Scientific Production Convergence: An Empirical Analysis Across Nations

Barrios, Candelaria and Flores, Esther and Martínez, M. Ángeles (2021): Scientific Production Convergence: An Empirical Analysis Across Nations. Published in: Minerva

Abstract

Countries’ scientifc systems are a key element of the knowledge economy. This paper explores the convergence pattern of the scientifc systems of a wide range of countries around the world during the period 2003–2016. Drawing on data on national scientifc production from a sample of 121 developed and developing countries, the log t test methodology has been used to detect whether there has been an overall convergence in knowledge creation among countries, if they have converged in clubs, or if there have been divergent countries. The results show the absence of overall convergence; on the contrary, the presence of fve groups of countries that converge together has been detected, showing diferentiated knowledge production growth trajectories among them. A divergent country (UK) has also been identifed. Furthermore, the paper examines the scientifc structure of these clubs and the countries that form them, identifying in which scientifc felds the scientific systems of countries have a comparative advantage/disadvantage in relation to the world average.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Scientifc production · Club convergence · Log t test · Scientifc structure
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O39 - Other; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries

References

Albuquerque, Eduardo. 2001. Scientifc infrastructure and catching up process. Revista Brasileira de Economia 55: 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402001000400005.

Apergis, Nicholas, Christina Christou, and Stephen M. Miller. 2014. Country and industry convergence of equity markets: International evidence from club convergence and clustering. North AmericanJournal of Economics and Finance 29: 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2014.05.002.

Archibugi, Daniel, and Mario Pianta. 1992. The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries: A Report to the EEC on International Science and Technology Activities (Vol. 13188). Springer Science & Business Media.

Asongu, Simplice A. 2017. Knowledge economy gaps, policy syndromes and catch-up strategies: Fresh South Korean lessons to Africa. Journal of Knowledge Economy 8: 211–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0321-0.

Asongu, Simplice A., and Jacinta C. Nwachukwu. 2016. Brief future of time in the monopoly of scientifc knowledge. Comparative Economic Studies 58: 638–671. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-016-0008-y.

Balassa, Bela. 1965. Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School 33:99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x. Bartkowska, Monika, and Aleksandra Riedl. 2012. Regional convergence clubs in Europe: Identifcation and conditioning factors. Economic Modelling 29: 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.01.013.

Bernard, Andrew B. B., and Steven N. Durlauf. 1995. Convergence in international outputs. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10: 97–108.4651 3

Bernard, Andrew B. B., and Steven N. Durlauf. 1996. Interpreting tests of convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics 71: 161–173.

Bernardes, Américo T., and Eduardo da Motta Albuquerque. 2003. Cross-over, thresholds and the interactions between science and technology: Lessons for less-developed countries. Research Policy 32:867–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00089-6.

Caraça, João, Bengt A. Lundvall, and Sandro Mendonça. 2009. The changing role of science in the innovation process: From queen to Cinderella? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76: 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.003.

Carlino, Gerald A., and Leonard O. Mills. 1993. Are US incomes converging? A time series analysis.Journal of Monetary Economics 32: 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90009-5.

Castellacci, Fulvio. 2007. Evolutionary and new growth theories. Are they converging? Journal of Economic Surveys 21: 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00515.x.

Chen, Derek H.C., and Carl J. Dahlman 2005. The knowledge economy, the KAM methodology and World Bank operations. World Bank Institute Working Paper (37256). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/695211468153873436/The-knowledge-economy-the-KAM-methodology-andWorld-Bank-operations. Accessed 9 March 2021.

Chen, Rex H.G., and Chi M. Chen. 2016. Visualizing the world’s scientifc publications. Journal of theAssociation for Information Science and Technology 67: 2477–2488. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23591.

Coccia, Mario. 2019. Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society 59: 101124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007.

Coccia, Mario, Greta Falavigna, and Alessandro Manello. 2015. The impact of hybrid public and marketoriented fnancing mechanisms on scientifc portfolio and performances of public research labs: A scientometric analysis. Scientometrics 102: 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1427-z.

Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.

Confraria, Hugo, Manuel M. Godinho, and Lili Wang. 2017. Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy 46: 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.004.

Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorf. 1995. The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review 14:14–19.

Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorf. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘“Mode 2”’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.

Fagerberg, Jan. 1987. A technology gap approach to why growth rates difer. Research Policy 16:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4.

Freeman, Christopher. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

Gantman, Ernesto R. 2012. Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientifc productivity of countries. Scientometrics 93: 967–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0736-3.

Glänzel, Wolfgang. 2001. National characteristics in international scientifc co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 51(1): 69–115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010512628145.

Gui, Qinchang, Chengliang Liu, and Debin Du. 2019. Globalization of science and international scientifc collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum 105: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017.

Harzing, Anne-Wil, and Axèle Giroud. 2014. The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics 8: 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.10.007.

