How Biotrade Openness Shrinks the Ecological Footprint

Stomps, Boris and Can, Muhlis and Brusselaers, Jan (2024): How Biotrade Openness Shrinks the Ecological Footprint.

Abstract

This study investigates the environmental implications of biotrade openness, defined as the trade of biodiversity-based products as a share of GDP, within OECD countries between 2010 and 2022. Drawing on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and trade–environment nexus frameworks, the research aims to assess whether biotrade contributes to ecological sustainability in trade by reducing the ecological footprint. To address this objective, we construct a panel dataset for 37 OECD economies and apply a suite of advanced econometric techniques. These include cross-sectionally augmented IPS (CIPS) unit root tests, Westerlund cointegration tests, method of moments quantile regression (MMQR), fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS), and Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality tests. The ecological footprint, sourced from the Global Footprint Network, serves as the primary indicator of environmental pressure. Empirical findings confirm the presence of an EKC relationship: economic growth initially increases ecological footprint, but after a threshold, further growth leads to environmental improvements. Most notably, biotrade openness exerts a consistent and statistically significant negative effect on the ecological footprint. This suggests that expanding biodiversity-based trade reduces environmental stress. These results have important policy implications. For OECD countries, promoting biotrade appears to be a viable strategy for aligning economic growth with environmental sustainability. The findings also support the integration of biotrade into environmental policy frameworks, trade agreements, and biodiversity conservation strategies. Policymakers should further incentivize sustainable supply chains and verify compliance with BioTrade principles to fully realize environmental gains.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Biotrade Openness; Trade; Ecological Footprint; Biodiversity; OECD; EKC; Quantile Regression; Sustainability.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Adebayo, T. S., Akadiri, S. S., Akanni, E. O., & Sadiq-Bamgbopa, Y. (2022). Does political risk drive environmental degradation in BRICS countries? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21), 32287–32297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20002-w Ali, Md. I., Islam, Md. M., & Ceh, B. (2024). Growth-environment nexus in Canada: Revisiting EKC via demand and supply dynamics. Energy & Environment, 0958305X241263833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241263833 Ansari, M. A., & Khan, N. A. (2021). Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for high income, upper and lower middle income countries: What do the composition, scale, and technique effect indicate? Ecological Indicators, 121, 107122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107122 Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877 Barbier, E. B. (2000). Biodiversity, trade and international agreements. Journal of Economic Studies, 27(1/2), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005310 Barde, J.-P. (1994). Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy: Lessons from the OECD Experience and their Relevance to Developing Economies. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/754416133402 Bifani, P., Agardy, T., Vivas Eugui, D., Jaramillo, L., Gómez- García, R., & Vignati, F. (2019). Blue BioTrade: Harnessing Marine Trade to Support Ecological Sustainability and Economic Equity. CAF y UNCTAC. https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1415 Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111 Can, M., Ahmad, M., & Khan, Z. (2021). The impact of export composition on environment and energy demand: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 33599–33612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13084-5 Can, M., Ahmed, Z., Mercan, M., & Kalugina, O. A. (2021). The role of trading environment-friendly goods in environmental sustainability: Does green openness matter for OECD countries? Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113038 Can, M., Ben Jebli, M., & Brusselaers, J. (2022). Can green trade save the environment? Introducing the Green (Trade) Openness Index. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(29), 44091–44102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18920-w Can, M., & Gozgor, G. (2017). The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: Evidence from France. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(19), 16364–16370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9219-7 Can, M., Oluc, I., Sturm, B., Guzel, I., Gavurova, B., & Popp, J. (2022). Nexus Between Trading Non-Green Products and Environment: Introducing Non-Green Trade Openness Index. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.950453 Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148 CBD. (2011). Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/convention/text Chaudhary, A., & Kastner, T. (2016). Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Global Environmental Change, 38, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.013 Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: The role of ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4 Dong, K., Hochman, G., Zhang, Y., Sun, R., Li, H., & Liao, H. (2018). CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: Empirical evidence across regions. Energy Economics, 75, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.017 Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 Edgerton, D., & Westerlund, J. (2008). A Simple Test for Cointegration in Dependent Panels with Structural Breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 665–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x Elias, M., Liboni, L. B., Cezarino, L. O., Pinheiro Martins, F., Pimenta, M. L., Hilletofth, P., & Hilmola, O.-P. (2022). Shedding Light on the Brazilian Amazon Biotrade: A Study on Sustainable Development in Native Communities. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912826 Fanin, N., Gundale, M. J., Farrell, M., Ciobanu, M., Baldock, J. A., Nilsson, M.-C., Kardol, P., & Wardle, D. A. (2018). Consistent effects of biodiversity loss on multifunctionality across contrasting ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0415-0 Fernández-Pons, X. (2021). Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in the International Regulation of Trade in Goods. In M. Campins Eritja & T. Fajardo del Castillo (Eds), Biological Diversity and International Law: Challenges for the Post 2020 Scenario (pp. 79–99). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72961-5_5 Gale, L. R., & Mendez, J. A. (1998). The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment. International Review of Economics & Finance, 7(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-0560(99)80016-1 Global Footprint Network. (2023). Open Data Platform [Data set]. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.170625440.14444985.1715697853-1659438502.1715697853#/countryTrends?type=BCpc,EFCpc&cn=231 Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914 Isbell, F., Gonzalez, A., Loreau, M., Cowles, J., Díaz, S., Hector, A., Mace, G. M., Wardle, D. A., O’Connor, M. I., Duffy, J. E., Turnbull, L. A., Thompson, P. L., & Larigauderie, A. (2017). Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature, 546(7656), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22899 Jakob, M., & Marschinski, R. (2013). Interpreting trade-related CO2 emission transfers. Nature Climate Change, 3(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1630 Jiang, S., Mentel, G., Shahzadi, I., Ben Jebli, M., & Iqbal, N. (2022). Renewable energy, trade diversification and environmental footprints: Evidence for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Renewable Energy, 187, 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.134 Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., Lenzen, M., & Geschke, A. (2014). International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution. Global Environmental Change, 24, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.008 Kang, H. (2021). CO2 Emissions Embodied in International Trade and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence for OECD and Non-OECD Countries. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112114 Karahan, H. (2017). Export Diversification in Emerging Economies. In Ü. Hacioğlu & H. Dinçer (Eds), Global Financial Crisis and Its Ramifications on Capital Markets: Opportunities and Threats in Volatile Economic Conditions (pp. 287–296). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47021-4_21 Khan, I., Zakari, A., Ahmad, M., Irfan, M., & Hou, F. (2022). Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries. Gondwana Research, 103, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.10.026 Kim, D.-H., Suen, Y.-B., & Lin, S.-C. (2019). Carbon dioxide emissions and trade: Evidence from disaggregate trade data. Energy Economics, 78, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.019 Kuna-Marszałek, A. (2016). International trade and the environment. https://doi.org/10.18778/8088-016-0.02 Lange, L., Connor, K. O., Arason, S., Bundgård-Jørgensen, U., Canalis, A., Carrez, D., Gallagher, J., Gøtke, N., Huyghe, C., Jarry, B., Llorente, P., Marinova, M., Martins, L. O., Mengal, P., Paiano, P., Panoutsou, C., Rodrigues, L., Stengel, D. B., van der Meer, Y., & Vieira, H. (2021). Developing a Sustainable and Circular Bio-Based Economy in EU: By Partnering Across Sectors, Upscaling and Using New Knowledge Faster, and For the Benefit of Climate, Environment & Biodiversity, and People & Business. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.619066 Lee, C.-C., Olasehinde-Williams, G., & Gyamfi, B. A. (2023). The synergistic effect of green trade and economic complexity on sustainable environment: A new perspective on the economic and ecological components of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2433 Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Foran, B., Lobefaro, L., & Geschke, A. (2012). International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486(7401), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11145 Li, Q., Sharif, A., Razzaq, A., & Yu, Y. (2022). Do climate technology, financialization, and sustainable finance impede environmental challenges? Evidence from G10 economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122095 Ling, C. H., Ahmed, K., Binti Muhamad, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2015). Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: What do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24), 20131–20142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5217-9 Liu, D., Guo, X., & Xiao, B. (2019). What causes growth of global greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from 40 countries. Science of The Total Environment, 661, 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.197 Machado, J. A. F., & Santos Silva, J. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009 Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631 Mania, E. (2020). Export Diversification and CO2 Emissions: An Augmented Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of International Development, 32(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3441 MEA. (2005). Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Ecosystems%20and%20Human%20Well-being%3A%20Synthesis&publication_year=2005&author=Millennium%20Ecosystem%20Assessment Merlin, M. L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Analysis of the factors affecting electricity consumption in DR Congo using fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) and canonical cointegrating regression (CCR) estimation approach. Energy, 232, 121025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121025 Mikhaylov, A., Moiseev, N., Aleshin, K., & Burkhardt, T. (2020). Global climate change and greenhouse effect. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7, 2897–2913. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21) Mitić, P., Kresoja, M., & Minović, J. (2019). A Literature Survey of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Economic Analysis, 52(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.19.52.12.pp109-127 Mohamed, A., DeClerck, F., Verburg, P. H., Obura, D., Abrams, J. F., Zafra-Calvo, N., Rocha, J., Estrada-Carmona, N., Fremier, A., Jones, S. K., Meier, I. C., & Stewart-Koster, B. (2024). Securing Nature’s Contributions to People requires at least 20%–25% (semi-)natural habitat in human-modified landscapes. One Earth, 7(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.008 OECD. (2023). Green growth and sustainable development—OECD. https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/ Oliva, M. J. (2015, July 1). Ethical BioTrade, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development. | Asian Biotechnology & Development Review | EBSCOhost. https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/gcd:112147794?