Cotte, Alexander and Ronderos, Nicolas and Martinez, Jorge (2020): Corruption and instutitions: An analysis for the Colombian case. Forthcoming in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_126316.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper identifies the main determinants of errors in the allocation of spending by the Colombian Government. Using information from the Electronic Public Procurement System (SECOP), the determinants of the probability of an addition to a contract are identified. The errors of the government can be interpreted as an approximation of their corruption. The average income and educational level of a colombian department are found to directly influence the probability of an addition. Using the estimation of the binary choice models, the forecast error of an addition is estimated, it is found that public and civil works contracts have more forecast error, forming an ideal mechanism for thefts and accumulation of bribes. Our results show that predicting an addition can be done with high certainty.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Corruption and instutitions: An analysis for the Colombian case |
| English Title: | Corruption and instutitions: An analysis for the Colombian case |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Corruption Government Binary choice Economics Behavioral economics Economic development Microeconomics Econometrics |
| Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O16 - Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance |
| Item ID: | 126316 |
| Depositing User: | Alexander Cotte Poveda |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Feb 2026 11:38 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Feb 2026 11:38 |
| References: | Ades, A., Di Tella, R., 1999. Rents, competition, and corruption. Am. Econ. Rev. 89 (4), 982–993. Alexeev, M., Song, Y., 2013. Corruption and product market competition: an empirical investigation. J. Dev. Econ. 103, 154–166. Alfada, A., 2019. The destructive effect of corruption on economic growth in Indonesia: a threshold model. Heliyon 5 (10), e02649. Andersen, T.B., Bentzen, J., Dalgaard, C.J., Selaya, P., 2011. Does the Internet reduce corruption? Evidence from US states and across countries. World Bank Econ. Rev. 25 (3), 387–417. Barrett, E., Fazekas, M., 2020. Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: is corruption reduced or merely displaced? World Dev. 132, 105000. Berdiev, A.N., Goel, R.K., Saunoris, J.W., 2020. The path from ethnic inequality to development: the intermediary role of institutional quality. World Dev. 130, 104925. Bhagwati, J.N., 1982. Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. J. Polit. Econ. 90 (5), 988–1002. Chatterjee, I., Ray, R., 2009. Crime, Corruption and Institutions. Monash University, Department of Economics Discussion Paper, 20(09). Colonnelli, E., Prem, M., 2020. Corruption and firms. Available at SSRN 2931602. Cotte, A.C., 2015. Corruption, economic development, and insecurity in Colombia. In: Business Law and Ethics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, pp. 572–584. De Maria, W., 2008. Measurements and markets: deconstructing the corruption perception index. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. Dell’Anno, R., Teobaldelli, D., 2015. Keeping both corruption and the shadow economy in check: the role of decentralization. Int. Tax Publ. Finance 22 (1), 1–40. Dimant, E., Tosato, G., 2018. Causes and effects of corruption: what has past decade's empirical research taught us? A survey. J. Econ. Surv. 32 (2), 335–356. Dimant, E., Krieger, T., Redlin, M., 2015. A crook is a crook… but is he still a crook abroad? On the effect of immigration on destination-country corruption. Ger. Econ. Rev. 16 (4), 464–489. Ferraz, C., Finan, F., 2011. Electoral accountability and corruption: evidence from the audits of local governments. Am. Econ. Rev. 101 (4), 1274–1311. Frank, B., Lambsdorff, J.G., Boehm, F., 2011. Gender and corruption: lessons from laboratory corruption experiments. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 23 (1), 59–71. Goel, R.K., Nelson, M.A., 2010. Causes of corruption: history, geography and government. J. Pol. Model. 32 (4), 433–447. Gorodnichenko, Y., Peter, K.S., 2007. Public sector pay and corruption: measuring bribery from micro data. J. Publ. Econ. 91 (5-6), 963–991. Greene, W.H., 2003. Econometric Analysis, fourth ed.. International edition. Prentice, New Jersey. Gründler, K., Potrafke, N., 2019. Corruption and economic growth: new empirical evidence. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 60, 101810. Gutmann, J., Padovano, F., Voigt, S., 2020. Perception vs. experience: explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 101925. Haque, N.U., Sahay, R., 1996. Do government wage cuts close budget deficits? Costs of corruption. Staff Papers 43 (4), 754–778. Hardin, J.W., Hilbe, J.M., 2012. Generalized Linear Models and Extensions, third ed. College Station. Hoggard, S., 2004. Preventing corruption in Colombia: the need for an enhanced state- level approach. Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 21, 577. Kraay, A., Van Rijckeghem, C., 1995. Employment and Wages in the Public Sector: a Cross-Country Study. SSRN. International Monetary Fund. Krueger, A.O., 1974. The political economy of the rent-seeking society. Am. Econ. Rev. 64 (3), 291–303. Kumar, R., Indrayan, A., 2011. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr. 48 (4), 277–287. Kurer, O., 1993. Clientelism, corruption, and the allocation of resources. Publ. Choice 77 (2), 259–273. Langbein, L., Sanabria, P., 2013. The shape of corruption: Colombia as a case study.J. Dev. Stud. 49 (11), 1500–1513. Lima, M.S.M., Delen, D., 2020. Predicting and explaining corruption across countries: a machine learning approach. Govern. Inf. Q. 37 (1), 101407. Mauro, P., 1995. Corruption and growth. Q. J. Econ. 110 (3), 681–712. McClish, D.K., 1989. Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve. Med. Decis. Making 9 (3), 190–195. Mohamedbhai, G., 2020. The scourge of fraud and corruption in higher education. In: Corruption in Higher Education. Brill Sense, pp. 138–143. Myint, U., 2000. Corruption: causes, consequences and cures. Asia Pac. Dev. J. 7 (2), 33–58. Ojeka, S., Adegboye, A., Adegboye, K., Umukoro, O., Dahunsi, O., Ozordi, E., 2019. Corruption perception, institutional quality and performance of listed companies in Nigeria. Heliyon 5 (10), e02569. Owusu, E.K., Chan, A.P., Shan, M., 2019. Causal factors of corruption in construction project management: an overview. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25 (1), 1–31. Paldam, M., 2002. The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 18 (2), 215–240. Rose-Ackerman, S., 1975. The economics of corruption. J. Publ. Econ. 4 (2), 187–203. Sharafutdinova, G., 2010. What explains corruption perceptions? The dark side of political competition in Russia's regions. Comp. Polit. 42 (2), 147–166. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1993. Corruption. Q. J. Econ. 108 (3), 599–617. Tanzi, M.V., 1994. Corruption, Governmental Activities, and Markets (No. 94-99). International Monetary Fund. Tanzi, V., 1998. Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff Papers 45 (4), 559–594. Treisman, D., 2007. What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 10, 211–244 |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/126316 |

