Max-Neef's 'Threshold Hypothesis' - 30 years later

Valenzuela-Rivera, Luis and Pastén, Roberto (2025): Max-Neef's 'Threshold Hypothesis' - 30 years later.

Abstract

Thirty years ago, Ecological Economics published a brief article by the Chilean economist Manfred Max-Neef in which he proposed a ``threshold hypothesis'': there is a GDP level after which economic growth may lead to a deterioration in the quality of life rather than its improvement. Does the hypothesis stand to the new and better data available? This paper addresses this question. First, it provides methodological clarifications which are relevant to the testing of the hypothesis, which have so far overlooked in the literature. Key is that the hypothesis as defined by Max-Neef is not really testable, so a weaker version is proposed. Second, in light of these clarifications, we test this weaker version using all ISEW data available to date, as well as life satisfaction data. Neither indicator supports the threshold hypothesis. Empirical caveats remain in place, particularly in the lack of coherence across ISEW/GPI studies. Many gaps remain for further research.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Threshold Hypothesis; ISEW; GPI; Life satisfaction; Happiness
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Accorsi, S., López, R. E., Azúa, M., and Vergara, V. (2022). Beyond the fetish of economic growth: Measuring sustainable economic welfare in chile. Working Paper No. 528. Agras, J. and Chapman, D. (1999). A dynamic approach to the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 28(2):267–277. Andrade, D. C. and Garcia, J. R. (2015). Estimating the genuine progress indicator (gpi) for brazil from 1970 to 2010. Ecological Economics, 118:49–56. Anielski, M. and Rowe, J. (1999). The genuine progress indicator: 1998 update. Technical report, Redefining Progress, San Francisco, CA. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., and Pi- mentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science, 268(5210):520–521. Beça, P. and Santos, R. (2014). A comparison between gdp and isew in decoupling analysis. Ecological Indicators, 46:167–176. Bergé, L. (2018). Efficient estimation of maximum likelihood models with multiple fixed- effects: the r package fenmlm. DEM Discussion Paper Series 18-13, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg. Beça, P. and Santos, R. (2010). Measuring sustainable welfare: A new approach to the isew. Ecological Economics, 69(4):810–819. Bleys, B. (2007). Simplifying the index of sustainable economic welfare: Methodology, data sources and a case study for the netherlands. International Journal of Environ- ment, Workplace and Employment, 3(2):103–118. Bleys, B. (2008). Proposed changes to the index of sustainable economic welfare: An application to belgium. Ecological Economics, 64(4):741–751. Boarini, R., Comola, M., Smith, C., Manchin, R., and de Keulenaer, F. (2012). What makes for a better life?: The determinants of subjective well-being in oecd countries: 33Evidence from the gallup world poll. OECD Statistics Working Papers 2012/3, OECD Publishing. Carta, V. and Porcu, M. (2010). Measures of wealth and well-being. a comparison between gdp and isew. Working Paper CRENoS 201006, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia. Castaneda, B. E. (1999). An index of sustainable economic welfare (isew) for chile. Ecological Economics, 28(2):231–244. Clark, A. (2016). Swb as a measure of individual well-being. In The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Oxford University Press. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., and Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1):95–144. Clarke, M. and Islam, S. M. (2005). Diminishing and negative welfare returns of eco- nomic growth: An index of sustainable economic welfare (isew) for thailand. Ecological Economics, 54(1):81–93. Cook, D. and Davíðsdóttir, B. (2021). An estimate of the genuine progress indicator for iceland, 2000–2019. Ecological Economics, 189:Article 107154. Daly, H. and Cobb, J. (1989). For the common good. Beacon Press. Daly, M. C., Wilson, D. J., and Johnson, N. J. (2013). Relative status and well-being: Evidence from u.s. suicide deaths. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5):1480– 1500. Diefenbacher, H. (1994). The index of sustainable economic welfare: A case study of the federal republic of germany. In Cobb, C. and Cobb, J., editors, The Green Na- tional Product: A Proposed Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare. University Press of America. Diefenbacher, H., Zieschank, R., and Rodenhäuser, D. (2010). Measuring welfare in 34germany. a suggestion for a new welfare index. type UBA-FB 001328/E, Federal Envi- ronment Agency (Umweltbundesamt). Diego-Rosell, P., Tortora, R., and Bird, J. (2018). International determinants of subjective well-being: Living in a subjectively material world. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19. Eurostat (2022). Financial balance sheets - annual data. EVS (2022). Evs trend file 1981-2017. (ZA7503; Version 3.0.0) [Data set]. GESIS, Cologne. