Two Roads Diverged: Two Alternate Strategies for Protecting Captive Freight Shippers in the “Americas” Model of Freight Rail Restructuring

Pittman, Russell (2024): Two Roads Diverged: Two Alternate Strategies for Protecting Captive Freight Shippers in the “Americas” Model of Freight Rail Restructuring.

Abstract

How to protect “captive shippers” from monopolistic abuses by a railway? In an “open access” system, it’s straightforward: provide infrastructure access to a competing train operating company. In a system without open access – as in, for example, the United States, Canada, Mexico, and Brazil – it’s not so straightforward. For freight shippers lacking economic intramodal or intramodal shipping alternatives, regulators and policymakers have focused on regulatory alternatives in two broad categories: 1) direct regulation of rates, and 2) imposed, regulated competition from a second railway (for example, interswitching or trackage rights). We argue that, despite disadvantages familiar to every Economics 101 student, direct regulation of rates has proven to be the superior alternative, and we discuss alternative mechanisms currently under debate.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: freight railways, regulation, captive shippers, Canada, Mexico
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L98 - Government Policy

References

Gómez-Ibáñez, José, and Ginés de Rus, eds., Competition in the Railway Industry: An International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2006

Pittman, Russell, “Options for Restructuring the State-Owned Monopoly Railway,” Research in Transportation Economics 20 (2007), 179-198.

Pittman, Russell, “The Underappreciated Connection between Rail Restructuring Strategies and Financing,” Review of Network Economics 16 (2017), 161-169

Pittman, Russell, “On the Economics of Restructuring World Railways, with a Focus on Russia,” Man and the Economy 7 (2020).

Nash, Chris, Yves Crozet, Heike Link, Jan-Eric Nilsson, and Andrew Smith, “Track access charges: reconciling conflicting objectives,” Brussels: Centre on Regulation in Europe, 9 May 2018, https://cerre.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/180509_CERRE_TrackAccessCharges_OverallReport_final-1.pdf.

E.CA Economics, “Vertical integration, competition and efficiency in the rail industry: Economic trade-offs,” June 2024, https://www.e-ca.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/eca-report-on-vertical-integration-in-rail-transport-june-2024-final.pdf.

Besanko, David, and Shana Cui, “Railway restructuring and organizational choice: Network quality and welfare impacts,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 50 (2016), 164-206

Besanko, David, “Restructuring Rail Systems: Implications for Network Quality and Welfare,” in Jeffrey Macher and John Mayo, eds., U.S. Freight Rail Economics and Policy: Are We on the Right Track?”, London: Routledge, 2019.

Lawrence, Martha, and Gerald Ollivier, “Private Capital for Railway Development,” China Transport Topics No. 10, August 2014, https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/134031468263105814/pdf/901170NWP0CTT10385300B00PUBLIC000EN.pdf.

Sampaioa , Patricia, Joisa Dutrab Edson Gonçalvesc, Mariam Daychoum, and Bruno Palermoe, “Regulatory reform in the Brazilian railway sector – a preliminary assessment,” Network Industries Quarterly 17 (2015), 14-16

Castelar, Armando, and Luísa Ozevedo, “Rail Regulation in Brazil,” Network Industries Quarterly 18 (2016), 12-15

Gauthier, Gregoire, “Rail Sector and Regulation in Brazil,” World Bank, July 2, 2019, https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/474510/4._Gregoire_Gauthier_Brazilan_Railways.pdf

Kleber, Marcos, Ribeiro Felix, “Railway Authorizations Law: Brazil’s Most Successful Rail Policy in 100 Years,” unpublished paper, Brasilia, 2024, https://ousebem.com.br/railway-authorizations-law-brazils-most-successful-rail-policy-in-100-years.

Wilson, Wesley, and Frank Wolak, “Freight Rail Costing and Regulation: The Uniform Rail Costing System,” Review of Industrial Organization 49 (2016), 229-261.

