Market for Lemons in Academia: Adverse Selection with Dynamic Human Capital Formation and Policy Lock-in

ALDASHEV, Alisher (2025): Market for Lemons in Academia: Adverse Selection with Dynamic Human Capital Formation and Policy Lock-in.

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamic theory of academic publishing in which evaluation metrics interact with researchers’ skill formation. Building on classic models of adverse selection and signaling, the analysis introduces endogenous human capital dynamics: researchers’ skills evolve as a function of their publication choices. Engagement with high-scrutiny journals enhances skills through learning-by-doing and referee feedback, while repeated publication in low-scrutiny outlets leads to skill depreciation. The model shows that when governing bodies fail to differentiate between high- and low-scrutiny publication outlets—treating all indexed outputs as equivalent—researchers optimally exert minimal effort, triggering a decline in aggregate research skills. Crucially, this process generates hysteresis: even if evaluation policies are later corrected, accumulated skill depreciation may prevent the re-emergence of a separating equilibrium. The theory is empirically motivated by a comparison of two research funding regimes in Kazakhstan—one imposing strict publication targets tied to indexed journals, and another without publication requirements—which generate markedly different publication patterns despite operating within the same academic environment. The framework highlights a previously unexplored channel through which metric-based evaluation systems can cause persistent damage to research capacity. It delivers clear policy implications: delayed reforms are costly, stronger differentiation across publication outlets may be required to restore quality, and increasing the cost of low-scrutiny publication can be as important as raising rewards for high-quality output. While grounded in a specific institutional setting, the model provides a general framework for understanding durable quality failure in research systems reliant on targeted publication metrics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: adverse selection, predatory publishing, human capital dynamics, lock-in effects
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Abalkina, A., Aquarius, R., Bik, E., Bimler, D., Bishop, D., Byrne, J., Cabanac, G., Day, A., Labbe, C. and N. Wise, “‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research”. Nature 637, 1047-1050 (2025).

Abalkina, A., “Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia-based paper mill”. Learned Publishing, 36, 689–702 (2023).

Akerlof, G., “The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500 (1970).

Bayanbayeva, A., “Strategic response or gaming the rankings? Unravelling the strategies behind global university rankings manipulation in the higher education context of Kazakhstan”. Higher Education (2025).

Carillo-Tudela, C. and Leo Kaas. “Worker mobility in a search model with adverse selection”. Journal of Economic Theory 160, 340-386 (2015).

Cox, A., Craig, R., and D. Tourish. “Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics”. Research Policy 47(5), 924-935 (2018).

Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Zaki, Y. and T. Rahwan. “Citation manipulation through citation mills and pre-print servers”. Scientific Reports 15, 5480 (2025).

Kocyigit, B. F., Zhaksylyk, A., Akyol, A. and M. Yessirkepov, “Characteristics of Retracted Publications From Kazakhstan: An Analysis Using the Retraction Watch Database”. Journal of Korean Medical Science Nov 27; vol 38(46): e390 (2023).

Marina, T. and I. Sterligov, “Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level”. Scientometrics 126, 5019–5077 (2021).

Mayr-Dorn, K, “Adverse selection, learning, and competitive search”. International Economic Review 64(1), 129-153 (2023).

Rivera, H. and J. A Texeira da Silva, “Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills”. Journal of Korean Medical Science Nov 28; vol 36(24): e165 (2021).

Sadowski, I. and L. Zamęcki, “Endogeny in measuring research excellence. In-house publishing and conflict of interests in Polish science evaluation”, Research Policy; vol 54; 105134 (2025).

Spence, M., “Job Market Signaling”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374 (1973).

Van Noorden, R., “How big is science’s fake-paper problem?” Nature 623, 466-467 (2023).

Zhao, K., Li, J. and H. Liang, “Reconfiguring power: a field analysis of China’s research evaluation reform”. Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-025-01480-6 (2025).

Zhou, Z., Lou, Y., Shen, Z. and M. Li, “Prevalence and Trends in Global Retractions Explored Through a Topic Lens”. Working Paper, arXiv 2025, Prevalence and Trends in Global Retractions Explored Through a Topic Lens