Tonetto, Jorge Luis and Fochezatto, Adelar and Pique, Josep Miquel and Rapetti, Carina (2026): Behavioral engagement and fiscal incentive design: time series evidence from southern Brazil.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_128174.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, implemented four behavioral experiments aimed at improving tax compliance. This study contributes to the literature by examining multiple behavioral tax programs over an extended period, providing a longitudinal assessment of citizen engagement. It highlights changes in citizen engagement in the Tax Education Program and their possible causes, focusing on the evolution of new subscribers over time and their relationship with the implementation of innovative projects. We estimate time-series regression models for new subscribers between November 2012 and May 2023, including specifications with and without structural breaks. The results show three moments of high impact on subscriber numbers. The key moment corresponds to the launch of Devolve-ICMS and Receita Certa, with a 635% increase in new subscribers. Inflation showed a small negative impact. Reductions in prize amounts and low-value incentives negatively affected engagement. Programs that provided direct and visible financial returns to citizens—reinforcing perceptions of fairness and reciprocity in the tax system—showed particularly strong effects on engagement. The findings suggest that tax innovations were successful in increasing citizen engagement and, consequently, reducing tax evasion.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Behavioral engagement and fiscal incentive design: time series evidence from southern Brazil |
| English Title: | Behavioral engagement and fiscal incentive design: time series evidence from southern Brazil |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Behavioral economics; Tax compliance; Technological Change; Time series analysis; Public policy; Brazil JEL Codes: D91, H26, O33, C22, H11, O54 |
| Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O54 - Latin America ; Caribbean |
| Item ID: | 128174 |
| Depositing User: | DR. Jorge Luis Tonetto |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Mar 2026 01:02 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Mar 2026 01:02 |
| References: | Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10797-011-9171-2 Alm, J., Burgstaller, L., Domi, A., März, A., & Kasper, M. (2023). Nudges, Boosts, and Sludge: Using New Behavioral Approaches to Improve Tax Compliance. Economies, 11(9), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11090223 Ávila, F., & Bianchi, A. M. (2015). Guia de economia comportamental e experimental (1ª ed.). São Paulo: Editora EC. Bachas, P., Flores, T., Lara Ibarra, G., Mantovani, A. A., Oliveira, E. S. de, Padilha, G., & Scot, T. (2025). VAT cashback programs in practice: The case of Devolve-ICMS in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (Prosperity Insight Series). World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099082825110521060 Bai, J., & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998540 Becker, S., Gandhi, W., Elfassy, N. M., & Schweinhardt, P. (2013). The role of dopamine in the perceptual modulation of nociceptive stimuli by monetary wins or losses. European Journal of Neuroscience, 38(7), 3080–3088. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12303 Bird, R. (2010). Smart tax administration. Economic Premise (No. 36). World Bank, Washington, DC.Available in: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/10152 Björklund Larsen, L. (2023). Game of tax: Rethinking the relationship between redistribution and reciprocity through a Georgian tax lottery. Economic Anthropology, 10(1), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12269 Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4–5), 303–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6 Buehn, A., & Schneider, F. (2016). Size and development of tax evasion in 38 OECD countries: What do we (not) know? Journal of Economic and Political Economy, 3(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256040463_Size_and_Development_of_Tax_Evasion_in_38_OECD_Countries_What_do_we_not_know Carpenter, J. P., Garcia, J. R., & Lum, J. K. (2011). Dopamine receptor genes predict risk preferences, time preferences, and related economic choices. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(3), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-011-9115-3 Carvalho, H. C., Afonso, A, & Mazzon, J. A. (2023). Tax compliance in the wild: Critical review of nudging and proposition of an integrative framework. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 20(1), e220040.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2023220040 Cebula, R. J., & Feige, E. L. (2012). America’s unreported economy: Measuring the size, growth, and determinants of income tax evasion in the U.S. Crime, Law and Social Change, 57(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9346-x Clements, M. P., & Hendry, D. F. (1996). Intercept corrections and structural change. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199609)11:5<475::AID-JAE409>3.0.CO;2-9 Costa, A. C. A. D. R., Krieger, M. G. M., & Fontoura, Y. (2022). Conformidade fiscal e economia comportamental: Uma análise da influência do contexto decisório. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 42(1), 1062–1079. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3343 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27739926 Fabbri, M. (2015). Shaping tax norms through lotteries. International Review of Law and Economics, 44, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.07.002 Fabbri, M., & Hemels, S. (2013). "Do you want a receipt?" Combating VAT and sales tax evasion with lottery tickets: Involving customers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2232249 Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. CREMA Working Paper, No. 2006-10. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214356 Fehr, G., Kamm, A., & Jäger, M. (2015). The behavioral change matrix—A tool for evidence-based policy making. In A. Samson (Ed.), The Behavioral Economics Guide 2015.Available in: http://www.behavioraleconomics.com Feio, K. J. G., Rossi, M. D. C., & Leal, C. P. (2022). A trajetória da dívida pública brasileira analisada por meio do método de quebras estruturais. In E. M. Senhoras (Ed.), Administração: Gestão, Empreendedorismo e Marketing. Ponta Grossa: Editora Atena. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.5612216031 Gamannossi degl’Innocenti, D., & Rablen, M. D. (2020). Tax evasion on a social network. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 169, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2019.11.001 Gautam, V. (2012). An empirical study on financial products offered by Indian retail banks to assess the relationship between sale promotions, time to reward receipt, and customer preference. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 11(4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2012.730969 Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2018). Avaliação de impacto na prática. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial. Available in: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4d0504c2-bedf-5218-939b-cc17b3c238f3/content Hahn, A., Reed, M. B., Pichler, V., Michenthaler, P., Rischka, L., Godbersen, G. M., Wadsak, W., Hacker, M., & Lanzenberger, R. (2021). Functional dynamics of dopamine synthesis during monetary reward and punishment processing. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 41(11), 2973–2985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X211019827 Hendry, D. F. (2000). On detectable and non-detectable structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00020-5 Kachelmeier, S. J., & Shehata, M. (1992). Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People’s Republic of China. The American Economic Review, 82(5), 1120–1141. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., Jessell, T. M., Siegelbaum, S., Hudspeth, A. J., & Mack, S. (Eds.). (2000). Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill. Keh, H., & Lee, Y. (2006). Do reward programs build loyalty for services? The moderating effect of satisfaction on type and timing of rewards. Journal of Retailing, 82(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2006.02.004 Lopes, A. S. (2021). Uma introdução à análise de estabilidade dos coeficientes. Lisboa: ISEG/ULISBOA. Available in: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/17668 Mazzucato, M. (2021). Missão economia: Um guia inovador para mudar o capitalismo. São Paulo: Editora Scharcz S.A., Portfolio-Penguin. McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695), 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100907 Nicolaides, P. (2024). Characteristics and responses of winners in the Greek tax lottery. International Tax and Public Finance, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-024-09872-7 Oliveira, C. A., & Pias, D. (2021). A sustentabilidade da política fiscal na presença de quebras estruturais: Uma evidência para o Rio Grande do Sul. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 54. https://doi.org/10.38116/ppp54art05 Purves, D., Augustine, G., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A., Mooney, R., & White, L. E. (2018). Neuroscience (6ª ed.). Sinauer. Samson, A. (2014). The Behavioral Economics Guide. Available in: https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/the-behavioral-economics-guide-2014/ Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976 Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254 Slemrod, J. (2007). Cheating ourselves: The economics of tax evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.1.25 Slemrod, J. (2024). What taxpayers, governments and tax economists do – and what they should do. Fiscal Studies, 45(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12324 Souza, T. S. C. de, & Souza, P. A. C. de. (2018). Desenvolvendo projetos para disseminação da cidadania fiscal. In: Educação fiscal e cidadania. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS/CEGOV. Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. H. (2019). Nudge: Como tomar melhores decisões sobre saúde, dinheiro e felicidade. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva. Tonetto, J. L., Fochezatto, A., & da Silva, G. P. (2023a). Refund of consumption tax to low-income people: Impact assessment using difference-in-differences. Economies, 11(6), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11060153 Tonetto, J. L., Fochezatto, A., & Pique, J. M. (2023b). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of the Menor Preço Brasil application. Administrative Sciences, 13(11), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13110229 Tonetto, J. L., Fochezatto, A., & Pique, J. M. (2024a). Monetary incentives to improve tax compliance: A Brazilian case study. Development Policy Review, e12770. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12770 Tonetto, J. L., Pique, J. M., Fochezatto, A., & Rapetti, C. (2024b). Tax evasion and company survival: A Brazilian case study. Economies, 12(11), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12110286. Tonetto, J. L., Fochezatto, A., Pique, J. M., & Rapetti, C. (2025). Instant lottery innovation, tax compliance and herd effects, an impact assessment in Brazil. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 96, 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.70003 Tonetto, J. L. (2026). The digital government: Innovation and data-driven tax compliance. Simplíssimo Livros. https://doi.org/10.71019/855716 Torgler, B. (2004). Tax morale, trust and corruption: Empirical evidence from transition countries. CREMA Working Paper, No. 2004-05. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214291 Wenzel, M. (2005). Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(6), 862–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.02.002 World Bank. (2025). Behavioral insights for tax compliance: A whole-house approach to improving taxpayer and tax official beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors (Policy Note). The World Bank. Zald, D. H., Boileau, I., El-Dearedy, W., Gunn, R., McGlone, F., Dichter, G. S., & Dagher, A. (2004). Dopamine transmission in the human striatum during monetary reward tasks. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(17), 4105–4112. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4643-03.2004 |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/128174 |

