Where geopolitical risk binds: Stockpiling and AI as complementary strategies for mitigating supply chain risk in critical minerals

Vespignani, Joaquin L. and Smyth, Russell and Saadaoui, Jamel and Wang, Yitian (2026): Where geopolitical risk binds: Stockpiling and AI as complementary strategies for mitigating supply chain risk in critical minerals.

Abstract

We develop novel, stage-specific, geopolitical risk indicators to examine how geopolitical risk is distributed across the supply-chain for lithium and copper, two minerals which are vital for low-carbon technologies. We find that refining is the geopolitical bottleneck for both minerals, reflecting that refining capacity is highly concentrated in China. We examine refining diversification, strategic stockpiling, and AI-driven productivity gains as complementary policy instruments for mitigating exposure to geopolitical risk at the refining stage. We show that reducing China’s refining share substantially lowers refining-stage geopolitical risk, with larger gains for lithium than for copper. We find that stockpiling plays a critical role in buffering near-term geopolitical shocks, but significantly increases the projected shortfall in copper and lithium which is needed to realize the clean energy transition under alternative Net Zero pathways. We demonstrate that AI-driven productivity gains will be needed to narrow the projected supply gaps for both minerals. Our results suggest that ensuring effective security of critical minerals requires a coordinated policy mix, combining refining diversification, strategic stockpiling, and productivity-enhancing technological change.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Critical Minerals; Copper; Lithium; Geopolitical Risk; Refining bottlenecks
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q41 - Demand and Supply ; Prices; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy

References

1. Acemoglu, D., Tahbaz-Salehi, A. The macroeconomics of supply chain disruptions. Rev. Econ. Stud. 92, 656–695 (2025). 2. Ali, D., & Frimpong, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and process automation: Existing knowledge frontier and way forward for mining sector. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(8), 6025-6042. 3. Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M. Measuring geopolitical risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 112, 1194–1225 (2022). 4. Flores, V., Keith, B., & Leiva, C. (2020). Using artificial intelligence techniques to improve the prediction of copper recovery by leaching. Journal of Sensors, 2020(1), 2454875. 5. Fraser Institute (2022) Annual Survey of Mining Companies. Fraser Institute: Vancouver, BC. 6. Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B. and Evans, O., 2018. When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62, pp.729-754. 7. Hine, A., Gibson, C., & Mayes, R. (2023). Critical minerals: rethinking extractivism? Australian Geographer, 54(3), 233-250. 8. Howald, Q. (2025). Implementing Automated Inspection Systems in Copper Tankhouses. In: 12th International Copper Conference. COPR 2025. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-00102-3_30 9. Hyder, Z., Siau, K. and Nah, F., 2019. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and autonomous technologies in mining industry. Journal of Database Management, 30(2), pp.67-79. 10. IEA (2024), Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2024, Licence: CC BY 4.0 11. IEA (2025). Critical Minerals Dataset. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/critical-minerals-dataset. 12. Jooshaki, M., Nad, A., & Michaux, S. (2021). A systematic review on the application of machine learning in exploiting mineralogical data in mining and mineral industry. Minerals, 11(8), 816. 13. Kang, W., Smyth, R., Vespignani, J. (2025) The Macroeconomic Fragility of Critical Mineral Markets. CAMA Working Paper 21/2025 14. Kapoor, S., & Narayanan, A. (2023). Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science. Patterns, 4(9), 100804. 15. Rosenblatt, M., Tejavibulya, L., Jiang, R. et al. Data leakage inflates prediction performance in connectome-based machine learning models. Nat Communications 15, 1829 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46150-w 16. Kenzhaliyev, B., Imankulov, T., Mukhanbet, A., Kvyatkovskiy, S., Dyussebekova, M., & Tasmurzayev, N. (2025). Intelligent System for Reducing Waste and Enhancing Efficiency in Copper Production Using Machine Learning. Metals, 15(2), 186. 17. Masouleh, S. S. M., Sanz, C. A., Jansonius, R. P., Shi, S., Romero, M. J. G., Hein, J. E., & Hattrick-Simpers, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence-enabled optimization of battery-grade lithium carbonate production. Digital Discovery, 3(11), 2320-2326. 18. Newbery, D.M., Stiglitz, J.E. The theory of commodity price stabilization. A study in the economics of risk. (1981). 19. OECD (2023). Critical minerals for the energy transition: Investment, trade, and geopolitical risks. Paris: OECD. 20. Onifade, M., Adebisi, J. A., Shivute, A. P., & Genc, B. (2023). Challenges and applications of digital technology in the mineral industry. Resources Policy, 85, 103978. 21. Ortiz, E. M. (2021). The Role of the State and The Environmental Impacts of Lithium Mining in Jujuy, Argentina. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles. 22. Othman, R, (2024) Analyzing Trump's Foreign Policy Expectations. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5075540 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5075540 23. Pedersen, A., Jaswal, M. A tale of a looming surplus in the lithium industry: sticky supply to stay? https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/a-tale-of-a-looming-surplus-in-the-lithium-industry-sticky-supply-to-stay/ (2024). 24. Prosser, D. (2024) ABC News. Sydney bishop among those stabbed in Wakeley church attack. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-15/wakeley-church-stabbing-terrorism-attack/102561234 (2024). 25. Saadaoui, J., Smyth, R., Vespignani, J. Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals. Energy Econ. 142, 108195 (2025). 26. S&P Global Market Intelligence (n.d.). S&P Global Market Intelligence. https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en

27. Smith, D., Pengally, M. Donald Trump elected US president in stunning political resurrection. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/06/donald-trump-wins-us-presidential-election (2024).

28. Temper, L., Avila, S., Del Bene, D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Le Billon, P., ... & Walter, M. (2020). Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 123004. 29. USGS. Mineral commodity summaries 2025. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2025/mcs2025.pdf (2025). 30. Vespignani, J., Smyth, R. Artificial intelligence investments reduce risks to critical mineral supply. Nat. Commun. 15, 7304 (2024). 31. You, M., Li, S., Li, D. and Xu, S., 2021. Applications of artificial intelligence for coal mine gas risk assessment. Safety Science, 143, p.105420. 32. Wright, B.D., Williams, J.C. The economic role of commodity storage. Econ. J. 92, 596–614 (1982). 33. Xu, Z., Ding, Y., Han, S. C., & Zhang, C. (2024). Predicting the performance of lithium adsorption and recovery from unconventional water sources with machine learning. Water Research, 266, 122374.