Mirjalili, Seyed hossein (2013): بررسی دو متن درسی در اقتصاد کلان. Published in: Critical Studies in Texts and Programs of Human Science , Vol. 13, No. 2 (24 August 2013): pp. 109-134.
![]() |
PDF
MPRA_paper_125866.pdf Download (264kB) |
Abstract
The selection of appropriate textbooks plays a crucial role in shaping the quality of teaching and learning in economics. This study evaluates Macroeconomics by Dr. Rahmani and Macroeconomics by Branson, which are widely used in undergraduate and graduate programs in Iranian higher education. The analysis focuses on two main dimensions: (1) the analytical framework adopted, and (2) the extent to which the textbooks reflect current developments in the field. Both texts primarily rely on the traditional structure of macroeconomics instruction, grounded in the neoclassical–Keynesian synthesis. To assess analytical rigor and up-to-dateness, Dr. Rahmani’s Macroeconomics is compared with Blanchard’s Macroeconomics, which is recognized internationally as a standard text based on the neoclassical–Keynesian synthesis. Similarly, Branson’s Macroeconomics is evaluated against Romer’s Macroeconomics, a standard reference for advanced macroeconomics. The comparison highlights areas where the Iranian textbooks fail to incorporate more recent theoretical and empirical developments, and the missing concepts are explicitly identified.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | بررسی دو متن درسی در اقتصاد کلان |
English Title: | A Review of Two Macroeconomics Textbooks |
Language: | Persian |
Keywords: | Undergraduate Macroeconomics, Intermediate Macroeconomics, Neoclassical Synthesis, Textbook Evaluation, Higher Education, Comparative Analysis. |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General |
Item ID: | 125866 |
Depositing User: | Prof. seyed hossein mirjalili |
Date Deposited: | 22 Aug 2025 12:58 |
Last Modified: | 22 Aug 2025 12:58 |
References: | Mirjalili, Seyed Hossein (2010). “A Review of the Book Theory and Policies of Macroeconomics.” Quarterly Journal of the Stock Exchange, No. 10. Backhouse, Roger (1996). Interpreting Macroeconomics, Explorations in the History of Macroeconomic Thought, Routledge. Backhouse, Roger and David Laidler (2004). “What Was Lost with IS-LM”, History of Political Economy, Vol.36, Supplement. Barens, Ingo (1997). “What Went Wrong with IS-LM/AS-AD Analysis and Why?”, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol.23, No.1. Barro, Robert (2008). Macroeconomics, A Modern Approach, Thomson. Blanchard, Olivier (2008). “Neoclassical Synthesis”, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, Macmillan Press. Blanchard, Olivier (2011). Macroeconomics, 5th Edition, Prentice-Hall. Branson, William H. (1989). Macroeconomic Theory and Policy, 3th Edition, Harper and Row Publishers. Colander, David (1995). “The Stories We Tell: A Reconsideration of AS/AD Analysis”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.9, No.3. Colander, David (2004). “The Strange Persistence of the IS/LM Model”, History of Political Economy, Vol.36, Supplement. Darlauf, Steven and Donald Hester (2008). IS-LM, 2nd Edition, Macmillan. De Araujo, Pedro; Roisin O’Sullivan and Nicole Simpson (2012). What Should be Thought in Intermediate Macroeconomics. De Vory, M. and Malgrange (2011). The History of Macroeconomics from Keynes’s General Theory to the Present, University of Louvain. Froyen, Richard (1996). “The Evolution of Macroeconomic Theory and Implications for Teaching Intermediate Macroeconomics”, Journal of Economic Education. Geithman, David (1994). “A Note on Teaching the Aggregate Supply-Aggregate Demand Model”, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol.20, No.4. Goodfriend, Marvin (2002). “Monetary Policy in the New Neoclassical Synthesis: A Primer”, International Finance, Vol.5, No.2. Jones, Charles (2011). Macroeconomics, Norton and Company. king, Robert (1993). “Will the New Keynesian Macroeconomics Resurrect the IS-LM Model?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.7, No.1. King, Robert (2000). “The New IS-LM Model: Language, Logic and Limits”, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol.86, No.3. Mishkin, Frederic (2012). Macroeconomics Policy and Practice, Addison-Wesley. Nelson, Edward (2008). IS-LM in Modern Macro, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, Macmillan. Patinkin, Don (1965). Money, Interest and Prices, 2nd Edition, Harper and Row Publisher. Romer, David (2000). “Keynesian Macroeconomics without the LM Curve”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.14, No.2. Romer, David (2006). Advanced Macroeconomics, 3rd Edition, MacGraw-Hill. Taylor, John (2000). “Teaching Modern Macroeconomics at the Principle Level”, American Economic Review, 90 (2). Weerapana, Akila (2003). “Intrmediate Macroeconomics without IS-LM Model”, Journal of Economics Education. Williamson, Stephen (2011). Macroeconomics, Pearson. Woodford, Michael (2009). “Convergence in Macroeconomics: Elements of the New Synthesis”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. Young, Warren; and Ben Zilberfard (eds.) (2000). IS-LM and Modern Macroeconomics, Kluwer Academic Publishers. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/125866 |