Ethics in Science: Foundations, Contemporary Challenges, and Future Directions

Teessar, Janari (2024): Ethics in Science: Foundations, Contemporary Challenges, and Future Directions.

Abstract

Ethics serves as the cornerstone of scientific research, ensuring that advancements align with societal values, uphold integrity, and promote equity. This paper provides a comprehensive exploration of ethics in science, beginning with its historical evolution and the establishment of foundational principles such as honesty, accountability, and respect for intellectual property. It examines contemporary ethical challenges, including data privacy, conflicts of interest, and equity in global research collaborations, emphasizing the role of ethics in addressing these dilemmas. Special attention is given to emerging ethical concerns in artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and environmental sustainability. The role of education and training in promoting ethical awareness is highlighted, with case studies showcasing successful programs like the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) and UNESCO’s Bioethics Core Curriculum. Interdisciplinary collaboration is identified as a vital approach to navigating complex ethical issues, fostering innovation, and developing comprehensive frameworks for global challenges. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen the culture of ethical scientific practice, emphasizing the need for transparency, public engagement, and continuous reflection. As science advances into uncharted territories, this paper reaffirms the importance of ethics as a guiding force, ensuring that research serves humanity responsibly and equitably. Through education, collaboration, and proactive policy-making, the scientific community can uphold its commitment to integrity while navigating the ethical complexities of the future.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Scientific ethics Responsible conduct of research Interdisciplinary collaboration Data privacy Emerging technologies Global research equity
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General > Z00 - General

References

American Anthropological Association (AAA). (2012). Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association.

American Psychological Association (APA). (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

Andorno, R. (2007). Global bioethics at UNESCO: In defense of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(3), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017715

Antes, A. L., et al. (2010). Teaching research ethics: The importance of fostering ethical behavior in researchers. Ethics & Behavior, 20(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508421003595963

Bero, L. (2017). Addressing bias and conflict of interest among biomedical researchers. JAMA, 317(17), 1723–1724. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.3854

Buck, M., & Hamilton, C. (2011). The Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 20(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x

Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–15.

Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. The Guardian.

Carlson, R. V. (2009). The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Past, present, and future. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 57(6), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03495.x

CIHR, NSERC, & SSHRC. (2018). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Government of Canada.

Fischer, B. A., et al. (2014). Teaching research ethics: The case-study approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9478-5

Floridi, L. (2019). The ethics of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Hyun, I., et al. (2008). Bioethics and the future of stem cell research. Nature, 452(7185), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/452345a IEEE. (2019). Ethics in action: Global initiative on ethics of autonomous and intelligent systems. IEEE Standards Association.

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2005468. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468

Jagger, K. S., et al. (2013). Virtual reality for ethics training in health care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(4), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100877

Jasanoff, S. (2017). Science and public reason. Routledge.

Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee syphilis experiment. Free Press.

Keith, D. W. (2013). A case for climate engineering. MIT Press.

Laius, A., Saarna, R., & Teessar, J. (2024). Using vignette methodology to raise awareness of climate change. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 12(2), 164-194.

Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2010). Ethics in engineering. McGraw-Hill Education.

Mittelstadt, B. D., et al. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

(NASEM). (2017). Fostering integrity in research. National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Government Printing Office.

OHRP. (2018). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects ('Common Rule'). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press.

Resnik, D. B. (2020). Ethics in science: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Rodriguez, E. (2016). Ethical issues in genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Journal of Clinical Research & Bioethics, 7(2), 266. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000266

Schroeder, D., et al. (2018). Ethics dumping: Case studies from North-South research collaborations. Springer.

Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2015). Responsible conduct of research. Oxford University Press.

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.

Teessar, J., Rannikmäe, M., Soobard, R., & Laius, A. (2024). Designing and evaluating interactive educational material aimed at increasing climate awareness. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 12(2), 195-220.

UNESCO. (2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2008). Bioethics core curriculum. UNESCO.

Urbina, M. A., et al. (2015). Laboratory plastics and sustainability. Nature, 528(7580), 479–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/528479a Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer.

Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ethics in engineering practice and research. Cambridge University Press. World Medical Association. (2018). WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.