“STB Economists’ Round Table on the Stand Alone Cost Test and Its Future,” Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics and Policy 90 (2023), 89-161

Faulhaber, G.R., “Cross-subsidization: Pricing in public enterprises,” American Economic Review 65 (1975), 966-977.

Pittman, Russell, “Against the Stand-Alone-Cost Test in U.S. Freight Rail Regulation,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 38 (2010), 313-326

Transportation Research Board, Modernizing Freight Rail Regulation, Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2015.

Mayo, John, and Robert Willig, “Economic Foundations for 21st Century Freight Rail Regulation,” in Macher and Mayo, U.S. Freight Rail Economics and Policy, op cit.

Wilson, Wesley, and Frank Wolak, “Price Benchmark Regulation of Multiproduct Firms: An Application to the Rail Industry,” Journal of Law and Economics 65 (2022), S155-S190.

STB, Rate Reform Task Force – Report to the Surface Transportation Board, April 25, 2019.

Nolan, James, Chi Su, Logan Pizzey, and Steven Peterson, “Parallel or Converging? A Comparative Analysis of the Grain and Rail Transportation Systems in Canada and the United States,” report to the Agricultural Marketing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, October 2020.

Union Pacific Railroad v. STB, No. 23-1325, 8th Circuit 2024.

Stevens, Bill, “Amtrak on-time performance woes mirror host railroad freight service, shippers say,” Trains, August 7, 2024, https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/amtrak-on-time-performance-woes-mirror-host-railroad-freight-service-shippers-say/.

Pittman, Russell, “The Economics of Railroad ‘Captive Shipper’ Legislation,” Administrative Law Review 62 (2010), 919-936

U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, “Comment” on Reciprocal Switching for STB Docket No. EP-711 (Sub-No. 1), https://www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/1479511/dl?inline.

Farber, Henry, “An Analysis of Final Offer Arbitration,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (1980), 683-705

Prentice, Barry, and Graham Parsons, “Freedom in Western Grain Movement,” report prepared for the Railway Association of Canada, January 13, 2015, Appendix C of https://www.railcan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Canada-Transportation-Act-Review-1.pdf.

Canadian Transportation Agency, “The Maximum Revenue Entitlement: A Guide,” December 22, 2020, https://otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/publication/maximum-revenue-entitlement-a-guide.

Kahn, Alfred, The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions, New York: Wiley, 1970; reissued Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.

Baumol, William, John Panzar, and Robert Willig, Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure, New York: Harcourt, 1982.

Canadian Competition Bureau, Submission to the Canadian Transportation Act Review Panel, February 24, 2015, https://competition-bureau.canada.ca/how-we-foster-competition/promotion-and-advocacy/regulatory-adviceinterventions-competition-bureau/submission-canada-transportation-act-review-panel-rail-air-and-marine-transportation

Bennett, Mary-Jane, “Should Canada Ditch the Switch? Interswitching and Canadian Rail Policy,” Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics & Policy 89 (2022), 37-76

Stuhldreier, Lucia, “The Regulation of Interswitching in Canada: A Different Perspective on the Case for Ditching the Switch,” Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics & Policy 90 (2023), 57-75.

Grimm, Curtis, and Robert Harris, “Competition Access Policies in the Rail Freight Industry, with Comparisons to Telecommunications,” in David Gabel and David Weiman, eds., Opening Networks to Competition: The Regulation and Pricing of Access, New York: Springer, 1998.

Perkins, Steven, “Regulation, competition and performance of Mexico’s freight railways,” Network Industries Quarterly 18 (2016), 21-26

Rivera-Trujillo, César, “Establishing the first economic regulation of the Mexican rail concessions,” Research in Transportation Economics 100 (2023).

Gutiérrez Engelmann, Octavio, and Andrea Lapatie, “Railroad Services’ competition legal framework,” COFECE slide presentation, July 2019.

Campos, Javier, “Lessons from railway reforms in Brazil and Mexico,” Transport Policy 8 (2001), 85-95.