Principlism as a tool for addressing communication issues in health and social care

Moya, Dr Rhianne Rhiana Olanre (2025): Principlism as a tool for addressing communication issues in health and social care. Published in: Elsevier Journals (2026)

Abstract

The concept of principlism is defined by Keeling and Bellefleur (2016), as “a normative ethical framework designed for practical decision making in health care.” They also highlight the approach as focusing “on what people generally agree upon” - in the form of mid level principles, and refer to Beauchamp and Childress’ statement (1994:17), that “ the rules and principles shared across these theories, typically serve practical judgment more adequately than theories”, as well as highlighting the fact that “often little is lost in practical moral decision making by dispensing with general moral theories.”

Balancing principles from a practical perspective, is required for sound decision making, rather than approaching it from a purely theoretical perspective. This is particularly important in contexts where ethical principles conflict with one another.

As well as explaining the four individual ethical principles, this paper highlights how such conflicts occur. Further, questions relating to the balancing of ethical principles – as well as communication barriers and issues will addressed.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: principlism, dignity, autonomy, beneficence, non maleficence, justice
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I15 - Health and Economic Development; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality

References

Audit Commission (2010). Against the Odds: Re-engaging Young People in Education, Employment or Training (Local Government)

Auschra, C. (2018). Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter Organisational Settings: A Literature Review

Beauchamp, T.L. (1996). The Role of Principles in Practical Ethics in L.W. Sumner & J. Boyle (eds), Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Beauchamp, T.L. (2007). The “Four Principles” Approach to Health Care and Ethics, Second Edition. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Beauchamp, T.L. & Childress, J.F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fourth Edition. Oxford University Press

Childress, J.F., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D., Goshin, L. O., Kahn, J., Bonnie, R. J., & Nieberg, P. (2002). Public Health Ethics: Mapping the Terrain. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 30, 170-178

Equality Act 2010

General Medical Council , Code of Conduct

Human Rights Act 1998

Jahn, W. T. (2011). The Four Basic Ethical Principles that Apply to Forensic Activities are Respect for Autonomy, Beneficence, Non Maleficence, and Justice Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, Elsevier (2011), 10:225-226

Keeling, M. and Bellefleur, O. (2016). “Principlism” and Frameworks in Public Health Ethics. Montreal, Quebec NCCHPP(National Collaborating Centre for Health Policy, Institut National de Sante Publique

Lawrence, D. J. (2007). The Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics: A Foundation for Current Bioethical Debate Journal of Chiropractic Humanities

Mental Capacity Act 2005

Moss, B. (2025). Communication Skills in Health and Social Care

NHS Health Education England (2017). Code of Practice: Provision of Information for Postgraduate Medical Training

Shea, M. (2020).Principlism’s Balancing Act: Why the Principles of Biomedical Ethics Need a Theory of the Good

United Nations (2021). UN Declaration of Human Rights https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021/03/udhr.pdf