Kikuchi, Tatsuru (2025): Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Difference-in-Differences: A Framework from Navier-Stokes Equation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_126716.pdf Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper develops a unified framework for identifying spatial and temporal boundaries of treatment effects in difference-in-differences designs. Starting from fundamental fluid dynamics equations (Navier-Stokes), we derive conditions under which treatment effects decay exponentially in space and time, enabling researchers to calculate explicit boundaries beyond which effects become undetectable. The framework encompasses both linear (pure diffusion) and nonlinear (advection-diffusion with chemical reactions) regimes, with testable scope conditions based on dimensionless numbers from physics (P\'eclet and Reynolds numbers). We demonstrate the framework's diagnostic capability using air pollution from coal-fired power plants. Analyzing 791 ground-based PM$_{2.5}$ monitors and 189,564 satellite-based NO$_2$ grid cells in the Western United States over 2019-2021, we find striking regional heterogeneity: within 100 km of coal plants, both pollutants show positive spatial decay (PM$_{2.5}$: $\kappa_s = 0.00200$, $d^* = 1,153$ km; NO$_2$: $\kappa_s = 0.00112$, $d^* = 2,062$ km), validating the framework. Beyond 100 km, negative decay parameters correctly signal that urban sources dominate and diffusion assumptions fail. Ground-level PM$_{2.5}$ decays approximately twice as fast as satellite column NO$_2$, consistent with atmospheric transport physics. The framework successfully diagnoses its own validity in four of eight analyzed regions, providing researchers with physics-based tools to assess whether their spatial difference-in-differences setting satisfies diffusion assumptions before applying the estimator. Our results demonstrate that rigorous boundary detection requires both theoretical derivation from first principles and empirical validation of underlying physical assumptions.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Difference-in-Differences: A Framework from Navier-Stokes Equation |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Difference-in-Differences, Spatial Spillovers, Treatment Effect Heterogeneity, Navier-Stokes Equations, Atmospheric Dispersion, Boundary Detection |
| Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes |
| Item ID: | 126716 |
| Depositing User: | Tatsuru Kikuchi |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Nov 2025 02:15 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Nov 2025 02:15 |
| References: | \begin{thebibliography}{99} \bibitem[Allcott(2015)]{allcott2015site} Allcott, H. (2015). \newblock Site selection bias in program evaluation. \newblock \emph{Quarterly Journal of Economics}, 130(3), 1117--1165. \bibitem[Angrist and Kolesár(2022)]{angrist2022empirical} Angrist, J. D. and Kolesár, M. (2022). \newblock One instrument to rule them all: The bias and coverage of just-ID IV. \newblock \emph{Journal of Econometrics}, forthcoming. \bibitem[Anselin(1988)]{anselin1988spatial} Anselin, L. (1988). \newblock \emph{Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models}. \newblock Springer. \bibitem[Apte et al.(2012)]{apte2012ambient} Apte, J. S., Marshall, J. D., Cohen, A. J., and Brauer, M. (2012). \newblock Addressing global mortality from ambient PM$_{2.5}$. \newblock \emph{Environmental Science \& Technology}, 46(13), 8057--8066. \bibitem[Athey and Imbens(2017)]{athey2017econometrics} Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W. (2017). \newblock The econometrics of randomized experiments. \newblock In \emph{Handbook of Economic Field Experiments}, volume 1, pages 73--140. Elsevier. \bibitem[Bey et al.(2001)]{bey2001global} Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., et al. (2001). \newblock Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. \newblock \emph{Journal of Geophysical Research}, 106(D19), 23073--23095. \bibitem[Busso et al.(2013)]{busso2013assessing} Busso, M., Gregory, J., and Kline, P. (2013). \newblock Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place based policy. \newblock \emph{American Economic Review}, 103(2), 897--947. \bibitem[Butts and Gardner(2023)]{butts2023difference} Butts, K. and Gardner, J. (2023). \newblock Difference-in-differences with spatial spillovers. \newblock Working paper. \bibitem[Byun and Schere(1999)]{byun1999science} Byun, D. W. and Schere, K. L. (1999). \newblock Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. \newblock \emph{Applied Mechanics Reviews}, 59(2), 51--77. \bibitem[Cimorelli et al.(2005)]{cimorelli2005aermod} Cimorelli, A. J., Perry, S. G., Venkatram, A., et al. (2005). \newblock AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. \newblock \emph{Journal of Applied Meteorology}, 44(5), 682--693. \bibitem[Clay et al.(2019)]{clay2019does} Clay, K., Jha, A., Muller, N. Z., and Walsh, R. (2019). \newblock Does leaded gasoline impact crime? Evidence from the Clean Air Act. \newblock Working paper. \bibitem[Colella et al.(2019)]{colella2019inference} Colella, F., Lalive, R., Sakalli, S. O., and Thoenig, M. (2019). \newblock Inference with arbitrary clustering. \newblock Working paper. \bibitem[Conley(1999)]{conley1999gmm} Conley, T. G. (1999). \newblock GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence. \newblock \emph{Journal of Econometrics}, 92(1), 1--45. \bibitem[Currie and Neidell(2005)]{currie2009does} Currie, J. and Neidell, M. (2005). \newblock Air pollution and infant health: What can we learn from California's recent experience? \newblock \emph{Quarterly Journal of Economics}, 120(3), 1003--1030. \bibitem[Currie et al.