An Empirical and Doctrinal Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Utilization Among Juris Doctor Students in Zamboanga City, Philippines

Rivero III, Roberto and Atilano, Lesley Ann and Moreno, Frede (2026): An Empirical and Doctrinal Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Utilization Among Juris Doctor Students in Zamboanga City, Philippines.

Abstract

This study investigates the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) among Juris Doctor (JD) students in Zamboanga City, Philippines, combining empirical and doctrinal analysis. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, synthesizing data from surveys (N=150), interviews, and focus group discussions, alongside doctrinal review of Philippine legal education norms and professional responsibility standards. Findings indicate that students frequently adopt AI for research, case summarization, drafting, and exam preparation, yet institutional guidance and ethical clarity remain limited. Only 34% of students consistently disclose AI use, and faculty report inconsistent policies across courses. Doctrinal analysis identifies three guiding principles for AI integration: transparency, competence, and alignment with assessment objectives. Applying these principles, the study proposes that law schools develop localized pedagogical frameworks, including AI literacy instruction, disclosure protocols, and assessment strategies that emphasize reasoning processes. The research underscores a regulatory vacuum in Philippine legal education regarding AI, highlighting the need for institution-specific policies to maintain doctrinal rigor, academic integrity, and professional competence. By situating empirical evidence within doctrinal and pedagogical frameworks, the study provides actionable recommendations for responsible AI adoption, contributing to the scholarship on technology integration in legal education in non-metropolitan, Global South contexts.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: artificial intelligence, legal education, Juris Doctor, pedagogy, ethical disclosure, Zamboanga City, Philippines
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I26 - Returns to Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I29 - Other; K - Law and Economics > K0 - General > K00 - General; K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K10 - General; K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K19 - Other; K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K30 - General; Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y5 - Further Reading (unclassified) > Y50 - Further Reading (unclassified); Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y8 - Related Disciplines > Y80 - Related Disciplines; Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General

References

Alimardani, A., 2024. Generative Artificial Intelligence vs. Law Students: An Empirical Study on Criminal Law Exam Performance. Law, Innovation and Technology, 16(2), pp.777–819, DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2024.2392932.

Andreeva, D. and Savova, G., 2024. Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Field: Law Students Perspective (preprint). arXiv.

Bittle, K. and El-Gayar, O., 2025. Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. 16(4), pp.296. Information, DOI: 10.3390/info16040296.

Johnston, H., Wells, R.F., Shanks, E.M., Boey, T. and Parsons, B.N., 2024. Student Perspectives on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Higher Education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, Article 2, DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4.

Mong, D.D. and Phan Thanh, H., 2024. Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Legal Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. 8(2), pp.13–27, DOI: 10.21511/kpm.08(2).2024.02.

Simmons, S. and Ward, E., 2025. Student Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing and Academic Integrity: Ethical Concerns, Academic Misconduct, and Use of Generative AI in Higher Education. AI Educ., 1(1), Article 2, DOI: 10.3390/aieduc1010002. Additional References

Bennett Moses, L. and McCurdy, M. (2022) ‘Artificial intelligence and the practice of law’, University of New South Wales Law Journal, 45(2), pp. 435–462. doi:10.53637/ZZRG7805.

Berman, D.H. (2023) ‘Educating lawyers in the age of generative AI’, Journal of Legal Education, 72(3), pp. 389–421. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4385001.

Casey, A.J. and Niblett, A. (2020) ‘The death of rules and standards’, Indiana Law Journal, 92(4), pp. 1401–1442. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3020947.

Choi, S.J., Gulati, M. and Posner, E.A. (2023) ‘Artificial intelligence and legal education’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 98(1), pp. 1–32. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4374280.

Davies, M. (2021) ‘Legal education and the ethics of technology’, Legal Ethics, 24(2), pp. 135–156. doi:10.1080/1460728X.2021.1937934.

Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Boud, D. and Hall, M. (2023) ‘Assessment redesign for artificial intelligence’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(6), pp. 847–860. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2136441.

Deeks, A. (2020) ‘High-tech international law’, Georgetown Law Journal, 108(6), pp. 1417–1472.

Duffy, M. and O’Brien, C. (2024) ‘Generative AI and legal skills training’, Legal Education Review, 33(1), pp. 45–70. doi:10.3316/informit.875634819903227.

Eaton, S.E. (2021) ‘Academic integrity in the post-plagiarism era’, Ethics & Education, 16(3), pp. 279–294. doi:10.1080/17449642.2021.1948980.

Flood, J. (2019) ‘Legal education in the global context’, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 26(3), pp. 241–259. doi:10.1080/09695958.2019.1685887.

Galloway, K. (2024) ‘Professional identity formation in law schools’, Legal Ethics, 27(1), pp. 1–22. doi:10.1080/1460728X.2023.2284501.

Garvey, J. (2022) ‘Technology competence as a professional duty’, Journal of the Legal Profession, 46(2), pp. 157–181. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4041732.

Henderson, W.D. (2020) ‘Legal education at the crossroads’, Journal of Legal Education, 69(4), pp. 699–726.

Katyal, S.K. (2019) ‘Private accountability in the age of artificial intelligence’, UCLA Law Review, 66(1), pp. 54–113.

Kim, J. (2023) ‘Student perceptions of AI-supported learning’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100103. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100103.

Latonero, M. (2020) ‘Governing artificial intelligence’, Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 22(1), pp. 1–37.

McGinnis, J.O. and Pearce, R.G. (2014) ‘The great disruption’, Fordham Law Review, 82(6), pp. 3041–3066.

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2020) ‘Legal education for a changing profession’, Stanford Law Review Online, 73, pp. 1–18.

Mollick, E. and Mollick, L. (2023) ‘Assigning AI: seven approaches for students’, Harvard Business Publishing Education, pp. 1–12. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4475995.

Pasquale, F. (2020) New laws of robotics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Remus, D. and Levy, F. (2017) ‘Can robots be lawyers?’, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30(3), pp. 501–558.

Richards, N.M. and King, J.H. (2014) ‘Three paradoxes of big data’, Stanford Law Review Online, 66, pp. 41–46.

Sullivan, W.M., Colby, A., Wegner, J.W., Bond, L. and Shulman, L.S. (2007) Educating lawyers: preparation for the profession of law. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Surden, H. (2019) ‘Artificial intelligence and law’, Georgia State University Law Review, 35(4), pp. 1305–1356.

Susskind, R. (2019) Tomorrow’s lawyers: an introduction to your future. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas, J. (2022) ‘Assessment validity in legal education’, The Law Teacher, 56(3), pp. 315–330. doi:10.1080/03069400.2021.1985164.

Twining, W. (2020) ‘Legal education and the future of the profession’, Law Quarterly Review, 136, pp. 207–225.

Vardi, M.Y. (2018) ‘The ethics of artificial intelligence’, Communications of the ACM, 61(10), pp. 5–7. doi:10.1145/3284639.

Zeleznikow, J. (2021) ‘Artificial intelligence and dispute resolution’, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 29(2), pp. 143–164. doi:10.1093/ijlit/eaab002.