Analysis of Carbon Markets and Offset Alternatives in Compliance and Voluntary Schemes to Commercialise Colombian Neutral Coal

Cotte Poveda, Alexander and Pardo Martínez, Clara Inés (2024): Analysis of Carbon Markets and Offset Alternatives in Compliance and Voluntary Schemes to Commercialise Colombian Neutral Coal. Published in: Journal of Sustainability Research , Vol. 3, No. 6 (22 July 2024): pp. 1-27.

Abstract

This study examines the opportunities in the international carbon market to commercialise coal offsets from the forest economy for compliance schemes and the voluntary market within carbon-neutral and economic diversification strategies using Colombia as a case study due to the importance of coal for the country’s economy and its position as a producer. Consideration is given to opportunities in the international carbon markets that can serve as an instrument to decrease global greenhouse emissions. In recent years, the two modalities (compliance and voluntary) of carbon markets have been growing. To the extent that more drastic policies are generated against emissions and the price of credits and/or offsets, the market price of a credit is above US$20. It is estimated that credits based on nature and generate co-benefits will have the greatest commercialisation potential. In this regard, Colombia has multiple possibilities that could generate a competitive advantage when connected with the commercialisation of carbon. Country-level analyses indicate that the Colombian neutral coal industry has great potential among the regions and countries studied when considering the objectives of the established emissions trading scheme, which in most cases includes the electricity generating sector with a maximum of compensation. Conservatively, this could generate demand for Colombian neutral coal of 5%–10% of the credits and/or required offsets. In the voluntary market, the expectations are positive since many companies that use coal as an input and/or that rely on emission reduction objectives could opt for this strategy to enjoy the co-benefits that this innovative way of marketing coal offers. Colombian carbon neutrality has potential both in the voluntary and regulated carbon markets; efforts could start in the voluntary market and then carry out specific negotiations with countries that have a regulated market. In addition, including projects based on nature, especially reforestation and REDD, will be very beneficial since this sector is expected to experience the greatest growth in the creation of bonds. In addition, with the new rules of the COP26, there will be greater security and certainty in integrity and accounting issues, will be positive for the carbon neutral and economic diversification strategy. Furthermore, how the agreements are implemented to identify opportunities and strategies in their implementation should also be monitored. These elements will be fundamental in the analysis of carbon neutrality strategies in Colombia.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: compliance carbon market; voluntary carbon market; offsets; Colombian coal
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure

References

1. European Commission. International carbon market. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu- ets/international-carbon-market_en. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

2. LSEG. Why do carbon markets matter to COP26? Available from: https://www.refinitiv.com/perspectives/market-insights/cop26-carbon- markets-matter-four-key-trends/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

3. Kapnick S. The global carbon market: How offsets, regulations and new standards may catalyze lower emissions and create new opportunities. Available from: https://am.jpmorgan.com/ us/en/asset-management/adv/ insights/portfolio-insights/sustainable-investing/the-global-carbon-market/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

4. Zelikova J, Chay F, Freeman J, Cullenward D. A buyer’s guide to soil carbon offsets. Available from: https://carbonplan.org/research/soil-protocols- explainer. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

5. Chatterjee S, Kuo-Wei H. Unrealistic energy and materials requirement for direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3287.

6. Lebling K, McQueen N, Pisciotta M. Direct Air Capture: Resource Considerations and Costs for Carbon Removal. Available from: https://impakter.com/direct-air-capture-resource-considerations-and-costs- for-carbon-removal/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

7. Portugal P. The Low-Carbon Transition—Why are compliance and voluntary carbon markets so important? Available from: https://www.afme.eu/ News/Views-from-AFME/Details/The-Low-Carbon-Transition--Why-are- compliance-and-voluntary-carbon-markets-so-important. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

8. Bousfield C, Massam M, Peres C, Edwards D. Carbon payments can cost- effectively improve logging sustainability in the Amazon. J Environ Mange. 2022;314:115094.

9. Shilland R, Grimsditch G, Ahmed M, Bandeira S, Kennedy H, Potouroglou M, et al. A question of standards: Adapting carbon and other PES markets to work for community seagrass conservation. Mar Policy. 2021;129:104574.

10. Jayasuriya M, Germain R, Wagner J. Protecting timberland RMZs through carbon markets: A protocol for riparian carbon offsets. Forest Policy Econ. 2020;111:102084.