(2011)]{currie2011does} Currie, J., Davis, L., Greenstone, M., and Walker, R. (2011). \newblock Do housing prices reflect environmental health risks? Evidence from more than 1600 toxic plant openings and closings. \newblock \emph{American Economic Review}, 105(2), 678--709. \bibitem[Currie and Walker(2011)]{currie2015does} Currie, J. and Walker, R. (2011). \newblock Traffic congestion and infant health: Evidence from E-ZPass. \newblock \emph{American Economic Journal: Applied Economics}, 3(1), 65--90. \bibitem[Deaton(2010)]{deaton2010understanding} Deaton, A. (2010). \newblock Understanding the mechanisms of economic development. \newblock \emph{Journal of Economic Perspectives}, 24(3), 3--16. \bibitem[Dehejia(2005)]{dehejia2005practical} Dehejia, R. H. (2005). \newblock Practical propensity score matching: A reply to Smith and Todd. \newblock \emph{Journal of Econometrics}, 125(1-2), 355--364. \bibitem[DellaVigna and Linos(2022)]{dellavigna2022predicting} DellaVigna, S. and Linos, E. (2022). \newblock RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. \newblock \emph{Econometrica}, 90(1), 81--116. \bibitem[Deryugina et al.(2019)]{deryugina2019mortality} Deryugina, T., Heutel, G., Miller, N. H., Molitor, D., and Reif, J. (2019). \newblock The mortality and medical costs of air pollution: Evidence from changes in wind direction. \newblock \emph{American Economic Review}, 109(12), 4178--4219. \bibitem[Donaldson and Hornbeck(2016)]{donaldson2018railroads} Donaldson, D. and Hornbeck, R. (2016). \newblock Railroads and American economic growth: A market access approach. \newblock \emph{Quarterly Journal of Economics}, 131(2), 799--858. \bibitem[Drukker et al.(2013)]{drukker2013maximum} Drukker, D. M., Prucha, I. R., and Raciborski, R. (2013). \newblock Maximum likelihood and generalized spatial two-stage least-squares estimators for a spatial-autoregressive model with spatial-autoregressive disturbances. \newblock \emph{Stata Journal}, 13(2), 221--241. \bibitem[Duranton and Turner(2012)]{duranton2014roads} Duranton, G. and Turner, M. A. (2012). \newblock Urban growth and transportation. \newblock \emph{Review of Economic Studies}, 79(4), 1407--1440. \bibitem[Fowlie et al.(2012)]{fowlie2012emissions} Fowlie, M., Holland, S. P., and Mansur, E. T. (2012). \newblock What do emissions markets deliver and to whom? Evidence from Southern California's NO$_x$ trading program. \newblock \emph{American Economic Review}, 102(2), 965--993. \bibitem[Glaeser and Gottlieb(2008)]{glaeser2008growth} Glaeser, E. L. and Gottlieb, J. D. (2008). \newblock The economics of place-making policies. \newblock \emph{Brookings Papers on Economic Activity}, 2008(1), 155--239. \bibitem[Goodman-Bacon(2021)]{goodman2018no2} Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). \newblock Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. \newblock \emph{Journal of Econometrics}, 225(2), 254--277. \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1997)]{heckman1997matching} Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P. E. (1997). \newblock Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. \newblock \emph{Review of Economic Studies}, 64(4), 605--654. \bibitem[Imbens and Rubin(2015)]{imbens2015causal} Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B. (2015). \newblock \emph{Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences}. \newblock Cambridge University Press. \bibitem[Kelejian and Prucha(2010)]{kelejian2010specification} Kelejian, H. H. and Prucha, I. R. (2010). \newblock Specification and estimation of spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive and heteroskedastic disturbances. \newblock \emph{Journal of Econometrics}, 157(1), 53--67. \bibitem[Kikuchi(2024a)]{kikuchi2024unified} Kikuchi, T. (2024a). \newblock A unified framework for spatial and temporal treatment effect boundaries: Theory and identification. \newblock arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.00754. \bibitem[Kikuchi(2024b)]{kikuchi2024stochastic} Kikuchi, T. (2024b). \newblock Stochastic boundaries in spatial general equilibrium: A diffusion-based approach to causal inference with spillover effects. \newblock arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06594. \bibitem[Kline and Moretti(2014)]{kline2019place} Kline, P. and Moretti, E. (2014). \newblock Local economic development, agglomeration economies, and the big push: 100 years of evidence from the Tennessee Valley Authority. \newblock \emph{Quarterly Journal of Economics}, 129(1), 275--331. \bibitem[Knittel et al.(2016)]{knittel2016caution} Knittel, C. R., Miller, D. L., and Sanders, N. J. (2016). \newblock Caution, drivers! Children present: Traffic, pollution, and infant health. \newblock \emph{Review of Economics and Statistics}, 98(2), 350--366. \bibitem[LeSage and Pace(2009)]{lesage2009introduction} LeSage, J. and Pace, R. K. (2009). \newblock \emph{Introduction to Spatial Econometrics}. \newblock Chapman and Hall/CRC. \bibitem[Martin et al.(2019)]{martin2019high} Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., van Donkelaar, A., et al. (2019). \newblock No one knows which city has the highest concentration of fine particulate matter. \newblock \emph{Atmospheric Environment: X}, 3, 100040. \bibitem[Muller and Mendelsohn(2009)]{muller2011environmental} Muller, N. Z. and Mendelsohn, R. (2009). \newblock Efficient pollution regulation: Getting the prices right. \newblock \emph{American Economic Review}, 99(5), 1714--1739. \bibitem[van Donkelaar et al.(2016)]{van2017global} van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., et al. (2016). \newblock Global estimates of fine particulate matter using a combined geophysical-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. \newblock \emph{Environmental Science \& Technology}, 50(7), 3762--3772. \end{thebibliography} |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/126716 |

