In “Sustainability” We Trust?: The Need for a New Approach to Resource Preservation

Ozili, Peterson K (2025): In “Sustainability” We Trust?: The Need for a New Approach to Resource Preservation. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Sustainability is a buzzword that has gained traction around the world. It is linked to, or synonymous with, environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles. The advocacy for sustainability has led many individuals, corporations and governments to incorporate ESG principles into their operations and processes, and communicate to stakeholders how they are meeting sustainability expectations and its role in the value creation process in society. Despite these strides, a critical mind would ask some important philosophical questions: Does “society” need sustainability? The answer is yes. Is the sustainability agenda good for the world? The answer is yes. But is sustainability the only way to conserve environmental, social and governance resources to make it available for the present and future generations? The answer is, no? This article discusses sustainability and argues that sustainability is a way to achieve the goal of resource preservation and continuity for the present and future generations, but it is not the only way. It critique attempts to present sustainability as the only way to achieve the goal of resource preservation. While this study does not offer an alternative way to achieve the goal of resource preservation for the present and future generations, it call on scholars to explore alternative ways to achieve the goal of resource preservation for the present and future generations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: sustainability, sustainable development, renewable energy, fossil fuels, ESG, information
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development

References

Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42539-42559.

Babcicky, P. (2013). Rethinking the foundations of sustainability measurement: the limitations of the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI). Social Indicators Research, 113, 133-157.

Briera, T., & Lefèvre, J. (2024). Reducing the cost of capital through international climate finance to accelerate the renewable energy transition in developing countries. Energy Policy, 188, 114104.

Delai, I., & Takahashi, S. (2011). Sustainability measurement system: a reference model proposal. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 438-471.

Hege, E., Brimont, L., & Pagnon, F. (2019). Sustainable development goals and indicators: can they be tools to make national budgets more sustainable?. Public Sector Economics, 43(4), 423-444.

High, M. M. (2024). Resisting renewable energy transitions: Innovation as a moral trope in the US oil and gas industry. Critique of Anthropology, 44(3), 219-234.

Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448.

Linke, A., & Raleigh, C. (2023). Conflict and cooperation: the adverse effects of climate change. In Making Geographies of Peace and Conflict (pp. 237-255). Routledge.

Olafsson, S., Cook, D., Davidsdottir, B., & Johannsdottir, L. (2014). Measuring countries׳ environmental sustainability performance–A review and case study of Iceland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 934-948.