Flores, Lou Norman and Moreno, Frede (2024): Ethical Implications and Perspectives on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence among Graduate Students in Public Administration in Basilan Province, Philippines.
PDF
MPRA_paper_122809.pdf Download (223kB) |
Abstract
This study investigates the ethical implications and perspectives on the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) among graduate students in public administration, focusing on Basilan Province, Philippines. Employing a qualitative case study approach, the research integrates semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and surveys to gather data. Findings reveal significant ethical concerns, including privacy issues, algorithmic bias, and accountability challenges. Students exhibit a range of attitudes toward AI, recognizing its potential benefits while also highlighting associated risks. The study identifies gaps in current public administration curricula concerning AI ethics and provides recommendations for integrating comprehensive AI ethics training into academic programs. By applying Technological Determinism theory, the research examines how AI's evolution influences public administration practices and the preparedness of future professionals. This research contributes to the understanding of AI’s ethical dimensions in governance and offers insights for policymakers and educators to enhance ethical AI utilization in public administration.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Ethical Implications and Perspectives on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence among Graduate Students in Public Administration in Basilan Province, Philippines |
English Title: | Ethical Implications and Perspectives on the Utilization of Artificial Intelligence among Graduate Students in Public Administration in Basilan Province, Philippines |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Artificial Intelligence (AI), Public Administration, Ethical Implications, Technological Determinism, AI Ethics, Graduate Students, Basilan Province, Philippines |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology |
Item ID: | 122809 |
Depositing User: | Moreno Frede |
Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2024 22:49 |
Last Modified: | 01 Dec 2024 22:49 |
References: | American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.59 Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 149-159. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Chalk, P. (2001). Separatism and Southeast Asia: The Islamic Factor in Southern Thailand, Mindanao, and Aceh. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 24(4), 241-269. Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. Princeton: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118256141 Dolan, J. (2018). Preparing public administrators for the future: Education, service learning, and civic engagement. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 702-710. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Fink, A. (2013). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483390885 Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 301-316). Sage Publications. Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292 Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage Publications. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385164 Kvale, S. (2007). Doing Interviews. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963 Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120382. Mikhaylov, S. J., Esteve, M., & Campion, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: Opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2128), 20170357. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986263 Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses, and outcomes. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1604-1616. Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368-383. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2018). Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Common Rule). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., ... & Nerini, F. F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-10. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136. Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1488308 Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122809 |