Weighted Pro-Rata: Exploration of a Promising New Music Streaming Remuneration System

Gierens, Jakob (2026): Weighted Pro-Rata: Exploration of a Promising New Music Streaming Remuneration System.

Abstract

Despite driving the recent resurgence of music industry revenue, digital streaming platforms (DSPs) face persistent criticism over the fairness of their pro-rata royalty payout systems, sparking legislative initiatives in the EU, US, and UK. This article asks how much of the perceived unfairness in DSPs’ pro-rata payouts can be ascribed to platforms offering disparate types of music consumption without any organizational separation, and how the status quo could be improved. DSPs offer access to large libraries of records that users can browse and play from, as well as “programmed” listening features, e.g. editorial or algorithmic playlists. The latter channel constitutes 40% of Spotify streams by now, and pays at the same rate per stream as the former channel. Since DSPs pay by streams market share, boosting the streams of some artists via algorithmic or editorial promotion diminishes the payout for all others. I develop empirical and theoretical arguments for why paying every stream the same price is suboptimal, by presenting disconnects between the pure number of streams and consumers’ level of engagement with content. This suggests that under the pro-rata model, the payment distribution does not accurately reflect consumers’ preferences. I further show how a stream-source weighted pro-rata system aka active engagement model can increase the pay rate for active streams by up to 67% depending on the choice of the weighting factor, hereby diminishing the financial impact of platforms’ promotion choices and rewarding artists for creating music that consumers want to actively seek out.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Remuneration Policies; Music Streaming; Platforms; Music Industry; Fair Division
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z11 - Economics of the Arts and Literature

References

Aguiar, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2021). Platforms, power, and promotion: Evidence from Spotify playlists. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 69(3), 653–691, https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12263

Aguiar, L., Waldfogel, J., Waldfogel, S.B. (2021, July). Playlisting favorites: Measuring platform bias in the music industry (Working Paper No. 29017). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w29017.

Aguiar, L., Waldfogel, J., Zeijen, A. (2024, October). Platform power struggle: Spotify and the major record labels (Working Paper No. 33048). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w33048.

Alaei, S., Makhdoumi, A., Malekian, A., Pekeč, S. (2020). Revenue-sharing allocation strategies for two-sided media platforms: Pro-rata versus user-centric. (SSRN Electronic Journal)

Anderton, C., & Hannam, J. (2024). Pressing reset: Reimagining performer and songwriter revenues in the contemporary music industry. D. Arditi & R. Nolan (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of critical music industry studies (pp. 49–68). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Bergantiños, G., & Moreno-Ternero, J.D. (2025). Revenue sharing at music streaming platforms. Management Science, 71(10), 8319–8335, https://doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.2023.03830

Bourreau, M., Gensollen, M., Moreau, F., Waelbroeck, P. (2013). “selling less of more?” the impact of digitization on record companies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 37(3), 327–346, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-012-9184-4 Costas, J., & Vonderau, P. (2025). Vergütung im deutschen markt für musikstreaming: Abschlussbericht. https :// kulturstaatsminister .de / fileadmin/user _upload/Downloads/Kunst - _und _Kulturf%C3%B6rderung/ ForschunsgnetzwerkDigitaleKultur _Studie -Musikstreaming .pdf. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

Dimont, J. (2018). Royalty inequity: Why music streaming services should switch to a per-subscriber model. Hastings Law Journal, 69(2), 675–700

Duffett, M. (2018). Fan identities and practices in context: Dedicated to music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

European Parliament (17.01.2024). Resolution of 17 january on cultural diversity and the conditions for authors in the european music streaming market: 2023/2054(ini). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024 -0020_EN.html.

Falck, O., Fritsch, M., Heblich, S., Otto, A. (2015). Music in the air: Estimating the social return to cultural amenities. https://www .ifo.de/en/cesifo/ publications/2015/working-paper/music-air-estimating-social-return-cultural -amenities. (CESifo Working Paper No. 5183)

Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., Harrington, C. (2017). Fandom, second edition: Identities and communities in a mediated world. NYU Press.

Harms, F. (2025). Anzahl der verfügbaren tracks auf Spotify bis märz 2025. Statista, https://de .statista .com/statistik/daten/studie/378806/umfrage/anzahl -der -verfuegbaren-songs-auf-spotify/. (accessed: 2025-08-04)

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2021). Is music streaming bad for musicians? problems of evidence and argument. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3593–3615, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1461444820953541

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2022). Streaming’s effects on music culture: Old anxieties and new simplifications. Cultural Sociology, 16(1), 3–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 17499755211019974

House of Commons (2021). Economics of music streaming: Second report of session 2021-22. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/646/economics-of-music -streaming/publications/.

Independent Music Companies Association (2023). 10 steps to make the most of streaming. https://impalamusic.org/10-steps-to-reform-streaming -models/. (accessed: 2025-05-30)

International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (2025). Cisac global collections report 2025. https://www.cisac.org/cisac-global-collections -report-2025.

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2016). Consumer insight report 2016. https://ifpi.at/website2018/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ifpi-music -consumer-insight-report-2016.pdf.

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2017). Consumer insight report 2017. https://www.ifpi.org/downloads/Music-Consumer-Insight-Report -2017.pdf.

