Understanding the Ukrainian Syndrome: Recipes for High and Low Institutional Trust Amid the Military Conflict

Tamilina, Larysa and Ma, Wenting (2024): Understanding the Ukrainian Syndrome: Recipes for High and Low Institutional Trust Amid the Military Conflict. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Conflicts generate profound shocks that destabilize political systems and erode the legitimacy of governing regimes. In the context of Ukraine, these adverse effects have taken on a distinct form, referred to here as the "Ukrainian Syndrome." The phenomenon describes the paradoxical coexistence of a strong belief in the democratic regime with a significant distrust in the political institutions that uphold it. This study seeks to explain the Ukrainian Syndrome by examining the processes of institutional trust formation. The analysis is based on data from a nationally representative survey conducted in November 2024, utilizing fsQCA as the primary methodological framework. The findings reveal that individuals tend to base their trust in political institutions on pragmatic evaluations of institutional performance, largely disregarding ideological commitments to democracy or optimism about Ukraine’s long-term statehood in these assessments. As a result, Ukrainians' aspirations for and commitment to democratic governance persist independently of their trust in democratic institutions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Trust, institutions, democracy, Ukraine, fsQCA.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies

References

Andriani, L., & Sabatini, F. (2015). Trust and prosocial behaviour in a process of state capacity building: The case of the Palestinian territories. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000150

Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configural comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Blind, P. K. (2006). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. Retrieved from https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/building-trust-in-government-in-the-twenty-first-century.pdf

Brudny, Y. M., & Finkel, E. (2011). Why Ukraine is not Russia: Hegemonic national identity and democracy in Russia and Ukraine. East European Politics and Societies, 25(4), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325411401379

Brush, G. J., Guo, X., Hunting, A., & Frethey-Bentham, C. (2024). Using qualitative comparative analysis to identify complex solutions and optimal combinations of conditions influencing COVID vaccine acceptance: A primer for QCA. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(2), 276–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467231182300

Chang, E. C., & Chu, Y. H. (2006). Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies? Journal of Politics, 68(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00422.x

Chen, D. (2017). Local distrust and regime support: Sources and effects of political trust in China. Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917691360

Chu, Y., Chang, Y., & Hu, F. (2003). Regime performance, value change, and authoritarian detachment in East Asia. In Conference on How East Asians View Democracy: The Region in Global Perspective, Taipei, Taiwan, December 8.

Claassen, C. (2019). Does public support help democracy survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12410

Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2001). The dimensions of institutional trust: How distinct is public confidence in the media? Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.

Dong, L., & Kübler, D. (2018). Sources of local political trust in rural China. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(110), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1472575

Dusa, A. (2019). QCA with R: A comprehensive resource. Springer International Publishing.

Emmenegger, P., Schraff, D., & Walter, A. (2014). QCA, the truth table analysis, and large-N survey data: The benefits of calibration and the importance of robustness tests (COMPASSS Working Paper 2014-79). Retrieved from http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/EmmeneggerSchraffWalter2014.pdf

Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263039

Frye, T. (2015). What do voters in Ukraine want? A survey experiment on candidate ethnicity, language, and policy orientation. Problems of Post-Communism, 62(5), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1026200

Godefroidt, A., Langer, A., & Meuleman, B. (2017). Developing political trust in a developing country: The impact of institutional and cultural factors on political trust in Ghana. Democratization, 24(6), 906–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1216899

Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2018). Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017746760

Grönlund, K., & Setälä, M. (2012). In honest officials we trust: Institutional confidence in Europe. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011412946

Grosjean, P. (2014). Conflict and social and political preferences: Evidence from World War II and civil conflict in 35 European countries. Comparative Economic Studies, 56(3), 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2014.5

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526–556. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464498

Habibov, N., Afandi, E., & Cheung, A. (2017). Sand or grease? Corruption-institutional trust nexus in post-Soviet countries. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 8(2), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.05.001

