Borooah, Vani (2023): Adjudication in Cricket. Published in: Routledge Studies in Gender and Economics : pp. 81-107.
PDF
MPRA_paper_123268.pdf Download (281kB) |
Abstract
This chapter examines gender inequality in the quality of adjudication in cricket matches. First, all the benefits of neutral umpires in Test Matches are exclusive to men’s Test Matches and have bypassed the women’s game entirely. Second, most of the benefits of the Decision Review System have accrued, through its regular usage in men’s games, to men who, through constant exposure to DRS, have become adept at its use. In contrast, the sporadic use of DRS in women’s matches has had two effects: firstly, the benefits of DRS to women are occasional; secondly, these occasional benefits have been further diluted because the intermittent availability of DRS to women cricketers means that they have found it difficult to learn the art and the tricks of using the system effectively.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Adjudication in Cricket |
English Title: | Adjudication in Cricket |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cricket, Decision Review System, Bayes Theorem |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General |
Item ID: | 123268 |
Depositing User: | Vani / K Borooah |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2025 09:10 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jan 2025 09:10 |
References: | Borooah, V.K. (2016), “Upstairs and Downstairs: The Imperfections of Cricket’s Decision Review System”, Journal of Sports Economics, 17: 64–85. Cameron, L. (2020), CA Flags ‘Big-Bash Specific’ DRS for 2021–22 Summer, Melbourne: Cricket Australia. https://www.cricket.com.au/news/decision-review-system-drs-introduction-big-bash-league-bbl11-alistair-dobson/2020-12-28 (accessed 18 August 2021). Collins, H. (2010), “The Philosophy of Umpiring and the Introduction of Decision-Aid Technology”, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 37: 135–146. Collins, H., and Evans, R. (2008), “You Cannot Be Serious! Public Understanding of Technology with Special Reference to ‘Hawk-Eye’”, Public Understanding of Science, 17: 283–308. Collins, H., and Evans, R. (2012), “Sport-Decision Aids and the ‘CSI-effect’: Why Cricket Uses Hawk-Eye Well and Tennis Uses it Badly”, Public Understanding of Science, 21: 904–921. Collins, H., Evans, R., and Higgins, C. (2016), Bad Call: Technology’s Attack on Umpires and How to Fix it, Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Fisher, R.A. (1920), “A Mathematical Examination of the Methods of Determining the Accuracy of an Observation by the Mean Square and the Mean Square Error”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 80: 758–770. ICC (International Cricket Council) (2017), Men’s Test Match Playing Conditions. ICC-Men’s-Test-Match-Playing-Conditions-2017-Code-FINAL-051017.pdf (accessed 22 July 2021). Leamon, N., and Jones, B. (2021), Hitting Against the Spin, London: Constable, Little Brown Book Group. Nicholson, R. (2020), “How Can Women’s Cricket Learn to Use the DRS Better?”, ESPN Cricinfo 4 March. https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/raf-nicholson-how-can-women-s-cricket-learn-to-use-the-drs-better-1218360 (accessed 23 July 2021). Owens, N., Harris, C., and Stennett, C. (2003) “Hawk-Eye Tennis System,” in VIE 2003: International Conference on Visual Information Engineering: Ideas, Applications, Experience, 7–9 July, University of Surrey, Guildford (182–185). Pandey, D. (2020), “Limited DRS Has Teams Fretting: BCCI Says Full Version Too Expensive”, The Indian Express 12 March. https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/limited-drs-has-teams-fretting-bcci-says-full-version-too-expensive-6309734/ (accessed 18 August 2021). Peters, C.A.F. (1856), “Uber die Bestimmung des wahrscheimlichen Fehlers einer Beobachtung aus den Abweichungen der Beobachtungen von ihrem arithmetischen Mittel,” Astronomische Nachrichen, 44: 30–31. Rajesh, S. (2003), “Give Hawk-Eye a Chance”, ESPN Cricinfo, 13 June. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/125938.html (accessed 24 July 2021). Rajesh, S. (2006), “A Threat or an Advantage”, ESPN Cricinfo, 18 December. http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/story/250359.html (accessed 24 July 2021). Steen, R. (2011), “Going Upstairs: The Decision Review System – a Velvet Revolution or the Thin Edge of an Ethical Wedge?”, Sport in Society, 14: 1428–1440. Stigler, G.J. (1971), “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2: 3–21. Williamson, L. (2010), “Techno Boffins Don’t See Hawk-Eye-to-Virtual Eye as Reliability of Video Evidence Questioned”, Mail Online, 10 December. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-1337280/ASHES-2010-Techno-boffins-dont-Hawk-eye-Virtual-Eye-reliability-video-evidence-questioned.html (accessed 24 July 2021). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/123268 |