11. Köhl M, Neupane P, Mundhenk P. REDD+ measurement, reporting and verification—A cost trap? Implications for financing REDD+MRV costs by result-based payments. Ecol Econ. 2020;168:106513.

12. Boer H. The role of government in operationalising markets for REDD+ in Indonesia. Forest Policy Econ. 2018;86:4-12. 13. Aziz A, Thomas S, Dargusch P, Phinn S. Assessing the potential of REDD+ in a production mangrove forest in Malaysia using stakeholder analysis and ecosystem services mapping. Mar Policy. 2016;74:6-17.

14. Vijge M, Brockhaus M, Di Gregorio M, Muharrom E. Framing national REDD+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance: A comparative analysis of seven countries. Global Environ Chang. 2016;39:57-68.

15. Junming Z, Xiao L, Yichun F, Haijia S, Lei Z. Effect of carbon market on air pollution: Firm-level evidence in China. Resour Conserv Recy. 2022;182:106321.

16. Rong M, Haoqi Q. Plant-Level Evaluation of China’s National Emissions Trading Scheme: Benchmark Matters. Clim Chang Econ. 2022;13:2240009.

17. Genovese F. Market responses to global governance: International climate cooperation and Europe’s carbon trading. Bus Polit. 2021;23:91-123.

18. Shuo H, Zhong W, Jian C, Ning C. Optimal Technology Investment under Emission Trading Policy. J Syst Sci Syst Eng. 2020;29:143-62.

19. Borozan S, Krkoleva M, Petar K. Progress of the electricity sectors in South East Europe: Challenges and opportunities in achieving compliance with EU energy policy. Energy Rep. 2021;7:8730-41.

20. Jingyan F, Artie N. Scaling up renewable energy assets: Issuing green bond via structured public-private collaboration for managing risk in an emerging economy. Energies. 2021;14:3076.

21. Weiss O, Pareschi G, Georges G, Boulouchos K. The Swiss energy transition: Policies to address the Energy Trilemma. Energ Policy. 2021;148:111926.

22. Lu G, Sugino M, Arimura T, Horie T. Success and failure of the voluntary action plan: Disaggregated sector decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Japan. Energ Policy. 2022;163:112850.

23. Jiang Y, Luo L, Zu J, Shao X. The value relevance of corporate voluntary carbon disclosure: Evidence from the United States and BRIC countries. J Contemp Account Ec. 2021;17:100279.

24. Alsaifi K, Elnahass M, Salama A. Market responses to firms’ voluntary carbon disclosure: Empirical evidence from the United Kingdom. J Clean Prod. 2020;262:121377.

25. Yue X, Peng M, Anser M, Nassani A, Haffar M, Zaman K. The role of carbon taxes, clean fuels, and renewable energy in promoting sustainable development: How green is nuclear energy? Renew Energ. 2022;193:167-78.

26. Zhang M, Yang Z, Liu L, Zhou D. Impact of renewable energy investment on carbon emissions in China—An empirical study using a nonparametric additive regression model. Sci Total Environ. 2021;785:147109.

27. Herbes C, Rilling B, MacDonald S, Boutin N, Bigerna S. Are voluntary markets effective in replacing state-led support for the expansion of renewables?—A comparative analysis of voluntary green electricity markets in the UK, Germany, France and Italy. Energ Policy. 2020;141:111473.

28. Tao Y, Duan M, Deng Z. Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to explain willingness towards voluntary carbon offsetting among Chinese consumers. Ecol Econ. 2021;185:107068.

29. Gunter S, Staake T, Schob S, Tiefenbeck V. The behavioral response to a corporate carbon offset program: A field experiment on adverse effects and mitigation strategies. Global Environ Chang. 2020;64:102123.

30. MacDonald S, Eyre N. An international review of markets for voluntary green electricity tariffs. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;91:180-92.

31. Ritchie B, Kemperman A, Dolnicar S. Which types of product attributes lead to aviation voluntary carbon offsetting among air passengers? Tourism Manage. 2021;85:104276.

32. Heintzman P. The potential for voluntary carbon offset programs in the Canadian snow-based outdoor recreation industry. J Outdoor Rec Tour. 2021;36:100422.

33. Shiyuan Z, Ying-En G, Xiaowen F, Changming J. Voluntary carbon offset and airline alliance. Transportation Res B Meth. 2019;123:110-26.

34. Ministry of Mines and Energy of Colombia. Coal mining in Colombia: Transforming the future of the industry. Available from: https://www.minenergia.gov.co/documents/ 10192/24311177/documento +carbon%284%29.pdf. Accessed 2022 Nov 23.

