Huynh, Cong Minh (2026): Governance Quality and the Creative Economy: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Asian Countries.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_127769.pdf Download (340kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study investigates the multidimensional effects of governance quality on the development of the creative economy in 31 Asian countries over the period 2002–2023. Employing fixed-effects (FE) estimations and the System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM) to address endogeneity and dynamic panel bias, the findings reveal that all dimensions of governance quality exert positive and statistically significant effects on creative economy performance, although their magnitudes differ substantially across dimensions. Control of corruption, government effectiveness, and regulatory quality emerge as the most influential drivers, while rule of law, political stability, and voice and accountability also play important roles in expanding and sustaining creative economic activities. These results reaffirm the central importance of governance as an institutional foundation for creative economy development and highlight the complementarity - rather than substitutability - among governance pillars. By providing comprehensive quantitative evidence for Asia, this study contributes to the literature and offers policy-relevant insights for fostering innovation, strengthening commercialization capacity, and unlocking the creative potential of Asian economies.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Governance Quality and the Creative Economy: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Asian Countries |
| English Title: | Governance Quality and the Creative Economy: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of Asian Countries |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Governance quality, creative economy, control of corruption, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, Asia. |
| Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L82 - Entertainment ; Media O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z11 - Economics of the Arts and Literature |
| Item ID: | 127769 |
| Depositing User: | Dr Cong Minh Huynh |
| Date Deposited: | 09 Mar 2026 07:10 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Mar 2026 07:10 |
| References: | Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail, the Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Crown Business. Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995) Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Component Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-52. Belete, W. (2016). Policy modalities for support of Ethiopia’s creative industries. The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC), 19, 59-77. https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/21586 Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. Buti, M., & Szekely, I.P. (2021). The European Union post COVID-19: Preserving innovation's cutting edge and fostering social cohesion. Acta Oeconomica, 71(S1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2021.00033 Cerisola, S., & Panzera, E. (2021). Cultural and Creative Cities and Regional Economic Efficiency: Context Conditions as Catalyzers of Cultural Vibrancy and Creative Economy. Sustainability, 13(13), 7150. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137150 Cerisola, S., & Panzera, E. (2022). Cultural cities, urban economic growth, and regional development: The role of creativity and cosmopolitan identity. Papers in Regional Science, 101(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12654 Curry, J. T. (2025). Panel evidence and bibliometric insights on creative industries, human capital, and broadband in Latin America from 2010 to 2022. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2564304 D’Andrea, M. (2013). The rise of the creative class revisited. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 19(5), 643–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2012.730042 Flew, T., & Cunningham, S. (2013). Creative industries after the first decade of debate. In T. Flew (Ed.), Creative industries and urban development: Creative cities in the 21st century (pp. 68–78). Routledge. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books. Gordon, S.P. (2022). Freedom and Creativity. In: Developing Successful Schools (pp.185-209). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06916-1_9 Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5430. Leščinskij, R., Iurasova, O., & Šliogerienė, J. (2025). THE IMPACT OF CREATIVITY AS A FACTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ON GDP GROWTH IN EU COUNTRIES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-135-146 Li, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92–93, 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004 Nadeem, M.A., Jiao, Z., Nawaz, K., Younis, A. (2020). Impacts of voice and accountability upon innovation in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL and Maki Cointegration approaches. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(1), Article 6540837, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6540837 North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nurse, K. (2021). The digital creative economy and trade: Strategic options for developing countries. In World Trade Organization, Adapting to the Digital Trade Era: Challenges and Opportunities. WTO. OECD (2021). Economic and social impact of cultural and creative sectors. OECD Report. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/08/economic-and-social-impact-of-cultural-and-creative-sectors_6d8452e4/4d4e760f-en.pdf Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. Phung, T. D. ., Van, V. T. T. ., Thuong, T. T. H. ., & Ha, N. T. T. . (2019). Innovation and Economic Growth: The Contribution of Institutional Quality and Foreign Direct Investment. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(11), 1266–1278. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.911.1266.1278 Qamruzzaman, M., Tayachi, T., Mehta, A.M., & Ali, M.H. (2021). Do International Capital Flows, Institutional Quality Matter for Innovation Output: The Mediating Role of Economic Policy Uncertainty. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 141, 1-26. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131–165. Roodman, D. (2009). How to Doxtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9, 86-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106 Şanlı, D., Gülbay Yiğiteli, N., & Ergün Tatar, H. (2024). Do Economic Complexity Drivers Differ by Income Level? Insights From a Global Perspective. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241239412 Thiel, J. (2015). Creative cities and the reflexivity of the urban creative economy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415595105 Throsby, D. (2000). Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tran, Q. T. N., Nguyen, T. N. M., Le, L. K., Nguyen, G. H. T., Dinh, K. B., Le, T. M., & Trinh, T. M. (2025). The impact of macroeconomic factors on the creative economy: A comparative analysis of European countries and Asian countries. Journal of International Economics and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEM-05-2025-0037 UNCTAD. (2021). Digital economy report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2021_en.pdf UNCTAD. (2023). Advancing the measurement of the creative economy: A revised framework for creative industries and trade. United Nations publication. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213589229 UNCTAD. (2024). Creative economy outlook 2024. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditctsce2024d2_en.pdf UNCTAD. (2025). Creative Economy Statistics Database. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/creative-economy-programme/statistics Usman, J. ., A. Mappasere, F. ., & Rosdianti Razak, A. . (2024). Dynamic Governance and Creative Industrial Resilience Post-Covid-19 Pandemic. KnE Social Sciences, 9(7), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i7.15472 Van, V. T. T., Ha, N. T. T., Quyen, P. G., Anh, L. T. H., & Loi, D. T. (2020). The Relationship between Public Debt, Budget Deficit, and Sustainable Economic Development in Developing Countries: The Role of Corruption Control. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 21(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.21.1.5033 World Bank. (2024a). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank. (2024b). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. Yusuf, S., & Nabeshima, K. (2005). Creative industries in East Asia. Cities, 22(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.001 Zhao, K., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020). Exploring the Complexity of Location Choices of the Creative Class in Europe: Evidence from the EU Labor Force Survey 1995–2010. Sustainability, 12(4), 1687. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041687 |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/127769 |