Hadarics, M. (2016). Ideological bases of institutional trust in Eastern and Western Europe and the effect of motivated social cognition. Psychological Thought, 9(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v9i1.164

Hakhverdian, A., & Mayne, Q. (2012). Institutional trust, education, and corruption: A micro-macro interactive approach. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000412

Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695

Haponenko, V., Rykhlik, V., Shulga, M., Bulbeniuk, S., & Naumenko, O. (2024). Informal institutionalization in modern Ukraine. New Perspectives, 32(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X231222001

Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586324

Homonchuk, O. (2024). Ukraine's poor majority: Exploring the driving factors of subjective poverty. International Journal of Social Welfare, 33, 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12577

Hooghe, M., & Zmerli, S. (2011). Introduction: The context of political trust. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust: Why context matters (pp. 1–11). Colchester: ECPR Press.

Hooghe, M., Marien, S., & Oser, J. (2017). Great expectations: The effect of democratic ideals on political trust in European democracies. Contemporary Politics, 23(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1280873

Ilchenko, L. (2023). Довіра до уряду за півтора року знизилася з 74% до 39%, до парламенту з 58% до 21% - КМІС. Економічна правда. https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2023/10/31/706058/

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 41 societies. Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 88–120). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Izha, M., Knyazeva, O., & Pakhomova, T. (2020). The problem of institutional trust in Ukraine and Europe: A comparative analysis. Three Seas Economic Journal, 1(4), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-4-9

Kaasa, A., & Andriani, L. (2022). Determinants of institutional trust: The role of cultural context. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000199

Keele, L. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00241.x

Kholodilin, K. A., Ovchinnikov, V. N., Malkina, M. Yu., & Moiseev, I. A. (2021). Two dimensions of political trust in Russia. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper No. 1934. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3806317

KIIS. (2023). Dynamics of trust in social institutions in 2021-2023. Press releases and reports. Retrieved from https://kiis.com.ua/?cat=reports&id=1335&lang=eng&page=1

Kim, Y., Sommet, N., Na, J., & Spini, D. (2022). Social class—not income inequality—predicts social and institutional trust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621999272

Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge University Press.

Landman, T. (2008). Issues and methods in comparative politics (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

Lankina, T., & Libman, A. (2019). Soviet legacies of economic development, oligarchic rule, and electoral quality in Eastern Europe’s partial democracies. Comparative Politics, 52(1), 127–148.

Leys, C. (1965). What is the problem about corruption? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 3(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00007620

Lindqvist, E., & Östling, R. (2010). Political polarization and the size of government. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000302

Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. (2024). Contradictions that erode institutional trust & opportunities for addressing them. Behavioral Science & Policy, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241256709

Lough, J., & Dubrovskiy, V. (2018). Are Ukraine’s anti-corruption reforms working? Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/2018-11-19-are-ukraine-anticorruption-reforms-workinglough.pdf

Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x

Medve-Bálint, G., & Boda, Z. (2014). The poorer you are, the more you trust? The effect of inequality and income on institutional trust in East-Central Europe. Czech Sociological Review, 50(3), 419–454. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2014.50.3.145

Mendel, J. M., & Ragin, C. C. (2011). FsQCA: Dialog between Jerry M. Mendel and Charles C. Ragin. USC-SIPI Report 411. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959140

Miller, D. (1987). The genesis of configuration. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306538

Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1016

Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002

Morris, S. D., & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010376890

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

Onuch, O., & Hale, H. E. (2022). The Zelensky effect. London: Hurst Publishers.

Ordanini, A., Parasuraman, A., & Rubera, G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513509494

Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310.

Pappas, I. O., Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M., & Pavlou, P. (2017). Value co-creation and trust in social commerce: An fsQCA approach. Paper presented at the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, Guimarães, Portugal (June 5-10).

