Bell, Peter (2025): Comment on Raputsoane’s Analysis of Regional Differences in Governance of Mining Companies.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_126880.pdf Download (170kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Raputsoane (2025) analyzes governance standards for mining companies worldwide using a cross-sectional regression to estimate differences between South Africa and the rest of the world. The article starts with S&P Global Ratings’ Corporate Sustainability Assessment (CSA) score as a proxy for governance. It compares it to a series of company-specific parameters, including market capitalization, average share price over the prior year, return on equity, return on assets, a variable to reflect required disclosure, and a variable to reflect additional information provided by each company beyond legal requirements. The empirical results show that better governance is correlated with greater disclosure, but other variables do not show a statistically significant correlation with governance. The positive correlation between governance and market cap suggests larger companies are subject to greater scrutiny, but the estimate is not statistically significant. These results lead to valuable discussion about governance outside the mining firm, including government standards.
Commentary/Response Threads
-
Raputsoane, Leroi
Global mineral companies attributes and corporate governance. (deposited 09 Jan 2025 01:57)
- Bell, Peter Comment on Raputsoane’s Analysis of Regional Differences in Governance of Mining Companies. (deposited 19 Nov 2025 04:35) [Currently Displayed]

