Ayoki, Milton (2025): The stability clause paradox: How binding tax commitments in mining contracts undermine WAEMU/CEMAC coordination and lock in race-to-the-bottom dynamics.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_127203.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since 2003, the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) and Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) have implemented binding directives to harmonize mining tax regimes and eliminate fiscal competition. Yet, we observe a proliferation of mine-specific stability clauses—contractual provisions that freeze tax rates for 20-30 years—in response to these coordination efforts. Analyzing 47 mining contracts across 12 WAEMU and CEMAC countries (2010-2023), this paper identifies a Stability Clause Paradox: instruments designed to provide tax certainty have become the primary vehicle for undermining regional tax coordination. Our results show that mines with stability clauses face effective tax rates that are 18-23 percentage points lower than statutory rates, creating a dual fiscal regime that coordination cannot reach. Our theoretical model demonstrates that stability clauses act as commitment devices in tax competition, locking in race-to-the-bottom dynamics for decades. The paper provides the first empirical evidence that regional tax coordination in Africa is systematically circumvented through contractual tax stabilization, with immediate implications for WAEMU's ongoing mining code reforms and CEMAC investment policy reviews.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | The stability clause paradox: How binding tax commitments in mining contracts undermine WAEMU/CEMAC coordination and lock in race-to-the-bottom dynamics |
| English Title: | The stability clause paradox: How binding tax commitments in mining contracts undermine WAEMU/CEMAC coordination and lock in race-to-the-bottom dynamics |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Tax competition, regional integration, stability clauses, WAEMU, CEMAC, extractive sector, tax coordination, mining contracts |
| Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy |
| Item ID: | 127203 |
| Depositing User: | Milton AYOKI |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Jan 2026 05:12 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Jan 2026 05:13 |
| References: | African Mining Legislation Atlas. 2023. Mining Codes and Regulations. Available at: https://www.africanmininglaw.com/ (accessed November 14, 2025). African Union. 2018. African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Protocol on Investment. Addis Ababa: African Union Commission. Béraud, J., & Rota-Graziosi, G. 2020. "Tax Coordination in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU): Achievements and Challenges." FERDI Working Paper No. 216. Caselli, F., & Cunningham, T. 2009. "Leader Behavior and the Natural Resource Curse." Oxford Economic Papers, 61(4), 628–650. CEMAC. 2018. Programme de Réformes Économiques et Financières (PREF). Bangui: Commission de la CEMAC. Collier, P., & Venables, A. J. 2010. "International Rules for Trade in Natural Resources." WTO Working Paper ERSD-2010-06. Geneva: World Trade Organization. Commission de la CEMAC. 2009. Cadre communautaire de la législation minière dans l'espace CEMAC. Bangui: Commission de la CEMAC. Commission de l'UEMOA. 2003. Directive 02/2003/CM/UEMOA du 29 mai 2003 relative au code minier de l'UEMOA. Ouagadougou: Commission de l'UEMOA. Daniele, V., & de Santis, R. 2021. "Contractual Tax Stabilization as a Strategic Variable in Developing Countries." Journal of Development Economics, 150, 102626. Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. 2008. "Do Countries Compete over Corporate Tax Rates?" Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1210–1235. Dirac, M. 2024. "Institutional Lock-in and Adaptive Governance in International Environmental Agreements." Environmental and Resource Economics, 87(2), 345–372. Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. 1995. "Redistributive Politics and Economic Efficiency." American Political Science Review, 89(4), 856–866. European Court of Justice. 1964. Flaminio Costa v. ENEL. Case 6/64, ECR 585. Fondation pour les Études et Recherches sur le Développement International (FERDI). 2023. Fiscalité-Minière.fr: Database on Mining Taxation in Africa. Clermont-Ferrand: FERDI. Available at: https://fiscalite-miniere.fr/ (accessed November 14, 2025). Fuest, C., & Riedel, N. 2009. "Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance in Developing Countries: The Role of International Profit Shifting." Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper 09/27. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2019. Fiscal Analysis of Resource Industries (FARI) Methodology: User Guide. Washington, DC: IMF Fiscal Affairs Department. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2023a. West African Economic and Monetary Union: 2023 Article IV Consultation— Staff Report. IMF Country Report No. 23/115. Washington, DC: IMF. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2023b. Central African Economic and Monetary Community: 2023 Article IV Consultation— Staff Report. IMF Country Report No. 23/118. Washington, DC: IMF. International Monetary Fund (IMF). IMF eLibrary. Washington, DC: IMF. Available at: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/ (accessed November 14, 2025). Keen, M., & Mansour, M. 2010. "Revenue Mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges from Globalization." IMF Working Paper WP/10/157. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Keen, M., & Marchand, M. 1997. "Fiscal Competition and the Pattern of Public Spending." Journal of Public Economics, 66(1), 33–53. Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. 1977. "Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans." Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 473–491. Koné, S. 2021. "Mining Codes and Fiscal Revenues in Francophone Africa: The WAEMU Experience." Extractive Industries and Society, 8(4), 100956. Maton, J., & Béraud, J. 2023. "Extractive Sector Taxation and Regional Coordination in Africa: A FERDI Perspective." FERDI Policy Brief No. 143. Clermont-Ferrand: Fondation pour les Études et Recherches sur le Développement International. ResourceContracts.org. 2023. Extractive Contracts Repository. Washington, DC: Natural Resource Governance Institute & World Bank. Available at: https://www.resourcecontracts.org/ (accessed November 14, 2025). Schelling, T. C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. S&P Global Market Intelligence. 2023. Mines and Projects Database. New York: S&P Global Inc. Accessed via university VPN. Thomas, L. 2019. "Spatial Dependence in Mining Tax Incentives: Evidence from Africa." Resources Policy, 62, 471–483. UEMOA. 2015. Révision du Code Minier de l'UEMOA: Rapport d'impact. Ouagadougou: Commission de l'UEMOA. Van der Lugt, C., & Hamblin, K. 2017. "Harmonising Investment Incentives: The Andean Community Experience." OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 335. Paris: OECD Publishing. Wilson, J. D. 1986. "A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition." Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 296–315. World Bank. 2023. World Bank Commodity Price Outlook. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets (accessed November 14, 2025). World Bank Enterprise Surveys. 2023. Enterprise Survey Data for WAEMU and CEMAC Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/ (accessed November 14, 2025). Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. 1986. "Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods." Journal of Urban Economics, 19(3), 356–370. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/127203 |