Pernia, R. A. (2022). Authoritarian values and institutional trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from the Philippines. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891121992118

Plewa, C., Ho, J., Conduit, J., & Karpen, I. O. (2016). Reputation in higher education: A fuzzy set analysis of resource configurations. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3087–3095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.022

Pop-Eleches, G., & Robertson, G. B. (2018). Identity and political preferences in Ukraine – Before and after the Euromaidan. Post-Soviet Affairs, 34(2–3), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1452181

Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242

Przeworski, A., Alvarez, J., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (1996). What makes democracies endure? Journal of Democracy, 7(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0002

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.

Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.

Rose, R., & Mishler, W. (2011). Political trust and distrust in post-authoritarian contexts. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust: Why context matters (pp. 117–140). ECPR Press.

Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge University Press.

Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x

Rutten, R. (2023). Uncertainty, possibility, and causal power in QCA. Sociological Methods & Research, 52(4), 1707–1736. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211031268

Sasse, G., & Lackner, A. (2019). War and state-making in Ukraine: Forging a civic identity from below? Ideology and Politics, 1(12), 75–98.

Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide for qualitative comparative analysis and fuzzy sets in social science. Cambridge University Press.

Schwartz, G. (2020). Class mediations, working-class lives and labour subjectivity in post-socialist Ukraine. The Sociological Review, 68(6), 1338–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120915150

Schwellnus, G. (2013). Eliminating the influence of irrelevant cases on the consistency and coverage of necessary and sufficient conditions in fuzzy-set QCA. Paper presented at the 7th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Bordeaux, France (September 4-7).

Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00004

Shin, D. C., Sin, T., & Sin, T. (2012). Confucianism and democratization in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.

Stoyan, A., Niedzwiecki, S., Morgan, J., Hartly, J., & Espinal, E. (2016). Trust in government institutions: The effects of performance and participation in the Dominican Republic and Haiti. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114551267

Suh, C. S., Chang, P. Y., & Lim, Y. (2012). Spill-up and spill-over of trust: An extended test of cultural and institutional theories of trust in South Korea. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01336.x

Tamilina, L. (2024a). A psycho-historical analysis of nations: The example of Ukraine and Russia. MPRA Working Paper No. 119727. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Tamilina, L. (2024b). Between hope and despair: The values and beliefs of young Ukrainians today. Vox Ukraine. Retrieved from https://voxukraine.org/en/between-hope-and-despair-the-values-and-beliefs-of-young-ukrainians-today

Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. Oxford University Press.

Turchyn, Y., Sukhorolskyi, P., & Sukhorolska, I. (2020). Marking time on the way to democracy in Ukraine: A causal layered analysis. New Perspectives, 28(2), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X20911287

Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.

Wang, X., & Wan Wart, M. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perception. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00700.x

Warren, M. E. (1999). Conclusion. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy & trust (pp. 346–360). Cambridge University Press.

Williams, M., Mulvey, P. W., & Mayer, R. C. (2024). Restoring trust in employers: Diagnosing and treating the perception that an organization has “multiple personalities.” Behavioral Science & Policy, 9(2), XX–XX. https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241246126

Wu, J., An, W., Zheng, X., & Zhang, J. (2021). How business model designs influence firm growth in a transforming economy: A configurational perspective. Management and Organization Review, 17(2), 226–253.

Zabyelina, Y. (2019). Vigilante justice and informal policing in post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, 35(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2019.1601460

Zhai, Y. (2016). Remarkable economic growth, but so what? The impacts of modernization on Chinese citizens’ political satisfaction. International Political Science Review, 37(4), 533–549.

Zhai, Y. (2018). Traditional values and political trust in China. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(3), 350–365.

Zmerli, S. (2012). Social structure and political trust in Europe: Mapping contextual preconditions of a relational concept. In O. W. Gabriel & S. I. Keil (Eds.), Society and democracy in Europe (pp. 111–138). Routledge.

Zmerli, S., & Castillo, J. C. (2015). Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America. Social Science Research, 52, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.004