Loureiro, Paulo Roberto Amorim (2025): Sleeping with the Enemy: A General Equilibrium Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_126612.pdf Download (157kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper develops a general equilibrium model of domestic violence grounded in household bargaining and economic dependence. Inspired by the dynamics portrayed in the film *Sleeping with the Enemy* (1991), the model incorporates exit constraints, enforcement, and social norms as determinants of women’s decisions regarding labor participation and relationship continuity. The analysis shows how insufficient enforcement and limited outside opportunities trap victims in stable but inefficient equilibria characterized by violence and dependency. Comparative statics demonstrate that welfare policies such as shelters, transfers, and employment support shift equilibrium outcomes toward safety and self-sufficiency. The results highlight the role of public intervention in restoring efficiency and individual autonomy when private bargaining fails due to asymmetric power and coercion.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Sleeping with the Enemy: A General Equilibrium Approach |
| English Title: | Sleeping with the Enemy: A General Equilibrium Approach |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Domestic Violence; Economic Dependence; Household Bargaining; Enforcement; Welfare Policy; Gender Economics; Exit Constraints; Social Norms |
| Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law |
| Item ID: | 126612 |
| Depositing User: | PhD Paulo R.A. Loureiro |
| Date Deposited: | 04 Dec 2025 09:44 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Dec 2025 09:44 |
| References: | Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847–1859. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1847 Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394 Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of domestic violence. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344588 Bobonis, G. J., Castro, R., Menezes-Filho, N., & Rodriguez, C. (2013). Conditional cash transfers and domestic violence: Evidence from the Oportunidades program. World Bank Economic Review, 27(2), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhs020 Cerqueira, D., Bueno, S., & Lima, R. S. (2021). The cost of violence against women in Brazil: An empirical assessment. World Development, 139, 105267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105267 Cunha, C., & Paixão, R. (2022). Judicial enforcement and gender violence: Evidence from the Maria da Penha Law. Estudos Econômicos, 52(1), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-416152133rcr Erten, B., & Keskin, P. (2019). For better or for worse? Education and the prevalence of domestic violence in Turkey. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 64–105. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160279 Garcia-Moreno, L., Garcia, C., & Watts, C. (2018). Violence against women: Global and regional estimates. The Lancet, 392, 1555–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31467-2 Heise, L. L., Ellsberg, M., & Gottemoeller, M. (2011). Ending violence against women. Population Reference Bureau. Washington, DC. IPEA – Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. (2023). Atlas da Violência 2023. Brasília: IPEA e Fórum Brasileiro de Segurança Pública. https://www.ipea.gov.br/atlasviolencia Loureiro, P. R. A., Mendonça, M. J., & Moreira, T. B. S. (2024). Does domestic violence cause a wage gap among women? Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (RBPP), 14(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v14i3.8689 OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Gender equality and well-being in OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/gender-wellbeing-en Oliveira, R., & Prado, L. (2020). A dynamic model of domestic violence and female labor supply. Cadernos de Economia, 15(2), 45–70. Sant’Anna, A., & Brito, M. (2020). Spillover effects of domestic violence: Evidence from spatial econometrics in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 74(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20200015 Silva, P., & Diniz, T. (2021). Unemployment, alcohol consumption, and violence against women: A time-series approach. Economia Aplicada, 25(4), 563–585. https://doi.org/10.11606/1413-8050/ea2524 Tauchen, H., Witte, A. D., & Long, S. (1991). Domestic violence: A nonrandom affair. International Economic Review, 32(2), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526882 UN Women. (2022). The economic costs of violence against women. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. https://data.unwomen.org WHO – World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates 2018. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256 |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/126612 |

