Remoundou, Kyriaki and Kountouris, Yiannis and Koundouri, Phoebe (2010): Does institutional context affect preference formation? Evidence from a stated preference valuation study. Published in:
PDF
MPRA_paper_122495.pdf Download (744kB) |
Abstract
In this paper we employ a choice experiment to test the effect of the institution responsible for the management of an environmental good, on stated preferences. Specifically, we examine whether respondents’ valuation of a forest restoration program in Greece is different under (a) European Commission and (b) National State management. Following a split sample approach and accounting for preference heterogeneity, we find that the institutional context is neutral to preference formation for the environmental good in question although there are significant differences in the trust levels reported for the two institutions considered.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does institutional context affect preference formation? Evidence from a stated preference valuation study |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | choice experiment, preference formation, institutional context, forest fires |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General |
Item ID: | 122495 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Phoebe Koundouri |
Date Deposited: | 09 Nov 2024 09:01 |
Last Modified: | 09 Nov 2024 09:01 |
References: | Alpizar Francisco, Fredrik Carlsson and Olof Johansson-Stenman. 2008. ‘‘Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? Evidence from a natural field experiment.’’ Experimental Economics 11:299-314. Bergstrom John C., Kevin J. Boyle and Mitsuyasu Yabe. 2004. ‘‘Trading Taxes vs. Paying Taxes to Value and Finance Public Environmental Goods.’’ Environmental and Resource Economics 28: 533–549. Bowles Samuel. 1998. ‘‘Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions.’’ Journal of Economic Literature 36(1):75-111. Campbell Danny, George W. Hutchinson and Riccardo Scarpa. 2009. ‘‘Using choice experiments to explore the spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements.’’ Environment and Planning A 41(1):97-111. Campbell Danny, Scarpa Riccardo and George W. Hutchinson. 2008. ‘‘Assessing the spatial dependence of welfare estimates obtained from discrete choice experiments.’’ Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 1(2):117-126. Carlsson Fredrik and Peter Martinsson. 2003a. ‘‘Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics.’’ Health Economics 12: 281–294. Carlsson Fredrik, Peter Frykblom and Carolina Liljenstolpe. 2003b. "Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments." Ecological Economics 47: 95-103. Carlsson Fredrik, Peter Frykblom and Carl Johan Lagerkvist. 2005. ‘‘Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments.’’ Economics Letters 89: 147–152. Cummings Ronald D. and Laura Osborne Taylor. 1998. ‘‘Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation Surveys?’’ Land Economics 74(2): 203-215. Diamond Peter A. and Jerry A. Hausman. 1994. ‘‘Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?’’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4): 45-64. European Parliament 2008. ‘‘Forest fires: causes and contributing factors in Europe.’’ Available at: http://www.europarl.gr/ressource/static/files/projets_pdf/forest_fires.pdf (Accessed January 2010). Forest Service of Parnitha, available at: http://www.parnitha-np.gr/ (Accessed January 2010). Fror Oliver. 2008. ‘‘Bounded rationality in contingent valuation: Empirical evidence using cognitive psychology.’’ Ecological Economics 68: 570–581. Johnston Robert, Stephen K. Swallow and Thomas Weaver. 1999. ‘‘Estimating Willingness to Pay and Resource Tradeoffs with Different Payment Mechanisms: An Evaluation of a Funding Guarantee for Watershed Management.’’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38: 97-120. Hanley Nick, Adamowicz Wiktor and Robert E.Wright. 2005. ‘‘Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test.’’ Resource and Energy Economics 27 (3): 227-234. Hensher David A. and William H. Greene. 2003. ‘‘The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice.’’ Transportation 30: 133–176. Hensher David A., John M. Rose and William H. Greene. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press. Horowitz John K. and Kenneth E. McConnel. 2002. "A Review of WTA/WTP Studies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 426-447. Kataria Mitesh. 2009. ‘‘Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers.’’ Energy Economics 31: 69–76. Kataria Mitesh, Berit Hasler, Nissen, C.J., Christensen, T., Martinsen, L., Ladenburg, J., Levin, G., Dubgaard, A.,Ian J. Bateman and Hime, S. 2009. ‘‘Scenario Realism and Welfare Estimates in Choice Experiments- Evidence from a study on implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in Denmark.’’ Paper presented in the 17th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Amsterdam Kaval Pamela, John B. Loomis and Andly Seidl. 2007. ‘‘Willingness-to-pay for prescribed fire in the Colorado (USA) wildland urban interface.’’ Forest Policy and Economics 9: 928–937. Krinsky Itzahak and Leslie A. Robb.1986. ‘‘On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities.’’ Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4):715–719. Kontoleon Andreas, Mitsuyasu Yabe and Laura Darby. 2005. ‘‘Alternative Payment Vehicles in Contingent Valuation: The Case of Genetically Modified Foods.’’ Presented in the EAERE Conference 2005, available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1827/ (Accessed January 2010) List John A., Robert P. Berrens, Alok K. Bohara and Joe Kerkvliet. 2004. ‘‘Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences.’’ The American Economic Review 94(3):741-752. Loomis John B. and Armando Gonzalez-Caban. 1998. ‘‘A willingness-to-pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire.’’ Ecological Economics 25 : 315–322. Loomis John B. 2004. ‘‘Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values?’’ Journal of Forest Economics 10:149–157. Mitchell Robert Cameron and Richard T. Carson.1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington: john Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future. Morrison Mark D., Russell K. Blamey and Jeffrey W. Bennett. 2000. ‘‘Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies.’’ Environmental and Resource Economics 16: 407–422. Nunes Paulo A.L.D. and Chiara M. Travisi. 2009. ‘‘Comparing Tax and Tax Reallocation Payments in Financing Rail Noise Abatement Programmes: Results from a Stated Choice Valuation Study in Italy.’’ Environmental and Resource Economics 43 (4):503-517. Poe Gregory L., Kelly L. Giraud and John B. Loomis. 2005. ‘‘Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.’’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–365. Randall Alan. 1986. Human Preferences, Economics, and the Preservation of Species. In Norton, B.G. (ed.). The Preservation of Species. Princeton University Press: Princeton. Revelt David and Kenneth Train. 1998. ‘‘Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level.’’ Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 647–657. Riera Pere and Joan Mogas. 2004. ‘‘Evaluation of a risk reduction in forest fires in a Mediterranean region.’’ Forest Policy and Economics 6:521– 528. Rera Pere, Josef Penuelas, Veronica Farreras and Marc Estiarte. 2007. ‘‘Valuation of Climate-Change Effects on Mediterranean Shrublands.’’ Ecological Applications 17(1): 91–100. Rolfe John, Jeff Bennett and Jordan Louviere. 2002. ‘‘Stated values and reminders of substitute goods: Testing for framing effects with choice modelling.’’ Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46(1):1-20. Shapansky Bradford, Wiktor L. Adamowicz and Peter C. Boxall. 2008. ‘‘Assessing information provision and respondent involvement effects on preferences.’’ Ecological Economics 65:626–635. Schlapfer, Felix. 2006. ‘‘Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: A meta-analysis.’’ Ecological Economics 57: 415– 429. Swait Joffre and Jordan Louviere. 1993. ‘‘The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models.’’ Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–314. Train Kenneth E. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Tversky Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. ‘‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.’’ Science 211: 453-458. Vant Arild. 2005. ‘‘Rationality, institutions and environmental policy.’’ Ecological Economics 55:203– 217. Vant Arild. 2004. ‘‘Environmental valuation and rationality.’’ Land Economics 80(1): 1-18. Vaux Henry J., Philip Gardner, Mills Thomas J. 1984. Methods for assessing the impact of fire on forest recreation. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-79. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, Berkeley, CA. Whittington Dale 2002. ‘‘Improving the Performance of Contingent Valuation Studies in Developing Countries.’’ Environmental and Resource Economics 22: 323–367. WWF Greece. 2007a. Ecological assessment of the wildfires of June 2007 in the Parnitha. Available at the official website of WWF Greece: http://politics.wwf.gr/images/stories//fireparnisreport2007_14.pdf. (Accessed November 2009, In Greek). WWF Greece. 2007b. Basic principles for the protection and management of the National Park of Parnitha after the wildfires. Available at the official website of WWF Greece: http://politics.wwf.gr/images/stories/political/dasikipolitiki/masterplanparnes.pdf (Accessed November 2009, In Greek). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122495 |