Zhang, ZhongXiang (2006): China, the United States and technology cooperation on climate control.
Download (149kB) | Preview
The U.S. and China are the world’s largest and second largest CO2 emitters, respectively, and to what extent the U.S. and China get involved in combating global climate change is extremely important both for lowering compliance costs of climate mitigation and adaptation and for moving international climate negotiations forward. While it is unavoidable that China will take on commitments at some specific point of time in the future, this paper has argued that the proposal for joint accession by the U.S. and China is not a way forward. For various reasons, such a proposal is in the U.S. interest, but is not in the interest of China. Given the U.S. political reality and institutional settings on the one hand and China’s over-riding concern about economic growth and poverty reduction on the other, the two countries are unlikely to take on emissions caps under an international regime, at least for the time being. Therefore, we need to explore the area where cooperation between the two countries to address climate change seems best. The research, development and deployment of clean technology is the area that is in the best interests of the two countries. The U.S. has adopted a technology-oriented approach to climate issues, and has launched the four multilateral initiatives on technology cooperation and the Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate (APP). China has participated in all these U.S.-led initiatives, and is a partner to the APP. Strengthened technology cooperation between the two countries through these initiatives and the APP has led some tangible benefits. However, it should be pointed out that while technology is a critical ingredient in a climate policy package, efforts such as the APP can only be part of the solution. They alone cannot ensure that best available technologies are always deployed in the marketplace, and that new technologies will roll out at the pace and on the scale that we need. In order to have such technology-oriented approach to play a full role, we do need a coordinated policy framework agreed via the Kyoto Protocol or a follow-up regime or the parent United Nations Framework Convention.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||China, the United States and technology cooperation on climate control|
|Keywords:||Clean technology; Technology cooperation; Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate; Kyoto Protocol; China; United States|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||ZhongXiang Zhang|
|Date Deposited:||17. Jan 2009 09:18|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 08:45|
ABARE (2006), Technological Development and Economic Growth, Research Report No. 06.1, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE), Canberra, Available at: www.abareconomics.com/publications_html/climate/climate_06/06_climate.pdf.
Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate (APP, 2006), Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean Development and Climate Executive Summary of Task Force Action Plans, Available at: http://www.asiapacificpartnership.org/ActionPlans.htm.
Chea, T. (2006), China’s Growing Pollution Reaches U.S., Fox News, July 28, Available at: http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Jul28/0,4670,TransPacificPollution,00.html.
Clean Edge (2006), Clean Energy Trends 2006, Available at: www.cleanedge.com/reports/trends2006.pdf.
Griffin, M. (2006), Asia-Pacific Partnership: Climate Policy or Climate Ploy, Carbon Finance Asia 2006, A Special Supplement to Environmental Finance, pp. 16-19.
Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C. and D. Brack (1999), The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment, Earthscan, London.
IEA (2006), World Energy Outlook 2006, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
Little, A. (2005), Pact or Fiction?: New Asia-Pacific Climate Pact is Long on PR, Short on Substance, Available at: http://grist.org/news/muck/2005/08/04/little-pact/?source=muck.
Point Carbon (2006), Carbon 2006: Towards a Truly Global Market, Oslo, Norway.
Regan, J. (2006), US Says Industry Key to Six-Nation Climate Pact, Reuters, January 11, Available at: http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/34413/newsDate/11-Jan-2006/story.htm.
Richard B. Stewart and Jonathan B. Wiener (2003), Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto, American Enterprise Press, Washington, DC.
U.S. DOE (2006), U.S. and China Announce Cooperation on FutureGen and Sign Energy Efficiency Protocol at U.S.-China Strategic Economic Dialogue, Press Release, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Available at: http://www.doe.gov/news/4535.htm.
U.S. EPA (2006), Power Plant to be Largest Run on Coal Mine Methane, Press Release, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), May 18, Available at: http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/4d84d5d9a719de8c85257018005467c2/8ec89e33e48a863f852571720063e8d7!OpenDocument.
World Bank (2006), State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2006: A Focus on Africa, Washington, DC, November.
Zhang, Z.X. (2000a), Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics, Vol. 136, No. 3, pp. 491-521.
Zhang, Z.X. (2000b), Can China Afford to Commit itself an Emissions Cap? An Economic and Political Analysis, Energy Economics, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 587-614.
Zhang, Z.X. (2004), Meeting the Kyoto Targets: The Importance of Developing Country Participation, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Zhang, Z.X. (2005), Sustainable Energy Development in China: Challenges Ahead to 2020, The Keynote Address at the International Conference on “Staying Ahead of the Energy Scenarios”, Bangkok, Thailand, November 11.
Zhang, Z.X. (2006), Cutting Carbon Emissions While Making Money: A Wishful Thinking or A Win-Win Opportunity?, The Keynote Address at the Plenary Session on Making Money from Saving Carbon at the 29th International Association for Energy Economics International Conference, Potsdam, Germany, June 8.
Zhang, Z.X. (2007), China’s Hunt for Oil in Africa in Perspective, Energy and Environment, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 87-92.