Empowering entrepreneurial education using undergraduate dissertations in business management and entrepreneurship: a five-year study (2012-2016).

Rodríguez, A. and Souto, Jaime E. (2019): Empowering entrepreneurial education using undergraduate dissertations in business management and entrepreneurship: a five-year study (2012-2016). Published in: Education and Training , Vol. 61, No. 2 (5 March 2019): pp. 255-271.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the discussion about entrepreneurship education through Undergraduate Dissertations (UDs). In order to achieve this objective, this paper addresses the problems detected in the degree subject Undergraduate Dissertation (UD) –which entails the creation of a business plan– and the proposal of improvements in the teaching-learning process of this subject. Design/methodology/approach: Qualitative and quantitative analysis are used. First, the paper reports the problems that occurred during two academic years (2012-2013 and 2013-2014), as well as the solutions to these problems, in the two academic years that followed (2014-2015 and 2015-2016). Second, the improvements achieved are analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, based on data drawn from the records and a survey conducted in 2012-2013 (174 responses), and in 2015-2016 (184 responses). Findings: The results outline the positive effects on students’ learning outcomes and academic excellence, a three-stage assessment process, the strengthening of the coordination and supervision systems, and the enhancing of entrepreneurial spirit among graduates, with a UD connected to a business incubator. Practical implications: The authors describe the design and implementation of a UD that provides a major step in the students' entrepreneurial education, emerging, not only, as an opportunity to train and connect skills and knowledge learned about the starting a new venture, but also as a practical experience of entrepreneurship; a first step that introduces the student to entrepreneurship. Originality/value: There are very few examples of concrete subject designs that have undergone in-depth, longitudinal research, focusing on entrepreneurship. Prior research has focused on entrepreneurship primarily as a subject, forgetting the great utility of the UD as active training tool. Thus, this article breaks new ground by highlighting the role of the UD in entrepreneurial education. In this regard, the UD allows the student to be guided and to actually engage in the real-world practice of entrepreneurship. Specifically, it encourages them to apply their academic knowledge of the field in the context of creating a new business. Moreover, by creating a business plan, students are applying the knowledge and skills learned in the subject of entrepreneurship with other spheres of knowledge and skills.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: undergraduate dissertation, entrepreneurship education, business training, improvement plans, business plan, economic and financial dossier
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics; L - Industrial Organization > L0 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M13 - New Firms ; Startups; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Annetts, S., Jones, U. and Deursen, R. V. (2013). An innovative review of an undergraduate dissertation double marking policy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50 (3), pp. 308-317.

Armstrong, M. and Shanker, V. (1983). The supervision of undergraduate research: student perceptions of the supervisor role. Studies in Higher Education, 8 (2), pp. 177-183.

Armstrong, S. J., Allinson, C. W. and Hayes, J. (2004). The effects of cognitive style on research supervision: A study of student-supervisor dyads in management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3 (1), pp. 41-63.

Ashwin, P., Abbas, A. and McLean, M. (2017). How does completing a dissertation transform undergraduate students’ understandings of disciplinary knowledge?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42 (4), pp. 517-530.

Audretsch, D. B. and Link, A. N. (2017). Universities and the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Edward Elgar Publishing, Unites States.

Balla, J. and Boyle, P. (1994). Assessment of student performance: a framework for improving practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 19 (1), pp. 17-28.

Béchard, J. P. and Grégoire, D. (2007). Archetypes of pedagogical innovation for entrepreneurship education: Model and illustrations. in A. Fayolle (Ed.). Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education vol. 1, pp. 261–284, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.

Blenker, P., Trolle Elmholdt, S., Hedeboe Frederiksen, S., Korsgaard, S. and Wagner, K. (2014). Methods in entrepreneurship education research: a review and integrative framework. Education+Training, 56 (8/9), pp. 697-715.

Boud, D. and Costley, C. (2007). From project supervision to advising: new conceptions of the practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44 (2), pp. 119-130.