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:gcd:112147794 Oluc, I., Can, M., Eronal, Y., & Saboori, B. (2024). Assessing the environmental implications of structural change in middle-income countries: Introducing the structural change index. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(8), 6339–6356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05408-4 Our World in Data. (2023). Energy Data Explorer. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/energy Ozcan, B., Tzeremes, P. G., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 84, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.010 Pedroni, P. (2004). PANEL COINTEGRATION: ASYMPTOTIC AND FINITE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF POOLED TIME SERIES TESTS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE PPP HYPOTHESIS. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073 Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/446 Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7 Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156 Razzaq, A., Wang, Y., Chupradit, S., Suksatan, W., & Shahzad, F. (2021). Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework. Technology in Society, 66, 101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101656 Rees, W. (2018). Ecological footprint. In Companion to Environmental Studies. Routledge. Riekhof, M.-C., Regnier, E., & Quaas, M. F. (2019). Economic growth, international trade, and the depletion or conservation of renewable natural resources. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 97, 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.04.008 Ritchie, H. (2019). How do CO2 emissions compare when we adjust for trade? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/consumption-based-co2 Rosensaft, S. (2021). BioTrade: A Key to Climate, Social, and Economic Despair, Sustainable Measures Applied to Myanmar Businesses Show Hope for the Future. The Synapse: Intercollegiate Science Magazine, 29(1). https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/synapse/vol29/iss1/7 Saboori, B., Zaibet, L., & Boughanmi, H. (2022). Export diversification, energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation: Evidence from Oman. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 43(1), 8486–8504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2091026 Scheffers, B. R., Oliveira, B. F., Lamb, I., & Edwards, D. P. (2019). Global wildlife trade across the tree of life. Science, 366(6461), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5327 Singh, T. (2010). Does International Trade Cause Economic Growth? A Survey. The World Economy, 33(11), 1517–1564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01243.x Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763 The World Bank. (2023). World Development Indicators | DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD&country=# Tyagi, S., Garg, N., & Paudel, R. (2014). Environmental Degradation: Causes and Consequences. European Researcher, 81, 1491. https://doi.org/10.13187/er.2014.81.1491 UN. (2024, May 30). United Nations Treaty Collection. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-d&chapter=27&clang=_en UNCTAD. (2014). The Business of BioTrade: Using Biological Resources Sustainably and Responsibly. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcbcc20094_en.pdf UNCTAD. (2023). BioTrade Congress VI: Trade and biodiversity for a positive future. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcted2023d3_en.pdf UNCTAD. (2024). The generation of Green and Sustainable Business (GSB) as a mechanism for accelerating contributions through biodiversity-based supply chains. https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/ditc-ted-26032024-BTcongress7-Columbia-1.pdf UNCTADstat. (2020). UNCTADstat—Trade in biodiversity-based products. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Biotrade.html UNCTADstat. (2023, November 21). BiotradeMerchShare. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/datacentre/dataviewer/US.BiotradeMerchShare Usman, M., Kousar, R., Yaseen, M. R., & Makhdum, M. S. A. (2020). An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: A continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(31), 38995–39018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3 van Hek, S., Muhlis, C., & Brusselaers, J. (2024). The Impact of Non-Green Trade Openness on Environmental Degradation in Newly Industrialized Countries | Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v2i2.148 van Ledden, A., Can, M., & Brusselaers, J. (2024). Toward a Greener Future: Investigating the Environmental Quality of Non-Green Trading in OECD Countries | Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics. Ekonomikalia Journal of Economics, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.60084/eje.v2i1.149 Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967 Wysokińska, Z. (2020). A Review of Transnational Regulations in Environmental Protection and the Circular Economy. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 23(4), 149–168. Xin, Y., Ajaz, T., Shahzad, M., & Luo, J. (2023). How productive capacities influence trade-adjusted resources consumption in China: Testing resource-based EKC. Resources Policy, 81, 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103329 Yahyaoui, I., & Bouchoucha, N. (2021). The long-run relationship between ODA, growth and governance: An application of FMOLS and DOLS approaches. African Development Review, 33(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12489 Yakubu, I. N., Kapusuzoglu, A., & Ceylan, N. B. (2022). Investigating the Role of Export Diversification, Remittances, and Environmental Sustainability in Accordance with Clean Energy and Zero Emission. In H. Dinçer & S. Yüksel (Eds), Circular Economy and the Energy Market: Achieving Sustainable Economic Development Through Energy Policy (pp. 51–65). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13146-2_5 Zhao, J., Jiang, Q., Dong, X., & Dong, K. (2020). Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case study. Energy Economics, 87, 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104712