Hollanders, Hugo, and Luc Soete. 2011. The Growing Role of Knowledge in the Global Economy, UNESCO Science Report 2010: 1–28. Paris: UNESCO. http://www.unesco.org/new/fleadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/sc_usr10_role knowledge_EN.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2021.

Horta, Hugo. 2018. The declining scientifc wealth of Hong Kong and Singapore. Scientometrics 117: 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2845-0.

Isaksen, Arne, and Magnus Nilsson. 2013. Combined innovation policy: Linking scientifc and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies 21(12): 1919–1936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722966.466 C. Barrios González et al.1 3

Jensen, Morten B., Björn Johnson, Edward Lorenz, and Bengt A. Lundvall. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36: 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.

Klevorick, Alvin K., Richard C. Levin, Richard R. Nelson, and Sidney G. Winter. 1995. On the sources and signifcance of inter-industry diferences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24: 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I.

Kline, Stephen J., and Nathan Rosenberg. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, eds. Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg, 275–305. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Lafuente, Juan Á., Amparo Marco, Mercedes Monfort, and Javier Ordóñez. 2020. Social exclusion and convergence in the EU: An assessment of the Europe 2020 strategy. Sustainability 12(5):1843.

Lattimore, Ralph, and John Revesz. 1996. Australian science: Performance from published papers.Bureau of Industry Economics, Report, 96(3). Australian Government Publishing Service. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/science-papers/96-03.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2021.

López-Illescas, Carmen, Félix de Moya-Anegón, and Henk F. Moed. 2011. A ranking of universities should account for diferences in their disciplinary specialization. Scientometrics 88(2): 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0398-6.

Lucas, Robert E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.

Monfort, Mercedes, Juan C. Cuestas, and Javier Ordóñez. 2013. Real convergence in Europe: A cluster analysis. Economic Modelling 33: 689–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.05.015.

Moya-Anegón, Félix, and Víctor Herrero-Solana. 2013. Worldwide topology of the scientifc subject profle: A macro approach in the country level. PLoS ONE 8: e83222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083222.

Mueller, Christoph E. 2016. Accurate forecast of countries’ research output by macro-level indicators.Scientometrics 109: 1307–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2084-1. National Science Foundation. 2016. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. http://www.nsf.gov/. Accessed 9 March 2021.

Nelson, R., and N. Rosenberg. 1993. Technical innovation and national systems. In National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Richard R. Nelson, 3–21. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Nguyen, Tuan V., and Ly T. Pham. 2011. Scientifc output and its relationship to knowledge economy: An analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics 89: 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0446-2.

Nguyen, Tuan V., Thao P. Ho-Le, and Ut V. Le. 2017. International collaboration in scientifc researchin Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics 110: 1035–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2201-1.

OECD. 1996. The knowledge-based economy, in OECD, STI Outlook, Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/ofcialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=OCDE/GD%2896%29102&docLanguage=En. Accessed 9 March 2021.

Phillips, Peter C. B., and Donggyu Sul. 2007. Transition modeling and econometric convergence test. Econometrica 75: 1771–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x.

Phillips, Peter C. B., and Donggyu Sul. 2009. Economic transition and growth. Journal of Applied Econometrics 24: 1153–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1080.

Piro, Fredrik N., Dag W. Aksnes, and Kristofer Rørstad. 2013. A macro analysis of productivity diferences across felds: Challenges in the measurement of scientifc publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64: 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22746.

Radosevic, Slavo, and Esin Yoruk. 2014. Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching-up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics 101: 1897–1924. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11192-014-1344-1.

Romer, Paul M. 1986. Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94:1002–1036.

Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Solow, Robert M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513.

Stephan, Paula E. 1996. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1199–1235.467 1 3

Swan, Trevor W. 1956. Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record 32: 334–361.

Verspagen, Bart. 1992. Endogenous innovation in neo-classical growth models: A survey. Journal of Macroeconomics 14: 631–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(92)90004-R.

Veugelers, Reinhilde. 2010. Towards a multipolar science world: trends and impact. Scientometrics 82:439–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0045-7.

World Bank. 2007. Building Knowledge Economies : Advanced Strategies for Development. WBI Development Studies. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6853. Accessed 9 March 2021.

Yang, Li Y., Ting Yue, T., Jie L. Ding, and Tao Han. 2012. A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 93: 497–516.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0695-8.

Yi, Yong, Wei Qi, and Dandan Wu. 2013. Are CIVETS the next BRICs? A comparative analysis from a scientometrics perspective. Scientometrics 94: 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0791-9.

Zhou, Qiuju, Ronald Rousseau, Liying Yang, Ting Yue, and Guoliang Yang. 2012. A general framework for describing diversity within systems and similarity between systems with applications in informetrics. Scientometrics 93: 787–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0767-9.