From Assets to Liabilities: Applied Net Present Value Profiles in Resource Project Failure and Rescue

Bell, Peter (2026): From Assets to Liabilities: Applied Net Present Value Profiles in Resource Project Failure and Rescue.

Abstract

Governments around the world increasingly acquire, rescue, or inherit capital-intensive projects that private actors are unable or unwilling to complete, operate, or remediate. These interventions are often framed as exceptional policy failures or discretionary rescues. This paper argues instead that such outcomes reflect a structural feature of capital-intensive projects: long-lived obligations associated with environmental risk, site-specific assets, and public safety cannot be extinguished through market exit alone. Building on the concept of forward-looking project valuation, the paper develops a complementary institutional framework that focuses on the costs and constraints of state operation after private exit has occurred. The analysis shifts attention from project-level profitability to institutional capacity, emphasizing that state ownership entails the assumption of complex operational, regulatory, and governance responsibilities that generate real economic costs over time. These institutional costs are endogenous, state-contingent, and often amplified under conditions of deep uncertainty and project failure. Using stylized examples drawn from resource extraction, infrastructure, and environmental remediation, the paper shows how projects may transition from productive assets to pure liabilities, and why governments frequently become residual claimants by necessity rather than by choice. The framework highlights the intergenerational consequences of deferred remediation and underinvestment in institutional capacity, and reframes state intervention as a response to persistent project-level obligations rather than as an ideological departure from market governance. The contribution of the paper is conceptual rather than prescriptive. It does not propose optimal ownership structures or regulatory instruments. Instead, it provides a structured way to analyze the economic significance of institutional capacity when governments assume responsibility for capital-intensive projects whose liabilities outlive private profitability.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: State intervention, Institutional capacity, Capital-intensive projects, Project failure, Environmental remediation, State-owned enterprises, Long-tail risk, Intergenerational equity, Infrastructure governance, Resource extraction
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

Arrow, K. J., & Fisher, A. C. (1974). Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883074

Bell, P. (2017). Introducing the net present value profile. MPRA Paper No. 79764. University Library of Munich.

Bell, P. (2018a). Application of the net present value profile to mining project valuation. MPRA Paper No. 81197. University Library of Munich.

Bell, P. (2018b). Example of a Rising NPV Profile for a Mining Project. MPRA Paper No. 81353. University Library of Munich.

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of corporate finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560

Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press.

Estache, A., & Wren-Lewis, L. (2011). Toward a theory of regulation for developing countries: Following Jean-Jacques Laffont’s lead. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), 729–770. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.3.729

Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. PM World Journal, 3(2), 1–10.

Hart, O., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1127–1161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555448

Helm, D. (2015). Natural capital: Valuing the planet. Yale University Press.

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.

HM Treasury. (2018). The Green Book: Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. UK Government.

Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/260580

Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), 321–389. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.2.321

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2015). Public governance of infrastructure investment: Turning principles into practice. OECD Publishing.

Pindyck, R. S. (2007). Uncertainty in environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem002

Pindyck, R. S. (2013). Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(3), 860–872. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.860

Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press.

Solow, R. M. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296370

Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Markets, market failures, and development. American Economic Review, 79(2), 197–203.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. OECD.

Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.1

Weitzman, M. L. (2011). Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req006

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1999). Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspective. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15(1), 306–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.306