Souibgui, Moez and Ben Zina, Naceur (2025): Globalization and the Border Effect: A Geo-Economic Gravity Model of Trade Between the Maghreb and the European Union.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_127388.pdf Download (727kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the theoretical foundations and methodological challenges of assessing border effects in international trade. The border effect serves as an empirical tool to evaluate economic integration by analyzing trade flows and internal exchanges within a region or country. Using gravity models, which effectively capture the impact of economic size, distance, and trade agreements on bilateral trade, this study investigates the trade relationship between the Union of the Maghreb (UMA) and the European Union (EU) from 1995 to 2016. The findings indicate a significant border effect, with intra-Maghreb trade being 3.68 times higher than trade between the UMA and the EU, despite preferential agreements with Europe. Globalization has transformed the role of borders, yet they remain crucial in shaping trade and economic policies. While the Maghreb belongs to multiple regional organizations, its economic integration remains limited, reinforcing dependence on the EU. Additionally, security concerns, including migration and counterterrorism, increasingly influence trade relations. The study concludes that globalization does not eliminate borders but redefines them. Despite increased connectivity and trade liberalization, economic, political, and security factors continue to shape international trade dynamics, highlighting the enduring significance of borders in global economic relations.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Globalization and the Border Effect: A Geo-Economic Gravity Model of Trade Between the Maghreb and the European Union |
| English Title: | Globalization and the Border Effect: A Geo-Economic Gravity Model of Trade Between the Maghreb and the European Union |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Border effects, gravity model, international trade, globalization, trade flows |
| Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General |
| Item ID: | 127388 |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Moez Souibgui |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Jan 2026 09:32 |
| Last Modified: | 07 Jan 2026 09:32 |
| References: | Abozaied, S., Elzarka, S., & Abdelbary, I. (2025). Assessing Chinese–Egyptian bilateral trade dynamics under the One Belt One Road initiative: augmented gravity model approach. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American economic review, 69(1), 106-116. Baier, S. L., Kerr, A., & Yotov, Y. V. (2018). Gravity, distance, and international trade. In Handbook of international trade and transportation (pp. 15-78). Edward Elgar Publishing. Baier, S., & Standaert, S. (2020). Gravity models and empirical trade. In Oxford research encyclopedia of economics and finance. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The review of economics and statistics, 474-481. Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The review of economics and statistics, 143-153. Blyde, J., & Molina, D. (2015). Logistic infrastructure and the international location of fragmented production. Journal of International Economics, 95(2), 319-332. Cai, M. (2023). A calibrated gravity model of interregional trade. Spatial Economic Analysis, 18(1), 89-107. Capoani, L. (2023). Review of the gravity model: Origins and critical analysis of its theoretical development. SN Business & Economics, 3(5), 95. Capoani, L. (2024). The gravity equation in international trade: an overview of the introduction of gravity to the study of economics and its systematic barriers. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1-34. De Benedictis, L., & Taglioni, D. (2011). The gravity model in international trade (pp. 55-89). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. De Benedictis, L., & Taglioni, D. (2011). The gravity model in international trade (pp. 55-89). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Deardorff, A. V. (2007, June). The Ricardian Model. Research Seminar in Internat. Economics, the University of Michigan, School of Public Policy. Deardorff, A. V., & Stern, R. M. (1998). Measurement of nontariff barriers (Vol. 179). University of Michigan Press. Djelti, S., & Zapata-Barrero, R. (2024). Transnational Migrant Entrepreneurship Policies in the Maghreb Countries: Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Migrations in the Mediterranean, 403. Duenas, M., & Fagiolo, G. (2013). Modeling the international-trade network: a gravity approach. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 8, 155-178. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, 70(5), 1741-1779. Ebaidalla, E. M., & Ali, M. E. M. (2023). Assessing Intra-Arab Trade Integration and Potential: Evidence from the Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model. The International Trade Journal, 37(2), 221-239. Egger, H., & Habermeyer, S. (2022). How preferences shape the welfare and employment effects of trade. Review of World Economics, 158(3), 815-853. Evenett, S. J., & Keller, W. (2002). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of political economy, 110(2), 281-316. Frankel, J. A., & Romer, D. (2017). Does trade cause growth?. In Global trade (pp. 255-276). Routledge. Gaigné, C., & Gouel, C. (2022). Trade in agricultural and food products. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 6, 4845-4931. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J. E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index–revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14, 543-574. Hanafi, Z. (2010). Maghreb trade relations: evaluation and prospects (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University). Behar, A., & Freund, C. (2011). The trade performance of the Middle East and North Africa. World Bank. Jadhav, S., & Ghosh, I. (2024). Future prospects of the gravity model of trade: A bibliometric review (1993–2021). Foreign Trade Review, 59(1), 26-61. Kabir, M., Salim, R., & Al-Mawali, N. (2017). The gravity model and trade flows: Recent developments in econometric modeling and empirical evidence. Economic analysis and policy, 56, 60-71. Khader, B. (2015). Europe and the Maghreb 1957-2015. Rivista di Studi Politici Internazionali, 189-216. Khalfaoui, H., & Derbali, A. (2021). The determinants of foreign direct investment: what about the potential of the Arab Maghreb countries?. Journal of Investment Compliance, 22(4), 295-308. Leamer, E. E. (1995, January). The Heckscher-Ohlin model in theory and practice. Leitão, N. C. (2024). Gravity Model and International Trade: A Survey of the Literature. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 219. Mau, K. (2016). Export diversification and income differences reconsidered: The extensive product margin in theory and application. Review of World Economics, 152, 351-381. Melitz, J. (2007). North, South and distance in the gravity model. European Economic Review, 51(4), 971-991. Michaelides, P. G. (2025). The Gravity Equation. In 21 Equations that Shaped the World Economy: Understanding the Theory Behind the Equations (pp. 209-218). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. Mishra, A. K., Gadhia, J. N., Kubendran, N., & Sahoo, M. (2015). Trade flows between India and other BRICS countries: An empirical analysis using gravity model. Global Business Review, 16(1), 107-122. Mnasri, A., & Nechi, S. (2021). New nonlinear estimators of the gravity equation. Economic Modelling, 95, 192-202. Obradovic, L. (2012). The role of bilateral and regional trade agreements in the modernisation of taxation and revenue policy in developing economies. World Customs Journal, 6(2), 73-92. Ofori-Amoah, B. (2024). Perspectives on International Trade and Development. The African Continental Free Trade Area: Prospects, Problems and Challenges, 21-53. Pal, I., & Kar, S. (2021). Gravity Models in International Trade: An Exploration in Econo-Physics. South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, 10(1), 72-104. Romer, P. (1994). New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions. Journal of development Economics, 43(1), 5-38. Shankaranarayanan, S., & Johnson, J. P. (2022). Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what?. General Relativity and Gravitation, 54(5), 44. Siddiq, F., & D. Taylor, B. (2021). Tools of the trade? Assessing the progress of accessibility measures for planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(4), 497-511. Tsiapa, M., Kallioras, D., Petrakos, G., Rasvanis, E., Adamakou, M., Manetos, P., & Almazán-Gómez, M. Á. (2025). The geography of interregional FDI activity in Europe: uneven distribution and determinants. Spatial Economic Analysis, 1-20. Yotov, Y. V. (2022). On the role of domestic trade flows for estimating the gravity model of trade. Contemporary Economic Policy, 40(3), 526-540. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/127388 |

