIR Plan Policies Among Northern California Counties |
English Title: | In Search of the Fair Share of FAIR Plan Policies Among Northern California Counties |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | FAIR Plan, wildfire, Northern California, fire insurance, Sierras, Bay Area, fire hazard zones, wind, California Department of Insurance, catastrophe models, regulations, risk |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G22 - Insurance ; Insurance Companies ; Actuarial Studies H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H89 - Other Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming |
Item ID: | 122252 |
Depositing User: | James Schmidt |
Date Deposited: | 19 Oct 2024 08:49 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2024 08:49 |
References: | Abatzoglou JT., Smith CM., Swain DL., Ptak T., Kolden CA. (2020) Population exposure to pre-emptive de-energization aimed at averting wildfires in Northern California. Environmental Research Letters. 2020 Aug 26;15(9):094046. DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aba135. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aba135/meta Abatzoglou, JT., Kolden, CA., Williams, AP., Sadegh, M., Balch, JK., & Hall, A. (2023). Downslope wind-driven fires in the western United States. Earth's Future, 11, e2022EF003471. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003471 CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Maps (2024) https://gis.data.cnra.ca.gov/datasets/CALFIRE-Forestry::fire-hazard-severity-zones-in-sra-effective-april-1-2024-with-lra-recommended-2007-2011/explore CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Methods (2024) https://34c031f8-c9fd-4018-8c5a-4159cdff6b0d-cdn-endpoint.azureedge.net/-/media/osfm-website/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones/fire-hazard-severity-zones-map/short_fhsz_methods_042324.pdf?rev=8fc7f1245bbb4bab9e3afe42c25673a8&hash=6E5E3014AE4428F60FDB72CA86E0ABAB DINS, CAL FIRE Damage Inspection Database (2022). https://data.ca.gov/dataset/cal-fire-damage-inspection-dins-data Goss, M., Swain, DL, Abatzoglou, JT., Sarhadi, A., Kolden, CA., Williams, AP., Diffenbaugh, NS. (2020) Climate change is increasing the likelihood of extreme autumn wildfire conditions across California. Environmental Research Letters, 15 094016 DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab83a7. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab83a7 Keeley, JE., and Syphard, AD. (2019). Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated fires. Fire Ecology, 15(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-019-0041-0. Microsoft Building Footprints (2018). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/maps/building-footprints Parker, DR. (1992) The Oakland-Berkeley Hills Fire: An Overview. http://www.sfmuseum.org/oakfire/overview.html Schmidt, J. (2024). County wildfire risk ratings in Northern California: FAIR Plan insurance policies and simulation models vs. Red Flag warnings and Diablo winds. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120195/ |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122252 |