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2018). Consumer insight report 2018. https://www.ifpi.org/ifpi-releases-2018-music-consumer-insight -report/. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2019). Engaging with music 2019. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Music-Listening -2019-1.pdf. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2021). Engaging with music 2021. https://www.ifpi.org/ifpi-releases-engaging-with-music-2021/. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2022). Engaging with music 2022. https://www.ifpi.se/2022/11/17/ifpi-releases-engaging-with-music-2022 -report/. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2023). Engaging with music 2023. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/IFPI-Engaging-With -Music-2023_full-report.pdf. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2024). Ifpi global music report 2024. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/GMR_2024_State _of_the_Industry.pdf. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2025). Ifpi global music report 2025. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/GMR2025_SOTI .pdf. (accessed: 2025-08-08)

Jensen, F.J. (2024). Rethinking royalties: alternative payment systems on music streaming platforms. Journal of Cultural Economics, 48(3), 439–462, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10824-024-09507-z

Johnson, E.J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338-1339, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721

Kahin, B., & Varian, H.R. (2000). Versioning information goods. In Internet publishing and beyond: The economics of digital information and intellectual property (p. 190-202).

Khamis, S., & Wipfler, F. (2023). Streaming-Geld für ‘Geistermusiker’. https://www .tagesschau .de/wirtschaft/verbraucher/musikstreaming -potify -bezahlmodell -100.html[sic]. (accessed: 2025-05-23)

Lei, X. (2023). Pro-rata vs user-centric in the music streaming industry. Economics Letters, 226, 111111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111111

Meyn, J., Kandziora, M., Albers, S., Clement, M. (2023). Consequences of platforms’ remuneration models for digital content: initial evidence and a research agenda for streaming services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51(1), 114–131, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00875-6

Moreau, F., Wikström, P., Haampland, O., Johannessen, R. (2024). Alternative payment models in the music streaming market: A comparative approach based on stream-level data. Information Economics and Policy, 68, 101-103, https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101103

Nadler, J., & Johnson, H.C., Jr. (2021). Chairman nadler and ranking member jordan to Spotify on discovery mode 06.02.21. https://nadler.house.gov/news/ documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=394661. (accessed: 2025-06-24)

Pachali, M.J., & Datta, H. (2025). What drives demand for playlists on Spotify? Marketing Science, 44(1), 54–64, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0273

Page, W., & Safir, D. (2018). Money in, money out: Lessons from CMOs in allocating and distributing licensing revenue. (Music & Copyright Newsletter)

Page, W., & Safir, D. (2019). ‘user-centric’ revisited: The unintended consequences of royalty distribution. https://www.serci.org/congress_documents/2019/user _centric_revisited.pdf. (SERCI)

Pan, E.Y., & Wang, W. (2025). Elements of music that work to improve sleep, a narrative review. Frontiers in Sleep, 4, , https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2025 .1707162

Pedersen, R.R. (2020). A meta study of user-centric distribution for music streaming. København: Koda.

Pelly, L. (2025). Mood machine: The rise of Spotify and the costs of the perfect playlist. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Pro Musik e. V. (2023). Payment option transparency study. https :// paymentoptiontransparency .de/pdfs/de -DE/Payment%20Option%20Study .pdf. (accessed: 2025-08-15)

Rackowitz, L., & Haampland, O. (2025). The sound of salience: How platform design impacts consumption. Information Economics and Policy, 71, 101144, https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2025.101144

Rep. Tlaib, R. (2024). H.r.7763 - living wage for musicians act of 2024. https:// www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7763. (accessed: 2025-08-15)

Shiller, B., & Waldfogel, J. (2013). The challenge of revenue sharing with bundled pricing: An application to music. Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1155–1165, https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00442.x

Spotify (n.d.). Impressum / Transparenzinformation. https://www.spotify.com/de/ about-us/impressum/. (accessed: 2025-06-17)

Spotify (21.11.2023). Modernizing our royalty system to drive an additional $1 billion toward emerging and professional artists. https://artists.spotify.com/blog/ modernizing-our-royalty-system. (accessed: 2025-06-17)

The Competition and Markets Authority (2022). Music and streaming: Final report. https://assets .publishing .service .gov .uk/media/6384f43ee90e077898ccb48e/ Music_and_streaming_final_report.pdf. London. (accessed: 2025-08-15)

Tschmuck, P. (2024, October 14). The music streaming economy – part 18: “breakage” in the digital age. https://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2024/10/14/ the-music-streaming-economy-part-18-breakage-in-the-digital-age/. (accessed: 2025-08-26)

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2018). Form f-1 registration statement, Spotify technology, s.a. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ 1639920/000119312518063434/d494294df1.htm. (accessed: 2025-08-15)

Verband unabhängiger Musikunternehmer*innen e.V. (2022). Fair. Transparent. Streaming? – VUT-Forderungen zum Streaming der Zukunft. https://www.vut .de/fair-transparent-streaming-vut-forderungen-zum-streaming-der-zukunft/.

Walsh, M.J. (2024a). ‘I’m also slightly conscious of how much i’m listening to something’: Music streaming and the transformation of music listening. Media, Culture & Society, 46(4), 745–761, https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231219142

Walsh, M.J. (2024b). ‘It’s mostly an accompaniment to something’. M/C Journal, 27(2), , https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.3040

Walsh, M.J. (2024c). Streaming sounds: Musical listening in the digital age. London & New York: Routledge