35. Climate Finance Innovators. Update June 2019: Moving towards next generation carbon markets—Observations from Article 6 pilots. Available from: https://www.climatefinanceinnovators.com/ publication/update-june- 2019-moving-towards-next-generation-carbon-markets-observations-from- article-6-pilots/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

36. LSEG. Carbon market year in review 2020. Available from: www.refinitiv.com. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

37. Balsalobre-Lorente D, Abbas J, He C, Pilař L, Shah S. Tourism, urbanization and natural resources rents matter for environmental sustainability: The leading role of AI and ICT on sustainable development goals in the digital era. Resour Policy. 2023;82:103445.

38. Caglar A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Akin C. Analysing the ecological footprint in EU-5 countries under a scenario of carbon neutrality: Evidence from newly developed sharp and smooth structural breaks in unit root testing. J Environ Manage. 2021;295:113155.

39. Michaelowa A, Shishlov I, Hoch S, Bofill P, Espelage A. Overview and comparison of existing carbon crediting schemes. Available from: https://www.nefco.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/NICA-Crediting-Mechanis ms-Final-February-2019.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

40. UNEP-CCC. CDM Pipeline. Available from: http://www.cdmpipeline.org/ index.htm. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

41. United Nations Carbon Offset Platform. What is offsetting? Available from: https://offset.climateneutralnow.org/aboutoffsetting. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

42. ICAP. Emissions Trading Worldwide: ICAP Status Report 2020. Available from: https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide- icap-status-report-2020. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

43. Trove Research. Future Demand, Supply and Prices for Voluntary Carbon Credits—Keeping the Balance. Available from: www.trove-research.com. Accessed 2022 Apr 13.

44. Ecosystem Market Place. Markets in Motion: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2021. Available from: www.ecosystemmarketplace.com. Accessed 2022 Aug 14.

45. Berkeley Carbon Trading Project. The Voluntary Registry Offsets Database. Available from: https://gspp.berkeley.edu/faculty-and-impact/centers/cepp/ projects/berkeley-carbon-trading-project/offsets-database. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

46. Statista. Trend in Carbon Offset Purchases. Available from: https://www. statista.com/chart/ 23751/companies-buying-carbon-offsets/. Accessed 2022 Nov 19.

47. GRI. Database Reports. Available from: https://www.globalreporting.org/ search/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

48. VERRA. Data and Insights. Available from: https://verra.org/datainsights/data- and-insights-january-2022/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

49. Science Based Targets. Companies taking action. Available from: https://sciencebasedtargets.org/ companies-taking-action#table. Accessed 2023 Jan 26.

50. Environmental Defense Fund. Trends in the Voluntary Carbon Markets: Where We Are and What’s Next. Available from: https://www.edf.org/ sites/default/files/documents/trends-voluntary-carbon-markets_1.pdf. Accessed 2023 Mar 5.

51. Schneider L. Glasgow delivered rules for international carbon markets—how good or bad are they? Available from: https://blog.oeko.de/glasgow-delivered- rules-for-international-carbon-markets-how-good-or-bad-are-they-cop26/. Accessed 2022 Jun 11.

52. Carbon Market Institute. COP26 Glasgow Climate Pact ushers in the final Paris Rulebook. Available from: https://carbonmarketinstitute.org/2021/11/14/cop 26-glasgow-climate-pact-ushers-in-the-final-paris-rulebook/. Accessed 2024 Jun 26.

53. Stern P, Wolske P, Dietz T. Design principles for climate change decisions. Curr Opin Env Sust. 2021;52:9-18.

54. Watt R. The fantasy of carbon offsetting. Environ Polit. 2021;30(7):1069-88.

55. Balsalobre-Lorente D, Nur T, Topaloglu E, Evcimen C. Assessing the impact of the economic complexity on the ecological footprint in G7 countries: Fresh evidence under human development and energy innovation processes. Gondwana Res. 2024;127:226-45.

56. Esmaeili P, Rafei M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Adedoyin FF. The role of economic policy uncertainty and social welfare in the view of ecological footprint: evidence from the traditional and novel platform in panel ARDL approaches. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2023;30(5):13048-66.

57. Rafei M, Esmaeili P, Balsalobre-Lorente D. A step towards environmental mitigation: How do economic complexity and natural resources matter? Focusing on different institutional quality level countries. Resour Policy. 2022;78:102848.