How China's Rural Health Program Lifted Incomes: Evidence from 800 Million Beneficiaries

Huang, Kaixing and Hou, Hao (2025): How China's Rural Health Program Lifted Incomes: Evidence from 800 Million Beneficiaries.

Abstract

This study evaluates the economic impact of the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China, the world's largest rural public health program, covering over 800 million rural residents. Using longitudinal survey data from villages that gained access to the program in different years, we find that the program improved the probability of being in good health by 4.4% to 8.2% across age groups. For the average participating household, per capita income increased by 20.3% over a decade, driven primarily by greater off-farm labor participation and higher wages, alongside significant agricultural income growth. The aggregate income gains were six times the government's program investments. These effects can be replicated by a structural model that characterizes the health investments and labor allocation of utility-maximizing rural residents. Counterfactual analyses based on the structural model suggest that China could further increase the program's benefits by raising the reimbursement rate up to 0.8 (but not beyond). Additionally, eliminating the current cross-province reimbursement constraints would further boost income gains by 18.7%.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: rural public health insurance, income, health, migration
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I13 - Health Insurance, Public and Private; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration ; Regional Labor Markets ; Population ; Neighborhood Characteristics

References

1. Banerjee, Abhijit, Rema Hanna, Benjamin A Olken, and Dmitry Sverdlin Lisker, “Social Protection in the Developing World,” National Bureau of Economic Research, 2024.

2. Bartel, Ann and Paul Taubman, “Health and labor market success: The role of various diseases,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979, pp. 1–8.

3. Borusyak, Kirill, Xavier Jaravel, and Jann Spiess, “Revisiting event-study designs: robust and efficient estimation,” Review of Economic Studies, 2024, 91 (6), 3253–3285.

4. Fadlon, Itzik and Torben Heien Nielsen, “Family labor supply responses to severe health shocks: Evidence from Danish administrative records,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2021, 13 (3), 1–30.

5. Galiani, Sebastian, Alvin Murphy, and Juan Pantano,“Estimating Neighborhood Choice Models: Lessons from a Housing Assistance Experiment,” American Economic Review, November 2015, 105 (11), 3385–3415.

6. Kaboski, Joseph P. and Robert M. Townsend, “A Structural Evaluation of a Large-Scale Quasi-Experimental Microfinance Initiative,” Econometrica, 2011, 79 (5), 1357–1406.