Mirjalili, Seyed hossein (2025): بررسی تطبیقی مکتب های ساختارگرایی اقتصادی. Published in: Development Studies , Vol. 1, No. 4 (1 October 2025): pp. 163-176.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_126395.pdf Download (6MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article conducts a comparative examination of the main schools of economic structuralism: old structuralism, ECLAC neo-structuralism, and New Structural Economics. Methodologically, old structuralism is grounded in the analysis of macroeconomic structures and the internal constraints of accumulation processes in peripheral economies, recommending active state intervention to reform production and trade structures as the basis of development policy. In contrast, ECLAC neo-structuralism, by critiquing the static and dogmatic tendencies of old structuralism, adopts a dynamic and hybrid approach that highlights the interaction between domestic structures and the global economic order, while emphasizing the institutional and technological dimensions of competitiveness in the world economy. At the policy level, this approach stresses the alignment of development strategies with external constraints and internal capacities of each country. New Structural Economics, drawing on modern development economics and integrating the structuralists’ tradition with neoclassical insights, underscores the connection between dynamic comparative advantage, smart industrial policies, and the establishment of institutional and infrastructural foundations for structural transformation. Through a comparative-analytical perspective, this study elucidates the methodological bases of all three structuralist schools in relation to their policy implications and shows that the evolution of structuralism can be understood as a transition from a static and interventionist paradigm toward a dynamic, institution-based, and context-sensitive framework in development policy. The findings indicate that understanding the trajectory of structuralism is not only crucial for theoretical rethinking in development economics but also constitutes a methodological and practical necessity for designing effective policies in developing economies—particularly in addressing the challenges of globalization, structural dependency, and industrial transition.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | بررسی تطبیقی مکتب های ساختارگرایی اقتصادی |
| English Title: | A Comparative Study of Structural Schools in the Development Economics |
| Language: | Persian |
| Keywords: | Economic Structuralism, Neo-structuralism, New Structural Economics, Development Economics. |
| Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development |
| Item ID: | 126395 |
| Depositing User: | Prof. seyed hossein mirjalili |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Oct 2025 13:42 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Oct 2025 13:42 |
| References: | -Bielschowsky, Ricardo. “Sixty Years of ECLAC: Structuralism and Neo‐Structuralism.” CEPAL Review, No. 97 (2009), pp. 171-192. This gives both historical overview of ECLAC’s structuralism and its neo‐structuralist evolution. -Missio, Fabrício; Jayme Jr., Frederico G.; Oreiro, José Luís. “The structuralist tradition in economics: methodological and macroeconomics aspects.” Revista de Economia Política, 2015, 35(2), pp. 247-266. -Osvaldo Rodríguez (2006). “El estructuralismo latinoamericano” Mentioned in the “Structuralism-neo-structuralism and productive development” article. -Shirley Benavides Vindas.2016. “Structuralism - Neo-structuralism and the analysis of productive development,” Economía & Sociedad, Vol. 21, No. 50 (2016). -Neo-structuralism versus neo-liberalism in the 1990s, Osvaldo Sunkel and Gustavo Zuleta. CEPAL Review, Vol. 42, No. 5 (1990), pp. 35-51. - ECLAC’s edited volume: Neo-structuralism and Heterodox Currents in Latin America and the Caribbean at the Beginning of the XXI Century, edited by Alicia Bárcena and Antonio Prado (2015). -Lin, Justin Yifu. “New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development.” The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2011, pp. 193-221. -Lin, Justin Yifu. New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. Washington, D.C.: World Bank / World Bank Publications, 2012. -Lin, Justin Yifu. “New Structural Economics: The Third Generation of Development Economics.” Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3 (2019), pp. 279-286. -Lin, Justin Yifu. “Economic Development, Transition, and New Structural Economics.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Comparative Economics. Chapter. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/126395 |