Burrows, K. and Wragg, N. (2013). Introducing enterprise-research into the practical aspects of introducing innovative enterprise schemes as extra curricula activities in higher education. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 3 (3), pp. 168–179.

Calvert, B. and Casey, B. (2004). Supporting and assessing dissertations and practical projects in media studies degrees: towards collaborative learning. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 3 (1), pp. 47-60.

Carbery, A and Hegarty, N. (2011). Introducing problem-based learning into one-shot information literacy instruction at Waterford Institute of Technology Libraries. SCONUL Focus, 53, pp. 30-33.

Cook, M. C. (1980). The role of the academic supervisor for undergraduate dissertations in science and science-related subjects. Studies in Higher Education, 5 (2), pp. 173-185.

De Kleijn, R. A., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M. and Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: exploring expert thesis supervisors' practical knowledge. Higher Education Research & Development, 34 (1), pp. 117-130.

Del Río, M. L., Díaz-Vázquez, R. and Maside Sanfiz, J. M. (2017). Satisfaction with the supervision of undergraduate dissertations. Active Learning in Higher Education, published online: July 23, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417721365.

Derounian, J. (2011). Shall we dance? The importance of staff-student relationships to undergraduate dissertation preparation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12 (2), pp. 91-100.

Engström, H. (2015). A model for conducting and assessing interdisciplinary undergraduate dissertations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40 (5), pp. 725-739.

Fayolle, A., Tavakoli, M., Le Pontois, S., Loi, M. and Tixier, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship education effectiveness: What we can learn from education and organisation studies, in International Enterprise Education, pp. 69-91, Routledge, London.

Feather, D., Anchor, J. R. and Cowton, C. J. (2014). Supervisors' perceptions of the value of the undergraduate dissertation. The International Journal of Management Education, 12 (1), pp. 14-21.

Fiet, J. O. (2001). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (1), pp. 1-24.

Galvão, A., Marques, C. S. and Marques, C. P. (2018). Antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among students in vocational training programmes. Education + Training, 60 (7)/8, pp. 719-734.

Greenbank, P., Penketh, C., SChofield, M. and Turjansky, T. (2008). The undergraduate Dissertation: most likely you go your way and I’ll go mine. The International Journal for Quality and Standards, 3 (22), pp. 1-24.

Greenbank, P, and Penketh, C. (2009). Student autonomy and reflections on researching and writing the undergraduate dissertation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33 (4), pp. 463-72.

Gunn, V. (2010). Enhancing research-teaching linkages as a way to improve the development of employability attributes. Quality Assurance Agency, Scotland.

Hayter, C. S., Nelson, A. J., Zayed, S. and O’Connor, A. C. (2018). Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, pp. 1-44 (to appear).

Hand, L. and Clewes, D. (2000). Marking the difference: an investigation of the criteria used for assessing undergraduate dissertations in a business school. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, pp. 5-21.

Harris, D. and Bell, C. (1994). Evaluating Assessing for Learning. Kogan-Page, London.

Healey, M., Lannin, L., Stibbe, A. and Derounian, J. (2013). Developing and enhancing undergraduate final-year projects and dissertations. Higher Education Academy, York.

Hernandez-Leo, D., Oliver, V.M., Camps, I., Clarisó, R., Monés, A.M., Galindo, M.J. and Melero, J. (2013). Implementación de buenas prácticas en los Trabajos Fin de Grado [Implementation of good practices in the Undergraduates Dissertations]. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11, pp. 269-278.

Higgins, D., Refai, D. and Keita, D. (2018). Focus point: the need for alternative insight into the entrepreneurial education paradigm. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, pp. 1-18.

Hindle, K. (2007). Teaching entrepreneurship at university: from the wrong building to the right philosophy. Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education, 1, pp. 104-126.

Jones, P., Pickernell, D., Fisher, R. and Netana, C. (2017). A tale of two universities: graduates perceived value of entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training, 59 (7/8), pp. 689-705.

