PPML, Gravity, and Heterogeneous Trade Elasticities

Tyazhelnikov, Vladimir and Shi, Xuetao and Zhou, Xinbei (2026): PPML, Gravity, and Heterogeneous Trade Elasticities.

Abstract

We revisit the gravity equation, the most widely used empirical tool in international trade, and show that common estimators recover distinct parameters when trade elasticities are heterogeneous: Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood (PPML) estimates the aggregate elasticity, while ordinary least squares (OLS) and Gamma PML estimate the average elasticity. We demonstrate that, contrary to common belief, differences between OLS and PPML estimates are driven primarily by elasticity heterogeneity rather than heteroskedasticity of an error term or inclusion of zero trade flows. We develop a simple test for heterogeneity and, applying it to disaggregated trade data, reject homogeneity in at least 57% of industries. We then introduce a weighted PPML (WPPML) estimator to recover the aggregate effects of arbitrary, non-uniform shocks. Using WPPML, we show that trade flows respond less to realized tariff reductions from 2001-2016 than to uniform liberalization, reflecting systematic selection in where barriers fall, with substantial variation across industries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Elasticity, heterogeneity, heteroskedasticity, gravity model, misspeci cation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C50 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade

References

Ai, C.and Chen, X. (2003). `Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions', Econometrica, Vol. 71(6), pp. 1795-1843.

Angrist, J. D. (1990). `Lifetime earnings and the vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records', The american economic review, pp. 313-336.

Arkolakis, C., Costinot, A.and Rodr guez-Clare, A. (2012). `New trade models, same old gains?', American Economic Review, Vol. 102(1), pp. 94-130.

Arvis, J. F.and Shepherd, B. (2013). `The poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimator: A solution to the `adding up' problem in gravity models', Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 20, pp. 515-519.

Bas, M., Mayer, T.and Thoenig, M. (2017). `From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and heterogeneity in the trade elasticity', Journal of International Economics, Vol. 108, pp. 1-19.

Breinlich, H., Novy, D.and Santos Silva, J. (2022). `Trade, gravity and aggregation', Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 1-29.

Carlsson, M., Messina, J.and Nordstr�om Skans, O. (2021). `Firm-level shocks and labour flows', The Economic Journal, Vol. 131(634), pp. 598-623.

Chen, N.and Novy, D. (2022). `Gravity and heterogeneous trade cost elasticities', The Economic Journal, Vol. 132(644), pp. 1349-1377.

Ciani, E.and Fisher, P. (2019). `Dif-in-dif estimators of multiplicative treatment effects', Journal of Econometric Methods, Vol. 8(1).

Correia, S. (2018). `Ivreghdfe: Stata module for extended instrumental variable regressions with multiple levels of  fixed effects'

Costinot, A.and Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2014). `Trade theory with numbers: Quantifying the consequences of globalization', Handbook of international economics, Vol. 4, pp. 197-261.

Coughlin, C. C.and Novy, D. (2016). `Estimating border effects: The impact of spatial aggregation', FRB St. Louis Working Paper.

Eaton, J., Kortum, S. S.and Sotelo, S. (2012). International trade: Linking micro and macro (tech. rep.). National bureau of economic research.

Feenstra, R. C., Luck, P., Obstfeld, M.and Russ, K. N. (2018). `In search of the armington elasticity', Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 100(1), pp. 135-150.

Fieler, A. C. (2011). `Nonhomotheticity and bilateral trade: Evidence and a quantitative explanation', Econometrica, Vol. 79, pp. 1069-1101.

Fontagne, L., Guimbard, H.and Orefice, G. (2022). `Tariff-based product-level trade elasticities', Journal of International Economics, Vol. 137, pp. 103-593.

Fratianni, M.and Kang, H. (2006). `Heterogeneous distance-elasticities in trade gravity models', Economics Letters, Vol. 90, pp. 68-71.

French, S. (2017). `Comparative advantage and biased gravity', UNSW Business School Research Paper.

Hausman, J. A.and Wise, D. A. (1981). `Stratification on endogenous variables and estimation: The gary income maintenance experiment', Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, pp. 365-391.

Head, K.and Mayer, T. (2014). `Gravity equations:Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook', Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 131-195.

Imbs, J.and Mejean, I. (2015). `Elasticity optimism', American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol. 7, pp. 43-83.

Imbs, J.and Mejean, I. (2017). `Trade elasticities', Review of International Economics, Vol.25, pp. 383-402.

Kehoe, T. J., Pujolas, P. S.and Rossbach, J. (2017). `Quantitative trade models: Developments and challenges', Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 295-325.

Larch, M., Wanner, J., Yotov, Y. V.and Zylkin, T. (2019). `Currency unions and trade: A ppml re-assessment with high-dimensional fixed effects', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, pp. 487-510.

Magerman, G., Studnicka, Z.and Van Hove, J. (2016). `Distance and border effects in international trade: A comparison of estimation methods', Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 1-31.

Mayer, T., Vicard, V.and Zignago, S. (2019). `The cost of non-europe, revisited', Economic Policy, Vol. 34(98), pp. 145-199.

Melitz, M. J. (2003). `The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity', Econometrica, Vol. 71, pp. 1695-1725.

Melitz, M. J.and Redding, S. J. (2015). `New trade models, new welfare implications', American Economic Review, Vol. 105(3), pp. 1105-1146.

Newey, W. K.and McFadden, D. (1994). `Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing', Handbook of econometrics, Vol. 4, pp. 2111-2245.

Novy, D. (2013). `International trade without ces: Estimating translog gravity', Journal of International Economics, Vol. 89, pp. 271-282.

Redding, S. J.and Weinstein, D. E. (2019). `Aggregation and the gravity equation', AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 109, pp. 450-55.

Santos Silva, J. M. C.and Tenreyro, S. (2006). `The log of gravity', The Review of Economics and statistics, Vol. 88, pp. 641-658.

Silva, J. S.and Winkelmann, R. (2024). `Misspecified exponential regressions: Estimation, interpretation, and average marginal e ects', Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 1-25.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). `Unobserved heterogeneity and estimation of average partial effects', Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg, pp. 27-55.

Yotov, Y. V. (2012). `A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade', Economics Letters, Vol. 117, pp. 794-798.

Yotov, Y. V., Piermartini, R., Monteiro, J.-A.and Larch, M. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model.World Trade Organization Geneva.