Understanding the Relationship between American Agricultural Labor and Machinery

Yang, Linge (2025): Understanding the Relationship between American Agricultural Labor and Machinery.

Abstract

This paper examines the substitutability between labor and machinery in U.S. agriculture using a translog cost function and county-level data from the 2002 and 2022 Censuses of Agriculture. We estimate own-price and cross-price elasticities, along with Allen-Uzawa and Morishima elasticities of substitution, to evaluate the evolving relationship between these inputs. Our results indicate that labor and machinery have been strong substitutes in the past two decades, reflecting the sector’s capacity to mechanize tasks traditionally performed by human labor. However, elasticity estimates reveal a notable decline in substitutability in the past twenty years, which might be explained by the onset of technological saturation. As basic agricultural tasks become increasingly automated, the remaining labor-intensive activities, such as fruit harvesting and livestock care, pose greater challenges to mechanization. We also observe a declining own-price elasticity of labor, indicating reduced responsiveness of labor demand to wage changes. A shift toward skilled labor and broader structural changes in the agricultural economy may drive this trend. Regional analysis highlights heterogeneity in substitution patterns, with some areas maintaining strong substitutability while others exhibit mixed or complementary relationships. These results carry important policy implications. High substitutability supports continued investment in mechanization and informs the design of subsidies and R&D funding. This paper also contributes to a deeper understanding of input dynamics in agricultural production and offers evidence-based guidance for innovation and labor policy in the sector.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Labor, mechanization, elasticity of substitution
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy

References

[1] Acemoglu, D. (2010). When Does Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation? Journal of Political Economy, 118 (6), 1037–1078. https://doi.org/10.1086/658160

[2] Akridge, J. T., & Hertel, T. W. (1986). Multiproduct Cost Relationships for Retail Fertilizer Plants. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (4), 928–938. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242139

[3] Allen, R. C. (2009). The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press.

[4] Arrow, K. J., Chenery, H. B., Minhas, B. S., & Solow, R. M. (1961). Capital-Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 43 (3), 225. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927286

[5] Babin, F. G., Willis, C. E., & Allen, P. G. (1982). Estimation of Substitution Possibilities between Water and Other Production Inputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64 (1), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241187

[6] Ball, V. E., & Chambers, R. G. (1982). An Economic Analysis of Technology in the Meat Products Industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64 (4), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240579

[7] Barnett, W. A., Lee, Y. W., & Wolfe, M. (1987). The global properties of the two minflex Laurent flexible functional forms. Journal of Econometrics, 36 (3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(87)90003-0

[8] Berndt, E. R., & Christensen, L. R. (1973). The translog function and the substitution of equipment, structures, and labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929–68. Journal of Econometrics, 1 (1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(73)90007-9

[9] Berndt, E. R., & Wood, D. O. (1975). Technology, Prices, and the Derived Demand for Energy. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 57 (3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923910

[10] Blackorby, C., & Russell, R. R. (1989). Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities). The American Economic Review, 79 (4), 882–888.

[11] Castillo, M., Simnitt, S., & Zahniser, S. (2025, September 12). Farm Labor. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-labor

[12] Caves, D. W., & Christensen, L. R. (1980). Global Properties of Flexible Functional Forms. The American Economic Review, 70 (3), 422–432.

[13] Chambers, R. G. (1988). Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach. Cambridge University Press.

[14] Chavas, J.-P., & Segerson, K. (1987). Stochastic specification and estimation of share equation systems. Journal of Econometrics, 35 (2–3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(87)90032-7

[15] Christensen, L. R., & Greene, W. H. (1976). Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation. Journal of Political Economy, 84 (4), 655–676.

[16] Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., & Lau, L. J. (1973). Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55 (1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927992

[17] Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., & Lau, L. J. (1975). Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions. The American Economic Review, 65 (3), 367–383.

[18] Diewert, W. E. (1971). An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function. Journal of Political Economy, 79 (3), 481–507.

[19] Diewert, W. E. (1973). Functional forms for profit and transformation functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 6 (3), 284–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(73)90051-3

[20] Diewert, W. E. (1974). Applications of Duality Theory. In Frontiers of Quantitative Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 106–176). North-Holland. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=883711

[21] Duvall, Z. (2019, July 10). Another Year of Farm Labor Shortages. American Farm Bureau Federation. https://www.fb.org/the-zipline/another-year-of-farm-labor-shortages

[22] Gallant, A. R. (1981). On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: The fourier flexible form. Journal of Econometrics, 15 (2), 211–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90115-9

[23] Gunders, D. (2012). Wasted: How America Is Losing Up to 40 Percent of Its Food from Farm to Fork to Landfill (No. August 12 IP:12-06-B). Natural Resources Defense Council. Retrieved from https://www.nrdc.org/resources/wasted-how-america-losing-40-percent-its-food-farm-fork-landfill

[24] Habakkuk, H. J. (1962). American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century: The Search for Labour-Saving Inventions. University Press.

[25] Hamilton, S. F., Richards, T. J., Shafran, A. P., & Vasilaky, K. N. (2022). Farm labor productivity and the impact of mechanization. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104 (4), 1435–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12273

[26] Hicks, J. (1932). The Theory of Wages (2nd ed.). Macmillan.

[27] Holtkamp, A., & Peter, O. (2025). H-2A Wages and Livestock Farm Labor Demand. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 50 (3), 487–507.

[28] Morishima, M. (1967). A Few Suggestions on the Theory of Elasticity (in Japanese). *Keizai Hyoron (Economic Review)*, 16, 144–150.

[29] Kostandini, G., Mykerezi, E., & Escalante, C. (2014). The impact of immigration enforcement on the U.S. farming sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96 (1), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat081

[30] Kuroda, Y. (1988). The Output Bias of Technological Change in Postwar Japanese Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70 (3), 663–673. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241505

[31] Martin, P. (2013). Immigration and farm labor: Policy options and consequences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95 (2), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas089

[32] McFadden, D. (1963). Constant Elasticity of Substitution Production Functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 30 (2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295804

[33] McKissick, J. C., & Kane, S. P. (2011). An evaluation of direct and indirect economic losses incurred by Georgia fruit and vegetable producers in spring 2011: A preliminary data analysis and summary working paper. University of Georgia. Retrieved from https: //openscholar.uga.edu/record/25794

[34] Ollinger, M., MacDonald, J. M., & Madison, M. (2005). Technological Change and Economies of Scale in U.S. Poultry Processing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87 (1), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00706.x

[35] Ray, S. C. (1982). A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1939–77. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64 (3), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240641

[36] Richards, T. J. (2018). Immigration reform and farm labor markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100 (4), 1050–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay027

[37] Rutledge, Z., Castillo, M., Richards, T. J., & Martin, P. (2025). H-2A adverse effect wage rates and U.S. farm wages. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12557

[38] Uzawa, H. (1962). Production Functions with Constant Elasticities of Substitution. The Review of Economic Studies, 29 (4), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296305