Kirkwood, J., Dwyer, K. and Gray, B. (2014). Students’ reflections on the value of an entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Management Education, 12 (3), pp. 307–316.

Knight, R. A. and Botting, N. (2016). Organising undergraduate research projects: student-led and academic-led models. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8 (4), pp. 455-468.

Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (5), pp. 577-597.

Löbler, H. (2006). Learning entrepreneurship from a constructivist perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18 (1), pp. 19–38.

McMurray, I., Rafferty, C., Sutton, C. and Patel, S. (2017). Using dissertation projects to facilitate transitions to university and employment: an exploratory case study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41 (3), pp. 273-285.

Malcolm, M. (2012). Examining the implications of learner and supervisor perceptions of undergraduate dissertation research in business and management. Teaching in Higher Education, 17 (5), pp. 565-576.

Mann, H.B. and Whitney, D.R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, pp. 50-60.

Marzocchi, C., Kitagawa, F. and Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2018). Evolving missions and university entrepreneurship: academic spin-offs and graduate start-ups in the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, pp. 1-22.

Mason, J. and Siqueira, A. C. O. (2014). Addressing the challenges of future entrepreneurship education: an assessment of textbooks for teaching entrepreneurship, in Innovative pathways for university entrepreneurship in the 21st century, 24, pp. 41-64, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Mateo, J., Escofet, A., Martínez‐Olmo, F., Ventura, J. and Vlachopoulos, D. (2012a). Evaluation Tools in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA): an assessment for evaluating the competences of the Final Year Project in the social sciences. European Journal of Education, 47 (3), pp. 435-447.

Mateo, J., Escofet, A., Martínez, F., Ventura, J. and Vlachopoulos, D. (2012b). The Final Year Project (FYP), in social sciences: Establishment of its associated competences and evaluation standards. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38 (1), pp. 28-34.

Matlay, H. (2017). Entrepreneurial Learning: New Perspectives in Research, Education and Practice. Education+Training, 59 (7/8), pp. 907-912.

McLean, M., Abbas, A. and Ashwin, P. (2017). Quality in Undergraduate Education: How Powerful Knowledge Disrupts Inequality. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N. and Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16 (2), pp. 277-299.

Pathirage, C., Haigh, R., Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D. (2007). Enhancing the quality and consistency of undergraduate dissertation assessment: A case study, Quality Assurance in Education, 15 (3), pp. 271-286.

Parsons, T. and Knight, P.G. (2015). How to do your dissertation in geography and related disciplines. Routledge, London.

Pepper, D., Webster, F. and Jenkins, A. (2001). Benchmarking in Geography: Some implications for assessing dissertations in the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 25 (1), pp. 23-35.

Rae, D. and Wang, C. L. (Eds.). (2015). Entrepreneurial learning: New perspectives in research, education and practice. Routledge, New York

Rand, J. (2016). Researching undergraduate social science research. Teaching in Higher Education, 21 (7), pp. 773-789.

Refai, D., Klapper, R. G. and Thompson, J. (2015). Economic and financial dossier. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21 (3), pp. 316-337

Reguant, M., Martínez-Olmo, F. and Contreras-Higuera, W. (2018). Supervisors’ perceptions of research competencies in the final-year project. Educational Research, 60 (1), pp. 113-129.

Rich, M. (2010). Embedding reflective practice in undergraduate business and management dissertations. International Journal of Management Education, 9 (1), pp. 57-66.

Rideout, E. C. and Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51 (3), pp. 329-351.

Roberts, L. D. and Seaman, K. (2018). Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators. International Journal for Academic Development, 23 (1), pp. 28-40.

Royal Decree 1393/2007 (2007). of october 29, which establishes the organization of official university education, State Official Newsletter, October 30, 2007, 260, pp. 44.037-44.048.

Royal Decree 861/2010 (2010). of july 2, which modifies the royal decree 1393/2007, of October 29, which establishes the organization of official university education, State Official Newsletter, July 3, 2010, 161, pp. 58.454-58.468.

