Instructor Attire and Student Output: Evidence from Randomized Class-Section Assignment

Yoshdia, Ken (2026): Instructor Attire and Student Output: Evidence from Randomized Class-Section Assignment.

Abstract

This paper examines whether instructor attire affects not only standard academic outcomes but also students' voluntary written output. The analysis uses data from six first-year introductory "Information (Data Science)" classes at Chiba University of Commerce. All classes were taught by the same instructor under a common syllabus and grading scheme, and instructor attire was randomly assigned at the class-section level, with three sections in the suit condition and three in the casual condition. To reflect this design, the paper reports student-level regressions with class-clustered standard errors together with randomization-based inference. The results show no significant effect of suit attire on final exam scores or attendance. By contrast, suit attire is associated with fewer reaction-paper submissions and fewer words written. The estimated effect on the sentiment score is positive but imprecisely estimated. Overall, the evidence suggests that instructor attire matters less for standard academic performance than for students' willingness to produce written output.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: instructor attire; student performance; voluntary student output; reaction papers; sentiment score.
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions

References

Cheng, A., and Zamarro, G. (2018). Measuring Teacher Non-Cognitive Skills and Its Impact on Students: Insight from the Measures of Effective Teaching Longitudinal Database. Economics of Education Review, 64, 251–260.

Christophel, D. M. (1990). The Relationships among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Student Motivation, and Learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340.

Christophel, D. M., and Gorham, J. (1995). A Test-Retest Analysis of Student Motivation, Teacher Immediacy, and Perceived Sources of Motivation and Demotivation in College Classes. Communication Education, 44(4), 292–306.

Craig, J. D. (2015). Does Instructor Appearance Affect Student Learning of Principles of Economics? Australasian Journal of Economics Education, 12(2), 30–49.

Craig, J. D., and Savage, S. J. (2014). Instructor Attire and Student Performance: Evidence from an Undergraduate Industrial Organization Experiment. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 55–65.

Hanushek, E. A. (2020). Education Production Functions. In S. Bradley and C. Green (Eds.), The Economics of Education (2nd ed., pp. 161–170). Academic Press.

Hanushek, E. A., and Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher Quality. In E. A. Hanushek and F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 2, pp. 1051–1078). Elsevier.

Lavin, A. M., Davies, T. L., and Carr, D. L. (2010). The Impact of Instructor Attire on Student Perceptions of Faculty Credibility and Their Own Resultant Behavior. American Journal of Business Education, 3(6), 51–62.

Lightstone, K., Francis, R., and Kocum, L. (2011). University Faculty Style of Dress and Students’ Perception of Instructor Credibility. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15), 15–22.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., and Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ Emotions and Academic Engagement: Introduction to the Special Issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 1–3.

Liu, W. (2021). Does Teacher Immediacy Affect Students? A Systematic Review of the Association between Teacher Verbal and Non-verbal Immediacy and Student Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 713978.

Menzel, K. E., and Carrell, L. J. (1999). The Impact of Gender and Immediacy on Willingness to Talk and Perceived Learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 31–40.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., and Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic Emotions in Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105.

Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., and Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom Emotional Climate, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712.

Roberts, A., and Friedman, D. (2013). The Impact of Teacher Immediacy on Student Participation: An Objective Cross-Disciplinary Examination. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 38–46.

Shepherd, D., and Yeon, S. (2022). Student Preferences about University Education Department Instructor Attire. Knowledge, 2(2), 191–208.

Sutton, R. E., and Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ Emotions and Teaching: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358.