Shortfalls in profitability: Internal Rate of Return re-estimation based on ex-ante indicators and ex-post deviations

Parra, Carlos (2025): Shortfalls in profitability: Internal Rate of Return re-estimation based on ex-ante indicators and ex-post deviations.

Abstract

Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is one of the main tools that public administrations have at their disposal to analyze the socio-economic convenience of infrastructure projects. However, the application of this methodology is often problematic due to the uncertainty surrounding the main variables and the optimistic bias of evaluators, which translates into ex-post deviations and the appearance of the so-called “white elephants” (i.e., projects with negative social profitability). Considering the internal rate of return (IRR) as a decision criterion to accept or reject a project, the contribution of this paper to the academic literature is the redefinition of the IRR in order to include an ex-ante indicator and ex-post deviations. The main advantages of this instrument are its simplicity, transparency, and comparability of results when detailed ex-ante data are not available, and applications span from policy to research. Firstly, it facilitates systematic ex-post reviews by administrations, providing a reasonably accurate estimate in a low-cost and transparent manner. Secondly, it enables the empirical testing of profitability in large samples of projects, which could extend our understanding of the overall validity of CBA and best practices for project appraisal.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cost-Benefit Analysis, ex-post evaluation, internal rate of return.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning

References

AIReF. (2020). Evaluación del gasto público 2019: Infraestructuras de Transporte. Autoridad Independiente de Responsabilidad Fiscal. Second Phase of the Spending Review. (in Spanish)

Asplund, D., & Eliasson, J. (2016). Does uncertainty make cost-benefit analyses pointless? Transportation Research Part A, 195 - 205.

Benitez, D., Estache, A., & Søreide, T. (2010). Dealing with Politics for Money and Power in Infrastructure. Policy Research Working Paper 5455, The World Bank.

Boardman, A. M. (1994). Learning from Ex -Ante/Ex-post cost-benefit comparisons: the Coquihalla highway example. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 28 ((2), pp. 69-84.), Vol. 28 (2), 69–84.

Bos, E. &. (2024). Towards a better comparison of ex-post and ex-ante BCA’s by decomposing potential causes of difference. Transport Policy, Vol 151, Pp 36 - 45.

Brealey, R., Myers, S., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Del Bo, C., & Florio, M. (2010). Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Rates of Return of Infrastructure Projects: Evidence from International Organizations. Transition Studies Review, Vol 17, ((3), Pp 587- 610), Vol. 17, Pp. 587-610.

Department for Transport. (2021). TAG: updated evidence for optimism bias uplifts. Department for Transport, UK.

European Commission. (2014). Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Brussels: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy, European Commission.

European Commission. (2021). Economic Appraisal Vademecum 2021-2027. General Principles and Sector Applications. Brussels: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy, European Commission.

Flyvbjerg, B., & Bester, D. (2021). The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 12 (3), 395-419.

Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M., & Buhl, S. (2002). Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, 3, 279 - 295.

Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M., & Buhl, S. (2006). Inaccuracy in Traffic Forecasts. Transport Reviews, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1-24., 1 - 24.

Ganuza, J., & Llobet, G. (2020). The Simple Economics of White Elephants. Mathematical Social Sciences, Vol. 106, 91-100.

Gómez-Lobo, A. (2012). Institutional Safeguards for Cost Benefit Analysis: Lessons from the Chilean National Investment System. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 3, Is. 1.

ITF. (2017). Ex-Post Assessment of Transport Investments and Policy Interventions. Paris: ITF Roundtable Reports, OECD Publishing.

Inter-American Development Bank. (2012). Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of IDB-Funded Projects. Washington D.C.: IDB-WP.

Levinson, D., & Wang, Y. (2023). The accuracy of benefit-cost analysis for transport projects supported by the Asian Development Bank. Asian Transport Studies, 9, Vol. 9.

Mackie, P., & Preston, J. (1998). Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal. Transport Policy, Vol. 5 , pp.1-7.

Ministère de l’Écologie, d. D. (2021). Bilan des bilans LOTI. Rapport nº 012979-01. (in French)

Nicolaisen, M. S., & Driscoll, P. A. (2014). Ex-Post Evaluations of Demand Forecast Accuracy: A Literature Review. Transport Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 4, 540–557.

Nicolaisen, M. S., & Driscoll, P. A. (2016). An International Review of Ex-Post Project Evaluation Schemes in the Transport Sector. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 18, Is. (1).

OECD. (2014a). Recommendation of the Council on Effective Public Investment Across Levels of Government. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

OECD. (2014b). Dataset on the challenges and applications of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) for the preliminary feasibility study of capital investments. Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Odeck, J., & Kjerkreit, A. (2019). The accuracy of benefit-cost analyses (BCAs) in transportation: An ex-post evaluation of road projects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120(Pp. 277-294), Vol. 120, pp. 277–294.

Setra - Service d'Études sur les Transports, les Routes et leurs Aménagements. (2011). Setra - Service d'Études sur les Transports, les Routes et leurs Aménagements. MEDDE (in French).

Sistema Nacional de Inversión Pública - SNIP. (2024). Anexo N° 11: Parámetros de Evaluación Social. Ministerio de Economia y Finanzas (MEF). (in Spanish)

The World Bank. (2010). Cost-benefit analysis in World Bank projects, IEG Fast Track Brief. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

The World Bank. (2020). Infrastructure Governance Assessment Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Välilä, T. (2024). Forecast Errors and Welfare Conclusions Based on the Flyvbjerg Database. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 1-16.

de Jong, G., Vignetti, S., & Pancotti, C. (2020). Ex-post evaluation of major infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 42, pp. 75–84.

de Rus, G. (2010). Introduction to Cost–Benefit Analysis: Looking for Reasonable Shortcuts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

de la Fuente, A., & de Rus, G. (2024). Notas sobre el Proyecto de Ley de Movilidad Sostenible. Fedea, Colección Apuntes no. 2024-10. (in Spanish)