Rowley, J. and Slack, F. (2004). What is the future for undergraduate dissertations?. Education + Training, 46 (4), pp. 176-181.

Sánchez-Fernández, P. (2013). Trabajo Fin de Grado en Administración y Dirección de Empresas (ADE): De la teoría a la experiencia de la Facultad de CC. Empresariales y Turismo del campus de Ourense, Universidad de Vigo [Undergraduate Dissertation in Business Administration and Management (ADE): From the theory to the experience of the Faculty of CC. Business and Tourism of the Ourense campus, Vigo University]. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11 (3), pp. 461-481.

Saunders, M. and Davis, S., (1998). The use of assessment criteria to ensure consistency of marking. Quality Assurance in Education, 6 (3), pp. 162-171.

Serrano-Gallardo, P., Martínez-Martín, M. L. and Martínez-Marcos, M. (2017). Factores que determinan la evaluación del trabajo fin de grado. Un análisis multinivel [Factors that determine the evaluation of Undergraduate Dissertation. A multilevel Analysis]. Educación Médica, In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.05.001.

Shadforth, T. and Harvey, B. (2004). The undergraduate dissertation: Subject-centred or student-centred. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2 (2), pp. 145-152.

Shepherd, D. A. (2004). Educating entrepreneurship students about emotion and learning from failure. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3 (3), pp.274–287.

Smith, S., Smith, C., Taylor-Smith, E. and Fotheringham, J. (2017). Towards graduate employment: exploring student identity through a university-wide employability project. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, pp. 1-13.

Snavely, L.L. and Wright, C.A. (2003). Research portfolio use in undergraduate honors education: Assessment tool and model for future work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29 (5), pp. 298-303.

Solomon, G. T. and Fernald Jr, L. W. (1991). Trends in small business management and entrepreneurship education in the United States. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15 (3), pp. 25-40.

Solomon, G. T., Weaver, K. M., and Fernald, L.W. (1994). Pedagogical methods of teaching entrepreneurship: a historical perspective. Gaming and Simulation, 25 (3), pp. 67-79.

Stefani, L. A. J., Tariq, V. N., Heylings, D. J. A. and Butcher, A. C. (1997). A comparison of tutor and student conceptions of undergraduate research project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22 (3), pp. 271-288.

Todd, M., Bannister, P. and Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: perceptions and experiences of final‐year social science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (3), pp. 335-355.

Todd, M. J., Smith, K. and Bannister, P. (2006). Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (2), pp. 161-173.

Tounés, A. Lassas-Clerc, N. and Fayolle, A. (2014). Perceived entrepreneurial competences tested by business plan pedagogies. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 21 (4), pp. 541-557.

Universidad Europea, (2018). Hub Emprende, (Accesed: 21-09-2018). Available in https://alumni.universidadeuropea.es/desarrollo-profesional/entrepreneurship.

Vera, J. and Briones, E. (2015). Students’ perspectives on the processes of supervision and assessment of undergraduate dissertations. Culture and Education, 27 (4), pp. 726-765.

Volkmann, C. K. and Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Introduction: The Mandate for Entrepreneurship Education, in Entrepreneurship Education at Universities, 37, pp. 1-10, Springer, Cham.

Webster, F., Pepper, D. and Jenkins, A. (2000). Assessing the undergraduate dissertation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (1), pp. 71-80.

Weber, R. (2012). Evaluating Entrepreneurship Education. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Munich.

Wenger, K. (2014). Problem-based learning and information literacy: a natural partnership. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research and Practice, 2 (2), pp. 142-154.

Wright, M., Siegel, D. S. and Mustar, P. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42 (4), pp. 909-922.

Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics, 1, pp. 80-83.

Wood, L. N. and Breyer, Y. A. (2017). Success in Higher Education, in Success in Higher Education, pp. 1-19, Springer, Singapore.