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14021. Figueroa, E. and Pastén, R. (2009). Country-specific environmental kuznets curves: a random coefficient approach applied to high-income countries. Estudios de Economia, 36(1):5–32. Forgie, V., McDonald, G., Zhang, G., Patterson, M., and Hardy, D. (2008). Calculating the New Zealand Genuine Progress Indicator, chapter 6, pages 126–152. Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. Gigliarano, C., Balducci, F., Ciommi, M., and Chelli, F. (2014). Going regional: an index of sustainable economic welfare for italy. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 45:63–77. Gil, S. and Sleszynski, J. (2003). An index of sustainable economic welfare for poland. Sustainable Development, 11(1):47–55. Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2):353–377. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., and Puranen, B. (2024). World values survey (1981-2022). trend file. Hamilton, C. (1999). The genuine progress indicator methodological developments and results from australia. Ecological Economics, 30(1):13–28. Hamilton, C. and Denniss, R. (2000). Tracking well-being in australia: The genuine 35progress indicator 2000. Technical Report Discussion Paper Number 35, The Australia Institute. Hanley, N., Moffatt, I., Faichney, R., and Wilson, M. (1999). Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for scotland. Ecological Economics, 28(1):55–73. Hayashi, T. (2015). Measuring rural–urban disparity with the genuine progress indicator: a case study in japan. Ecological Economics, 120:260–271. Held, B., Rodenhäuser, D., Diefenbacher, H., and Zieschank, R. (2018). The national and regional welfare index (nwi/rwi): Redefining progress in germany. Ecological Economics, 145:391–400. Hoffren, J. (2001). Measuring the eco-efficiency of welfare generation in a national econ- omy: The case of finland. Technical Report Tutkimuksia Forskningsrapporter Research Reports 233, Tilastokeskus Statistikcentralen. Hong, V. X. N., Clarke, M., and Lawn, P. (2008). Genuine progress in Vietnam: the impact of the Doi Moi reforms. In Lawn, P. and Clarke, M., editors, Sustainable Welfare in the Asia-Pacific: Studies Using the Genuine Progress Indicator, pages 299– 330. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. International Monetary Fund (2025). World Economic Outlook: A Critical Juncture amid Policy Shifts. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. Jackson, T. (2004). Chasing progress: Beyond measuring economic growth - the power of well-being. Briefing note, new economics foundation, London, United Kingdom. Registered charity number 1055254. Jackson, T., Laing, F., MacGillivray, A., Marks, N., Ralls, J., and Stymne, S. (1997). An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for the UK 1950–1996. University of Surrey Centre for Environmental Strategy. Jackson, T. and Marks, N. (1994). Measuring sustainable economic welfare: A pilot index, 1950–1990. Stockholm Environment Institute. 36K., R. and T., O. (1995). A pilot isew for the netherlands 1950–1992. Report, Amsterdam Instituut Voor Milieu – En Systeemanalyse. Kenny, D. C., Costanza, R., Dowsley, T., Jackson, N., Josol, J., Kubiszewski, I., and Thompson, J. (2019). Australia’s genuine progress indicator revisited (1962–2013). Ecological Economics, 158:1–10. Ko, J., Leung, C. K., Chen, X., and Palmer, D. A. (2024). From emissions to emotions: Exploring the impact of climate change on happiness across 140 countries. Global Transitions, 6:231–240. Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., Lawn, P., Talberth, J., Jackson, T., and Aylmer, C. (2013). Beyond gdp: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 93:57–68. Lawn, P. (2003). A theoretical foundation to support the index of sustainable economic welfare (isew), genuine progress indicator (gpi), and other related indexes. Ecological Economics, 44(1):105–118. Lawn, P. (2008). Genuine progress in australia: time to rethink the growth objective. In Sustainable Welfare in the Asia-Pacific: Studies Using the Genuine Progress Indicator, pages 91–125. Edward Elgar Publishing. Lawn, P. and Clarke, M. (2010). The end of economic growth? a contracting threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 69(11):2213–2223. Lazarus, E. and Brown, C. (2022). Improving the genuine progress indicator to mea- sure comparable net welfare: U.s. and california, 1995-2017. Ecological Economics, 202(C):None. Leal, P. H. and Marques, A. C. (2022). The evolution of the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: A literature review under a critical analysis perspective. Heliyon, 8(11):e11521. Long, X. and Ji, X. (2019). Economic growth quality, environmental sustainability, and 37social welfare in china: Provincial assessment based on genuine progress indicator (gpi). Ecological Economics, 159:157–176. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3):963–1002. Makino, M. (2008). Genuine progress in japan and the need for an open economy gpi. In Sustainable Welfare in the Asia-Pacific: Studies Using the Genuine Progress Indicator, pages 153–189. Edward Elgar Publishing. Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application, and further reflections. The Apex Press. Max-Neef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 15(2):115–118. Max-Neef, M. (2010). The world on a collision course and the need for a new economy. Ambio, 39(3):200–210. Menegaki, A. N. and Tsagarakis, K. P. (2015). More indebted than we know? informing fiscal policy with an index of sustainable welfare for greece. Ecological Indicators, 57:159–163. Neumayer, E. (2000). On the methodology of isew, gpi, and related measures: Some constructive comments and some doubt on the ’threshold’ hypothesis. Ecological Eco- nomics, 34(3):347–361. Ngamaba, K. (2016). Determinants of subjective well-being in representative samples of nations. The European Journal of Public Health, 27:ckw103. Nourry, M. (2008). Measuring sustainable development: Some empirical evidence for france from eight alternative indicators. Ecological Economics, 67(3):441–456. Obermayr, B., Steiner, K., Stockhammer, E., and Hockrieber, H. (1994). Die entwicklung des isew in oesterreich von 1955 bis 1992. Technical report. O’Mahony, T., Escardó-Serra, P., and Dufour, J. (2018). Revisiting isew valuation ap- 38proaches: The case of spain including the costs of energy depletion and of climate change. Ecological Economics, 144:292–303. Popper, K. R. (1934). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, New York. Posner, S. M. and Costanza, R. (2011). A summary of isew and gpi studies at multiple scales and new estimates for baltimore city, baltimore county, and the state of maryland. Ecological Economics, 70(11):1972–1980. Special Section - Earth System Governance: Accountability and Legitimacy. Proto, E. and Rustichini, A. (2013). A reassessment of the relationship between gdp and life satisfaction. PLoS ONE, 8(11):e79358. Research Nester (2026). Fentanyl market size and forecast, by route of administration (sublingual tablet, buccal tablet, oral film), end-user (hospital, oncology centers, surgi- cal centers) – growth trends, key players, regional analysis 2026–2035. Market Research Report 3762, Research Nester. Published February 25, 2026. Rugani, B., Marvuglia, A., and Pulselli, F. M. (2018). Predicting sustainable economic welfare – analysis and perspectives for luxembourg based on energy policy scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137:288–303. Stevenson, B. and Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Re- assessing the easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008:1–87. Stockhammer, E., Hochreiter, H., Obermayr, B., and Steiner, K. (1997). The index of sustainable economic welfare (isew) as an alternative to gdp in measuring economic welfare: The results of the austrian (revised) isew calculation 1955–1992. Ecological Economics, 21(1):19–34. Talberth, J., Cobb, C., and Slattery, N. (2007). The Genuine Progress Indicator 2006. A Tool for Sustainable Development. Technical report, Redefining Progress, Oakland, California. Talberth, J. and Weisdorf, M. (2017). Genuine progress indicator 2.0: Pilot accounts for the us, maryland, and city of baltimore 2012–2014. Ecological Economics, 142:1–11. 39Unanue, W. (2024). A new development paradigm based on happiness and well-being: Max-neef’s contributions for building a better world. In Valenzuela-Rivera, L. and Valle-Barrera, M., editors, Beyond Ecological Economics and Development: Critical Reflections on the Thought of Manfred Max-Neef, pages 56–69. Routledge. Van der Slycken, J. and Bleys, B. (2023). Towards isew and gpi 2.0: Dealing with cross- time and cross-boundary issues in a case study for belgium. Social Indicators Research, 168(1-3):557–583. van Rooij, M., Coibion, O., Georgarakos, D., Candia, B., and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2024). Keeping up with the jansens: Causal peer effects on household spending, beliefs and happiness. IZA Discussion Papers 16769, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Venetoulis, J. and Cobb, C. (2004). The Genuine Progress Indicator 1950–2002 (2004 Update): Measuring the Real State of the Economy. Redefining Progress. Vita, G., Hertwich, E. G., Stadler, K., and Wood, R. (2019). Connecting global emissions to fundamental human needs and their satisfaction. Environmental Research Letters, 14(1). Wang, Q., Li, Y., and Li, R. (2024). Rethinking the environmental kuznets curve hy- pothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11:292. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., Yeong Kim, S., and Brent Donnellan, M. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1):41–61. Wu, L., Wang, S., Bai, X., Luo, G., Wang, J., Chen, F., Li, C., Ran, C., and Zhang, S. (2022). Accelerating the improvement of human well-being in china through economic growth and policy adjustment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19):12566. Zhu, X., Liu, Y., and Fang, X. (2022). Revisiting the sustainable economic welfare growth in china: Provincial assessment based on the isew. Social Indicators Research, 162(1):279–306.